國際商事仲裁司法審查制度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-02 07:38
【摘要】：論文討論了國際商事仲示司法審查的價(jià)值取向及主要內(nèi)容,全文在結(jié)構(gòu)上分為五章。寫作思路是對國際商事仲裁司法審查的理論和實(shí)踐進(jìn)行實(shí)證和規(guī)范的考查,圍繞國際商事仲裁司法審查制度的一個(gè)主要價(jià)值目標(biāo)、四個(gè)關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)展開論述,并結(jié)合每一章討論的問題,對我國司法審查制度存在的相關(guān)問題和缺陷提出具有針對性的建構(gòu)方案。 第一章討論國際商事仲裁司法審查的若干基本問題,圍繞司法審查的價(jià)值目標(biāo),主要討論三個(gè)問題。一是國際商事仲裁的概念,二是司法審查的概念,三是論述國際商事仲裁司法審查的正當(dāng)性及適度性。寫作進(jìn)路是通過厘清一些與研究主題相關(guān)的概念和法理的問題,理順?biāo)痉ㄅc國際商事仲裁的相互關(guān)系,奠定司法審查制度價(jià)值取向的法理基礎(chǔ)。本章的重點(diǎn)是從法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度分析論證司法審查的價(jià)值追求應(yīng)該是支持仲裁,即法院或法官應(yīng)傾向于盡可能由仲裁解決糾紛、傾向于認(rèn)定仲裁協(xié)議有效；傾向于程序?qū)彶闉橹鳌?shí)體審查為輔；傾向于承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行裁決為主、拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行仲裁裁決為輔。同時(shí)還對我國司法審查制度在立法理念方面的不足展開評(píng)述,提出我國應(yīng)在國際、國內(nèi)商事仲裁司法審查方面實(shí)行并軌,并在司法審查范圍上實(shí)行適度監(jiān)督模式的建構(gòu)意見。 第二章專題論述對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議有效性的司法審查。仲裁協(xié)議是國際商事仲裁的基礎(chǔ),也是司法審查的第一個(gè)關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),因此,本章作為研究司法審查的具體內(nèi)容的第一章來考查對仲裁協(xié)議有效性的司法審查。從傳統(tǒng)理論和各國的具體實(shí)踐來看,主流的做法是奉行依據(jù)當(dāng)事人意思自治的原則來確定仲裁協(xié)議的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法,同時(shí)以其他方式作為補(bǔ)充。法院對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議有效性監(jiān)督的具體內(nèi)容包括：仲裁協(xié)議是否具備法定的形式要件和實(shí)質(zhì)要件,仲裁協(xié)議有關(guān)內(nèi)容是否符合可仲裁性的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定等。在對我國司法審查制度進(jìn)行比較分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本章提出了合理構(gòu)建有關(guān)仲裁協(xié)議的形式和實(shí)質(zhì)性要件的機(jī)制,并適當(dāng)拓展可仲裁性范圍等立法建議。 第三章討論國際商事仲裁程序的司法審查問題。當(dāng)事人在國際商事仲裁進(jìn)行過程中也可能發(fā)生爭議。由于仲裁的民間性特點(diǎn),人們往往會(huì)尋求司法的干預(yù)來保障仲裁程序的順利進(jìn)行。本章主要討論司法對國際商事仲裁程序進(jìn)行的積極協(xié)助與支持。在對我國的有關(guān)制度進(jìn)行比較評(píng)析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出設(shè)立支持仲裁庭組成、合并仲裁制度、仲裁臨時(shí)措施等機(jī)制的建議。 第四章關(guān)于國際商事仲裁裁決的司法審查。仲裁裁決是司法審查的最重要焦點(diǎn)之一。一般來說,只有裁決地國法院才有權(quán)行使裁決的撤銷這種追訴權(quán)。因此,撤銷裁決涉及裁決的國籍識(shí)別問題。當(dāng)前解決識(shí)別問題的主流標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是仲裁地標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即仲裁地法院具有撤銷仲裁裁決的管轄權(quán)。只有具備普遍認(rèn)可的撤銷條件,仲裁地法院才能撤銷裁決。傳統(tǒng)理論認(rèn)為,已被撤銷后的裁決不再具有法律效力而被執(zhí)行,但一些區(qū)域協(xié)定已有創(chuàng)新規(guī)定,即對某些特殊的已被撤銷的裁決仍然賦予執(zhí)行力。本章對這些制度創(chuàng)新和實(shí)踐創(chuàng)新進(jìn)行了評(píng)述,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出修改我國的仲裁裁決國籍識(shí)別制度、完善裁決撤銷理由制度、重構(gòu)裁決異議審查報(bào)告制度等立法建議。 第五章關(guān)于承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國際商事仲裁裁決的司法審查。是否承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國際商事裁決是司法審查的最后環(huán)節(jié),也是最重要的環(huán)節(jié)。一般說來,承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行裁決的司法審查權(quán)由被申請人國或者被執(zhí)行財(cái)產(chǎn)所在地國法院行使。如同對國際仲裁裁決的司法審查一樣,這也涉及裁決的國籍識(shí)別問題。比較通行的國籍判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是1958年《承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行外國仲裁裁決公約》(又稱《紐約公約》)確定的裁決作成地標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和非內(nèi)國裁決標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。我國司法實(shí)踐日益趨近國際上的主流實(shí)踐,但在制度層面還存在一些不足,主要表現(xiàn)在：我國國際商事仲裁國籍識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)采用仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)國籍標(biāo)準(zhǔn),與國際主流標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有很大差異,在操作實(shí)務(wù)上容易出現(xiàn)相互矛盾的情況；缺乏對非《紐約公約》裁決的具體規(guī)制；也缺乏對公共秩序政策適用、司法審查裁定的上訴制度等方面的具體規(guī)制等。本章針對這些問題提出了相應(yīng)的建議。 論文的最后部分是結(jié)束語,也是對全文的總結(jié)。論文在這部分首先概括了各國關(guān)于國際商事仲裁司法審查的立法和司法實(shí)踐理念,即對國際商事仲裁的全力支持與適度監(jiān)督。接著勾勒了我國的司法審查制度應(yīng)當(dāng)引進(jìn)的先進(jìn)立法理念。最后,集中地對我國司法審查制度的幾個(gè)重點(diǎn)部分提出了綜合性的立法建議。
[Abstract]:The article discusses the value orientation and main content of the judicial review of the international commercial law, and the full text is divided into five chapters. The idea of writing is to examine the theory and practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and to discuss the four key links around the main value goal of the judicial review system of international commercial arbitration, and to combine the problems discussed in each chapter. The relevant problems and defects in the system of judicial review in China are put forward. The first chapter discusses some basic problems of judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and discusses three questions about the value goal of judicial review. The first is the concept of international commercial arbitration, the second is the concept of judicial review, and the third is to discuss the validity and the right of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration. The writing route is a legal basis for clarifying the relationship between the judicial and the international commercial arbitration, and laying the foundation for the value orientation of the judicial review system by clarifying some of the concepts and the legal theory