【摘要】：東京審判的管轄權問題多年來一直爭議不斷,關涉遠東國際軍事法庭是否具有合法性以及有無管轄上的"越權"和"失職"等問題。戰(zhàn)后審判的特殊性和國際刑法發(fā)展的階段性造成了東京審判管轄權確立的困難,東京審判管轄權并非沒有瑕疵,但其合法性和正義性不容置疑。東京審判管轄權的確立賦予國際刑法以剛性,促進了國際刑事責任的個人化,闡明了"選擇性司法"的危害,為國際刑法的當代發(fā)展留下了大量珍貴的法律遺產(chǎn)。
[Abstract]:The issue of jurisdiction over the Tokyo trial has been in dispute over the years, whether it has the legitimacy of the Far East International Military Court and the existence or absence of such issues as "ultra vires" and "breach of duty". The particularity of the post-war trial and the stage of the development of the international criminal law have caused the difficulties in the establishment of the jurisdiction of the Tokyo trial, and the jurisdiction of the Tokyo trial is not free of defects, but its legitimacy and justice are beyond question. The establishment of the jurisdiction in Tokyo gives the international criminal law the rigidity, promotes the individual of the international criminal responsibility, expounds the harm of the "selective justice", and has left a great deal of precious legal legacy for the contemporary development of the international criminal law.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院研究生院;
【分類號】：D995

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 馮兆蕙,馮文生;“跨國”侵犯知識產(chǎn)權案件的審判管轄與法律適用[J];河北法學;1999年06期

，

本文編號：2497493