發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-13 11:43

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和投資自由化使國(guó)際投資產(chǎn)生的法律問題越來越受到關(guān)注。在國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域投資者爭(zhēng)取利益最大化與東道國(guó)加強(qiáng)對(duì)本國(guó)的法律監(jiān)管存在天然難以調(diào)和的矛盾。特別是引人矚目的《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》生效后，因投資者對(duì)東道國(guó)提起訴訟引發(fā)的多起案例使本身就極具爭(zhēng)議的公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)得到了前所未有的關(guān)注。這些實(shí)踐中的案例直接促使公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在近年來得到長(zhǎng)足的發(fā)展。 由于公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)其本身具有抽象性并且難以進(jìn)行具體適用，本文首先從確定其內(nèi)涵著手，比較國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)所持的不同態(tài)度，對(duì)其應(yīng)涵蓋的基本含義做一個(gè)概括的分析。然后根據(jù)國(guó)際投資協(xié)定中關(guān)于公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體現(xiàn)的條款并結(jié)合早期及晚近發(fā)生的與其有關(guān)的仲裁實(shí)踐，來尋證作為一個(gè)不確定性的待遇保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)所應(yīng)該基本涵蓋的要素。隨后從不同的角度對(duì)公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與國(guó)民待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、最惠國(guó)待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及國(guó)際法最低待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了比較與區(qū)分。從平衡東道國(guó)主權(quán)利益以及投資者合法權(quán)益為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，通過分析這些可能包含其中的要素以及其不從屬于他者的性質(zhì)，論證了公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)更能體現(xiàn)法律所追求的公平、正義價(jià)值。最后，本文剖析了我國(guó)簽訂的國(guó)際投資協(xié)定，其中對(duì)于公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同措辭及雜亂的規(guī)定都需要進(jìn)行修正，并據(jù)此分析了完善建議，以便對(duì)妥善解決我國(guó)將來可能面對(duì)與投資有關(guān)的糾紛有所裨益。 本文在探討有關(guān)公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵時(shí)綜合運(yùn)用了歸納分析方法，，通過對(duì)國(guó)際社會(huì)以及不同國(guó)家學(xué)者們的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行歸類并總結(jié)分析出確定其可能包含的因素；另外還引入不同時(shí)期的仲裁實(shí)踐，理論聯(lián)系實(shí)踐研究不同的仲裁裁決以確定公平公正待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的獨(dú)立地位；最后對(duì)他國(guó)的投資協(xié)定進(jìn)行全面的對(duì)比分析，提出對(duì)我國(guó)有益的完善建議。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization and the liberalization of investment have attracted more and more attention to the legal issues arising from international investment. In the field of international investment, the maximization of the interests of investors in the field of international investment and the strengthening of the host country have a natural and hard-to-reconcile contradiction with the domestic legal supervision. In particular, after the entry into force of the attention of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a number of cases raised by the investor's litigation against the host country have given unprecedented attention to the highly controversial standards of fair and fair treatment. The cases in these practices directly contributed to the development of the standards of fair and fair treatment in recent years. Since the standard of fair and fair treatment is of abstract nature and is difficult to apply, the paper first begins with the definition of its connotation, compares the different attitude of the international community to the standard of fair and fair treatment, and makes an outline of the basic meaning that it covers. Analysis. Then, according to the provisions of the international investment agreement on the standard of fair and fair treatment and the arbitration practice related to the early and late, it is necessary to find the evidence to be covered by the standard of treatment protection as an uncertainty in that follow, the standard of fair and fair treatment and the standard of national treatment, the standard of most-favoured-nation treatment and the minimum standard of treatment for international law were then compared and region from a different point of view On the basis of balancing the sovereignty interests of the host country and the legitimate rights and interests of the investors, it is proved that the fair and fair treatment standard can better reflect the fairness and the justice price pursued by the law through the analysis of the elements that may contain them and the nature of them. Finally, this paper analyzes the international investment agreement signed by our country, among which, it is necessary to make the amendment to the different wording and the disorder of the fair and fair treatment standard, and the suggestions are also analyzed, so as to solve the disputes related to the investment in the future of our country. This paper, when exploring the connotation of the standard of fair and fair treatment, makes a comprehensive use of the inductive analysis method, and by classifying and summarizing the views of the international community and the scholars of different countries and summarizing the factors that can be included in the analysis, and also introducing the secondary analysis methods in different periods In order to determine the independent status of the standard of fair and fair treatment, the thesis makes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the investment agreement of other countries, and puts forward the conclusion that it is beneficial to our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 武桂馥;;中美最惠國(guó)待遇問題的前景[J];未來與發(fā)展;1992年05期

2 丁幸豪;中美關(guān)系發(fā)展的歷史性機(jī)遇[J];國(guó)際展望;1994年12期

3 ;外交部發(fā)言人1998年6月4日答記者問[J];中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)院公報(bào);1998年15期

4 朱元;;投資自由化與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)政策國(guó)際化[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年15期

5 梁立華;人權(quán)與最惠國(guó)待遇[J];時(shí)事(時(shí)事報(bào)告中學(xué)生版);1994年01期

6 潘同文;;系鈴與解鈴——談最惠國(guó)待遇與人權(quán)脫鉤[J];世界知識(shí);1994年12期

7 劉春鵬;什么是最惠國(guó)待遇?什么是國(guó)民待遇?[J];理論學(xué)習(xí);2000年04期

8 王楠;;最惠國(guó)待遇條款在國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決事項(xiàng)上的適用問題[J];河北法學(xué);2010年01期

9 ;外交部發(fā)言人1994年3月3日答記者問[J];中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)院公報(bào);1994年04期

10 熊s�，冯文�

本文編號(hào)：2498509