related to the subject of the study. The focus of this chapter is to analyze the value pursuit of judicial review from the perspective of law economics. The value pursuit of judicial review should be to support the arbitration, that is, the court or the judge should be inclined to settle the dispute as much as possible, and it is inclined to find that the arbitration agreement is valid; it is preferred that the procedure review be the main, and the entity shall review it as the main body in favour of recognition and enforcement of that award, the refusal to recognize and enforce the arbitral award is At the same time, the author makes a comment on the insufficiency of the system of judicial review in China, and puts forward that China should adopt and track the judicial review of international and domestic commercial arbitration, and implement the construction of the appropriate supervision mode in the scope of judicial review. See chap. II. Thematic discussion on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement The arbitration agreement is the basis of the international commercial arbitration and the first key link of judicial review. Therefore, this chapter is the first chapter of the specific content of the judicial review to examine the division of the validity of the arbitration agreement. From the traditional theory and the concrete practice of each country, the main approach is to follow the principle of self-government of the parties to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement, and to do so in other ways In order to supplement, the specific content of the court's supervision on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement includes whether the arbitration agreement has the legal form and essential elements, and whether the relevant content of the arbitration agreement is in conformity with the enforceability of the arbitration agreement On the basis of the comparative analysis of the judicial review system in China, this chapter put forward the mechanism of reasonable construction of the form and the substantive elements of the arbitration agreement, and extended the scope of the arbitrability appropriately. Legal recommendations. Chapter III discusses the Division for International Commercial Arbitration in that course of the conduct of international commercial arbitration, the parties may also Disputes can occur. People tend to seek judicial intervention to guarantee the arbitration proceedings due to the folklore of the arbitration. The present chapter mainly discusses the positive effect of the administration of justice on the procedure of international commercial arbitration. On the basis of comparing and analyzing the relevant system of our country, this paper puts forward the establishment of supporting the arbitration tribunal, combining the arbitration system, the arbitration interim measure and so on. Recommendations of the mechanism. Chapter IV on international commercial arbitration Judicial review of the award. The arbitral award is a judicial review. One of the most important focuses. In general, only the court of the State of the country has the right to exercise its decision. The right to appeal is to be withdrawn. Therefore, the revocation of the award relates to a decision The issue of the identification of nationality is the standard of the arbitration, that is, the court of the place of arbitration has the withdrawal of the secondary. The jurisdiction of the award. There is only a general recognition of the conditions of the revocation, the method of arbitration, The court can revoke the ruling. The traditional theory holds that the award that has been revoked no longer has the legal effect and is implemented, but some regional agreements have provided for innovative provisions, that is, for certain special, revoked decisions In this chapter, the innovation and practice of these systems are reviewed, and on this basis, it is proposed to modify the recognition system of the nationality of the arbitration award of our country, to improve the system of the revocation of the decision and to reconstitute the report on the review of the objection of the decision. Legislative recommendations, such as the system. Chapter V deals with the recognition and enforcement of international commercial law Judicial review of arbitral awards. The recognition and enforcement of international commercial decisions is the final part of the judicial review It is also the most important part. In general, the right to a judicial review of the recognition and enforcement of a decision is made by the respondent State or the subject of execution in that case of a judicial review of an international arbitral award, this also concern The question of the identification of the nationality of the award. The comparison of the criteria for the determination of the nationality of the passage of nationality is a landmark in the determination made in 1958 