【摘要】：自1949年中華人民共和國成立以來,內(nèi)地一直保持著統(tǒng)一的政治制度和司法體系。而香港回歸祖國后,根據(jù)“一國兩制”的原則,這種局面被打破,內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)形成了兩個不同法域,“一國兩制”也被《香港特別行政區(qū)基本法》所確認。因此,內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)面臨著前所未有的法律沖突問題。隨著內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)民商事交往的增多,兩地之間的民商事案件也不斷增加,因此兩地的司法協(xié)助尤為重要。毫無疑問,法院民商事判決的承認與執(zhí)行是內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)司法協(xié)助的首要問題,只有在兩地實現(xiàn)民商事判決的流通,才能更好的保護當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利,推動兩地經(jīng)貿(mào)健康持續(xù)發(fā)展。目前內(nèi)地和香港特別行政區(qū)在民商事案件判決的承認和執(zhí)行盡管已達成《關(guān)于內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)法院互相認可和執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人協(xié)議管轄的民商事案件判決的安排》(以下簡稱《安排》)但《安排》調(diào)整的范圍過小,不能滿足兩地之間經(jīng)貿(mào)往來的需要。針對這種情況,筆者認為應(yīng)當(dāng)對內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)法院民商事判決的承認與執(zhí)行進行研究,在現(xiàn)有研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合中國的實際和其他國家和地區(qū)的做法,嘗試尋找合適的協(xié)調(diào)方式和解決辦法,以解決兩地間在管轄權(quán)和判決的承認與執(zhí)上存在的法律沖突,實現(xiàn)判決在兩地的流通。 本文借助現(xiàn)有國內(nèi)外研究資料和已有成果,對兩地民商事案件判決承認與執(zhí)行所涉及的諸多問題進行了較為全面、深入和系統(tǒng)的探討。文章正文主要分六個部分,首先介紹了區(qū)際司法協(xié)助中法院判決與承認的基本問題,分析了內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)判決承認與執(zhí)行的現(xiàn)狀。然后,逐一分析了內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)法院判決承認與執(zhí)行的條件。接下來,筆者通過對相關(guān)國際條約與其他多法域國家區(qū)際法院判決承認與執(zhí)行,又在我國學(xué)者的現(xiàn)有研究基礎(chǔ)上得出我國內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)當(dāng)前應(yīng)選擇區(qū)際協(xié)議的模式解決兩地判決承認與執(zhí)行的問題。最后對解決內(nèi)地與香港民商事判決承認與執(zhí)行進行了一些具體建議。本文試圖根據(jù)我國的實際情況以及國外的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗,結(jié)合理論總結(jié)出若干原則,在原則的框架下建構(gòu)解決內(nèi)地與香港判決承認與執(zhí)行的模式。
[Abstract]:Since the founding of the people's Republic of China in 1949, the mainland has maintained a unified political system and judicial system. After Hong Kong's return to the motherland, according to the principle of "one country, two systems", this situation has been broken, the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region have formed two different jurisdiction, and "one country, two systems" has also been confirmed by the basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region. Therefore, the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region are facing unprecedented conflicts of law. With the increase of civil and commercial exchanges between the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, the number of civil and commercial cases between the two places is also increasing, so mutual legal assistance between the two places is particularly important. There is no doubt that the recognition and enforcement of court civil and commercial judgments is the primary issue of mutual legal assistance between the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region. Only by realizing the circulation of civil and commercial judgments between the two places can the rights of the parties be better protected. We will promote the healthy and sustainable development of economic and trade between the two places. At present, the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial cases between the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, although they have reached an agreement between the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region on the mutual approval of the courts of the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial cases governed by the agreement of the parties Arrangement > (hereinafter referred to as "arrangement") but the scope of the adjustment of "arrangement" is too small, Can not meet the needs of economic and trade exchanges between the two places. In view of this situation, the author believes that the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in the courts of the mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region should be studied, and on the basis of the existing research results, combined with the actual practices of China and the practices of other countries and regions, This paper tries to find a suitable coordination way and solution to solve the legal conflict between the two places in the recognition and enforcement of jurisdiction and judgment, and to realize the circulation of judgment between the two places. Based on the existing research data and achievements at home and abroad, this paper makes a comprehensive, in-depth and systematic discussion on many problems involved in the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial cases in the two places. The main body of the article is divided into six parts. Firstly, it introduces the basic problems of court judgment and recognition in interregional mutual legal assistance, and analyzes the present situation of recognition and enforcement of judgment in mainland and Hong Kong Special Administrative region. Then, the conditions of recognition and enforcement of court judgments in mainland and Hong Kong Special Administrative region are analyzed one by one. Next, the author recognizes and implements the relevant international treaties and the decisions of other multi-jurisdiction national interregional courts. On the basis of the existing research of Chinese scholars, it is concluded that the mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative region should choose the mode of interregional agreement to solve the problem of recognition and enforcement of judgments between the two places. Finally, some concrete suggestions are made to solve the problem of recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in mainland and Hong Kong. According to the actual situation of our country and the relevant experience of foreign countries, this paper attempts to sum up some principles and construct a model to solve the problem of recognition and enforcement of judgments in mainland and Hong Kong under the framework of the principles.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃燕璇;;論內(nèi)地與香港法院民商事判決的相互承認與執(zhí)行[J];行政與法;2009年05期

