南非工傷保險(xiǎn)法律制度研究
[Abstract]:The legal system of industrial injury insurance in South Africa started early. The first Labor compensation Law was promulgated in 1914, and the transformation from employer liability insurance system to industrial injury social insurance system was realized in 1930. The legal system of industrial injury insurance in South Africa mainly includes three aspects: industrial injury compensation, industrial injury rehabilitation and industrial injury prevention. The relevant legislation mainly includes the Industrial injury and Occupational Disease compensation Act of 1993 (No. 130), the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1993 (No. 85) and the Mining Health and Safety Act of 1996 (No. 29). This paper mainly focuses on industrial injury compensation. The substantive legal system of industrial injury insurance in South Africa is rich and substantial. This paper mainly introduces and analyzes the treatment of industrial injury insurance, industrial injury insurance fund, industrial injury rehabilitation and prevention and so on. South Africa uses a broad definition of industrial injury, including industrial accidents and occupational diseases. The treatment of industrial injury insurance is mainly divided into three categories: work-related disability treatment, work-related death treatment, industrial injury medical treatment, in which the work-related disability treatment sets different treatment standards according to the different disability grades of employees; in the work-related death treatment, the dependent relatives of employees who die at work are widely covered, and those who remarry can continue to enjoy pensions; industrial injury medical treatment includes the transportation expenses of industrial-injury employees. Based on the analysis of Jooste v Score Supermarket Trading (Pty) Ltd and Jiya v Durban roodepoortDeep Ltd cases, this paper analyzes the constitutionality of the comprehensive substitution model applied in South Africa and the possibility of retaining the civil damages right of disabled employees when the treatment of industrial injury insurance and the civil liability of employers compete. The industrial injury insurance agencies in South Africa include the compensation Fund Committee, the Mutual Assistance Association (Rand Mutual Insurance Co., Ltd. And the Federation of employers' Mutual Insurance Associations). The compensation fund is mainly raised through the mandatory assessment fee paid by the employer, and the employer's evaluation fee is adjusted by using the industry rate and floating rate of the combination of rewards and punishments to ensure the balance of income and expenditure of the fund and promote the prevention of industrial injury. In addition, the occupational health and safety law and mining health and safety law are adopted to ensure the development of industrial injury rehabilitation and prevention. The procedural legal system mainly introduces the procedures related to the treatment of industrial injury insurance, dispute settlement mechanism and supervision and management bodies. The complete procedures for industrial injury insurance in South Africa are: application for industrial injury identification-application for compensation-acceptance of application for approval of industrial injury insurance treatment-first objection and then appeal, in which the interim court is responsible for handling the objection. The supervision and management mode adopts the supervision of the central department (labor department and health department) appointed by the government and relies on the management mode of the compensation committee. After each chapter, this paper compares the similarities and differences between the legal system of industrial injury insurance in South Africa and China, and finally evaluates the legal system of industrial injury insurance in South Africa from a macro point of view by using logical analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D997
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 夏新華;劉星;;論南非法律體系的混合特性[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2010年04期
2 蔡忠;;南非煤礦安全生產(chǎn)概況[J];勞動(dòng)保護(hù);2010年04期
3 劉喜堂;;南非社會(huì)救助政策評(píng)析[J];中國(guó)民政;2010年09期
4 黃金榮;;司法保障經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)權(quán)利的可能性與限度——南非憲法法院格魯特布姆案評(píng)析[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2006年01期
5 夏新華,王曉梅;論南非法制變革趨勢(shì)[J];西亞非洲;2000年01期
6 楊立華;新南非十年:多元一體國(guó)家的建設(shè)[J];西亞非洲;2004年04期
7 鄭智航;;論南非健康權(quán)的救濟(jì)[J];西亞非洲;2009年02期
8 夏吉生;新南非司法制度初探[J];西亞非洲;1997年02期
9 楊立華;;南非社會(huì)保障體系中的社會(huì)救助制度[J];西亞非洲;2010年09期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 路曉霞;混合法傳統(tǒng)下的南非合同法[D];湘潭大學(xué);2004年
2 周?chē)?yán);論南非反就業(yè)歧視法[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年
3 張燕華;工傷賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償競(jìng)合之法律探析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年
本文編號(hào):2505815
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2505815.html