of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (also referred to as the New York Convention) China's judicial practice is increasingly close to the international mainstream practice, but there are still some shortcomings in the system level. The main performance is that the international commercial arbitration nationality recognition standard of our country adopts the nationality standard of the arbitration institution, and it is the same as that of the international There is a significant difference in the mainstream standards, which are prone to conflicting situations in the practice of operation; the lack of specific regulations for non-New York Convention and decisions; and the lack of an appeal system for the application of public order policies and the judicial review of decisions And so on. This chapter is for these questions. The final part of the paper is the knot. In this part, the author summarizes the legislative and judicial practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, that is, the international commercial secondary. The full support and moderate supervision of the cut-off, and then outlines the system of judicial review in our country. The advanced legislative idea that should be introduced. At last, some key parts of the judicial review system of our country
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4
本文編號(hào)：2490933
[Abstract]:The article discusses the value orientation and main content of the judicial review of the international commercial law, and the full text is divided into five chapters. The idea of writing is to examine the theory and practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and to discuss the four key links around the main value goal of the judicial review system of international commercial arbitration, and to combine the problems discussed in each chapter. The relevant problems and defects in the system of judicial review in China are put forward. The first chapter discusses some basic problems of judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and discusses three questions about the value goal of judicial review. The first is the concept of international commercial arbitration, the second is the concept of judicial review, and the third is to discuss the validity and the right of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration. The writing route is a legal basis for clarifying the relationship between the judicial and the international commercial arbitration, and laying the foundation for the value orientation of the judicial review system by clarifying some of the concepts and the legal theory related to the subject of the study. The focus of this chapter is to analyze the value pursuit of judicial review from the perspective of law economics. The value pursuit of judicial review should be to support the arbitration, that is, the court or the judge should be inclined to settle the dispute as much as possible, and it is inclined to find that the arbitration agreement is valid; it is preferred that the procedure review be the main, and the entity shall review it as the main body in favour of recognition and enforcement of that award, the refusal to recognize and enforce the arbitral award is At the same time, the author makes a comment on the insufficiency of the system of judicial review in China, and puts forward that China should adopt and track the judicial review of international and domestic commercial arbitration, and implement the construction of the appropriate supervision mode in the scope of judicial review. See chap. II. Thematic discussion on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement The arbitration agreement is the basis of the international commercial arbitration and the first key link of judicial review. Therefore, this chapter is the first chapter of the specific content of the judicial review to examine the division of the validity of the arbitration agreement. From the traditional theory and the concrete practice of each country, the main approach is to follow the principle of self-government of the parties to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement, and to do so in other ways In order to supplement, the specific content of the court's supervision on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement includes whether the arbitration agreement has the legal form and essential elements, and whether the relevant content of the arbitration agreement is in conformity with the enforceability of the arbitration agreement On the basis of the comparative analysis of the judicial review system in China, this chapter put forward the mechanism of reasonable construction of the form and the substantive elements of the arbitration agreement, and extended the scope of the arbitrability appropriately. Legal recommendations. Chapter III discusses the Division for International Commercial Arbitration in that course of the conduct of international commercial