2 陳婉娜;;對《關(guān)于內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)法院相互認可和執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人協(xié)議管轄的民商事案件判決的安排》的幾點看法[J];黨政干部論壇;2007年S1期

3 林小娟;;內(nèi)地與香港相互承認與執(zhí)行法院判決之深化——以《安排》為基礎(chǔ)[J];荊門職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

4 汪祖興;也論內(nèi)地和香港相互承認和執(zhí)行法院判決[J];河北法學(xué);2005年09期

5 劉恩媛;;中國承認與執(zhí)行外國判決的基礎(chǔ)條件[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2008年03期

6 黃瑞;試論中國國際民商事司法協(xié)助[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1996年01期

7 董麗萍;中澳承認與執(zhí)行外國判決的條件[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;1996年02期

8 賴紫寧,羅杜芳;一國兩制下內(nèi)地與香港法院相互承認與執(zhí)行判決的問題研究[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1997年06期

9 佘延宏;吳濤;;外國法院判決在泰國的承認與執(zhí)行[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2008年01期

10 張雯;王鴻信;;《協(xié)議選擇法院公約》對國際商事仲裁模式的借鑒及影響[J];中州學(xué)刊;2008年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 于志宏;;內(nèi)地與香港特別行政區(qū)司法協(xié)助的新發(fā)展——評兩地相互認可和執(zhí)行民商事案件判決的安排[A];2006年中國青年國際法學(xué)者暨博士生論壇論文集（國際私法卷）[C];2006年

2 張文亮;;被撤銷之國際商事仲裁裁決及其承認與執(zhí)行[A];2008全國博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇（國際法）論文集——國際公法、國際私法分冊[C];2008年

3 王傳麗;張薇;;兩岸四地民商事判決承認與執(zhí)行的若干法律問題[A];《WTO法與中國論壇》文集——中國法學(xué)會世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會年會論文集(六)[C];2007年

4 董立坤;董立坤;;加強中、港兩地民商事司法協(xié)助 促進香港與內(nèi)地經(jīng)濟的共同繁榮[A];2002中國經(jīng)濟特區(qū)論壇：現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)中的體制問題學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2002年

5 韋經(jīng)建;陳澤桐;;關(guān)于建立內(nèi)地與香港民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助制度的若干問題[A];中國商法年刊第二卷（2002）[C];2002年

6 王吉文;;海牙《協(xié)議選擇法院公約》的影響[A];2006年中國青年國際法學(xué)者暨博士生論壇論文集（國際私法卷）[C];2006年

7 馬樂;;和諧視域中的國際私法——以國際民事司法協(xié)助為視角的考量[A];2008全國博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇（國際法）論文集——國際公法、國際私法分冊[C];2008年

8 鄧永泉;;外國仲裁裁決在中國的承認與執(zhí)行——從執(zhí)行的角度[A];中國仲裁與司法論壇暨2010年年會論文集[C];2010年

9 王承志;徐培強;;香港法院承認與執(zhí)行內(nèi)地仲裁裁決研究[A];規(guī)劃·規(guī)范·規(guī)則——第六屆中國律師論壇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2006年

10 單云娟;周立;;能動司法背景下的民商事案件爭點整理技術(shù)方法分析——以保障審判權(quán)有效運行為視角[A];全國法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 朱s欀，

本文編號：2488014