arbitration, the parties may also Disputes can occur. People tend to seek judicial intervention to guarantee the arbitration proceedings due to the folklore of the arbitration. The present chapter mainly discusses the positive effect of the administration of justice on the procedure of international commercial arbitration. On the basis of comparing and analyzing the relevant system of our country, this paper puts forward the establishment of supporting the arbitration tribunal, combining the arbitration system, the arbitration interim measure and so on. Recommendations of the mechanism. Chapter IV on international commercial arbitration Judicial review of the award. The arbitral award is a judicial review. One of the most important focuses. In general, only the court of the State of the country has the right to exercise its decision. The right to appeal is to be withdrawn. Therefore, the revocation of the award relates to a decision The issue of the identification of nationality is the standard of the arbitration, that is, the court of the place of arbitration has the withdrawal of the secondary. The jurisdiction of the award. There is only a general recognition of the conditions of the revocation, the method of arbitration, The court can revoke the ruling. The traditional theory holds that the award that has been revoked no longer has the legal effect and is implemented, but some regional agreements have provided for innovative provisions, that is, for certain special, revoked decisions In this chapter, the innovation and practice of these systems are reviewed, and on this basis, it is proposed to modify the recognition system of the nationality of the arbitration award of our country, to improve the system of the revocation of the decision and to reconstitute the report on the review of the objection of the decision. Legislative recommendations, such as the system. Chapter V deals with the recognition and enforcement of international commercial law Judicial review of arbitral awards. The recognition and enforcement of international commercial decisions is the final part of the judicial review It is also the most important part. In general, the right to a judicial review of the recognition and enforcement of a decision is made by the respondent State or the subject of execution in that case of a judicial review of an international arbitral award, this also concern The question of the identification of the nationality of the award. The comparison of the criteria for the determination of the nationality of the passage of nationality is a landmark in the determination made in 1958 of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (also referred to as the New York Convention) China's judicial practice is increasingly close to the international mainstream practice, but there are still some shortcomings in the system level. The main performance is that the international commercial arbitration nationality recognition standard of our country adopts the nationality standard of the arbitration institution, and it is the same as that of the international There is a significant difference in the mainstream standards, which are prone to conflicting situations in the practice of operation; the lack of specific regulations for non-New York Convention and decisions; and the lack of an appeal system for the application of public order policies and the judicial review of decisions And so on. This chapter is for these questions. The final part of the paper is the knot. In this part, the author summarizes the legislative and judicial practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, that is, the international commercial secondary. The full support and moderate supervision of the cut-off, and then outlines the system of judicial review in our country. The advanced legislative idea that should be introduced. At last, some key parts of the judicial review system of our country
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊良宜;;關(guān)于可仲裁性(一)[J];北京仲裁;2005年03期
2 趙秀文;;淺談我國仲裁裁決的分類[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期
3 周佳;;1958年《紐約公約》第一條述評(píng)——兼論我國仲裁法律體系下的國際商事仲裁裁決的國籍[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期
4 陳立峰;王海量;;論我國《仲裁法》的管轄范圍[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期
5 李夢園;宋連斌;;論社會(huì)公共利益與商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督——對我國法院若干司法實(shí)踐的分析[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期
6 周江;;商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督模式的理論反思[J];北京仲裁;2006年04期
7 宋連斌;董海洲;;國際商會(huì)仲裁裁決國籍研究——從最高人民法院的一份復(fù)函談起[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期
8 聶詠青;非內(nèi)國仲裁理論評(píng)論[J];法律適用;2005年09期
9 趙秀文;從克羅馬羅依案看國際仲裁裁決的撤銷與執(zhí)行[J];法商研究;2002年05期
10 寧敏,宋連斌;評(píng)國際商事仲裁中的管轄權(quán)原則[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 申黎;國際商事仲裁的司法介入制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號(hào)：2490933
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2490933.html
最近更新
教材專著
