中國在南海地區(qū)構(gòu)建遠洋群島制度的思考與對策
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-11 18:26
【摘要】：中國在南海地區(qū)的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)長期受到南海周邊國家的肆意侵犯,而被多個大陸國家實踐的大陸國家的遠洋群島制度對中國在南海地區(qū)領(lǐng)土主權(quán)的捍衛(wèi)有重要的價值和意義。大陸國家的遠洋群島制度有充分的國際法和國際習慣的支撐,可以實現(xiàn)國際利益維護和國際社會雙贏的局面。當前國際法院的判例及國際法學者的理論觀點都為中國在南海地區(qū)構(gòu)建大陸國家的遠洋群島制度提供了充足的國際法依據(jù),此外,多個大陸國家的國家實踐對中國南海地區(qū)構(gòu)建大陸國家的遠洋群島制度具有積極的借鑒意義。大陸國家遠洋群島制度構(gòu)建的內(nèi)容在于確定基點和基線,劃定中國在南海地區(qū)的主權(quán)邊界線,以此來緩解因主權(quán)不明促就的南海地區(qū)的復雜局勢。一項制度的確立必須有其積極的實踐價值。中國在南海地區(qū)構(gòu)建大陸國家的遠洋群島制度就是為了解決復雜多變的南海主權(quán)爭端。當前中菲南海爭端被菲律賓訴諸國際法院,此時大陸國家遠洋群島制度的建立對于中國解決中非爭端而言具有現(xiàn)實意義。大陸國家的遠洋群島制度將諸島礁看作一個整體,以整體的形式主張主權(quán),以此為依據(jù)劃定領(lǐng)�；�,取得領(lǐng)海及專屬經(jīng)濟區(qū)。該制度可以回避南海地區(qū)一些島礁依據(jù)《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》難以被認定為島嶼取得領(lǐng)海的情勢。大陸國家遠洋群島制度對于中菲南海爭端的解決也有重要的作用,該理論可以充分詮釋菲律賓提交仲裁主張的四個基礎(chǔ)問題。向國際社會回答了南海領(lǐng)土主權(quán)歸屬于中國的根本原因。大陸國家的遠洋群島制度對中國捍衛(wèi)在南海地區(qū)的主權(quán)而言具有劃時代的重要價值。充分運用大陸國家的遠洋群島制度是中國解決南海主權(quán)問題的新思路,為南海問題的解決提供了新路徑。長當前形勢來看,大陸國家遠洋群島制度的構(gòu)建對解決中菲南海爭端之一當務之急而言至關(guān)重要。但是中菲南海爭端僅僅是中國面對的復雜國際問題的小縮影。南海地區(qū)局勢的復雜多變的介入因素是美國的強勢插手。美國為了維護自身的霸主地位,企圖控制包含南海航道在內(nèi)的世界主要海上戰(zhàn)略高地,高調(diào)介入其他國家的沖突之中。在南海地區(qū),美國為了控制南海航道,阻礙中國的發(fā)展,形成對中國的島鏈封鎖,以支持南海周邊國家主張南海地區(qū)主權(quán)為契機,牽制中國穿過南海走向海洋發(fā)展的道路。為了突破美國的島鏈封鎖,實現(xiàn)中國經(jīng)濟和軍事的發(fā)展,中國必須在新的國際海洋規(guī)則形成過程中占據(jù)主動地位。大陸國家遠洋群島制度的構(gòu)建正是對現(xiàn)存的、脫離時代發(fā)展的一味由海洋大國制定的國際海洋法體系的重構(gòu)與推進。這一制度對解決中國的海洋主權(quán)困境有著顯著的作用。
[Abstract]:China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea has long been arbitrarily violated by the surrounding countries of the South China Sea, and the ocean-going archipelago system of the mainland countries practiced by many mainland countries is of great value and significance to the defence of China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea region. The ocean-going archipelago system of continental countries has the full support of international law and international custom, and can realize the situation of safeguarding international interests and win-win for the international community. The current jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and the theoretical views of international law scholars have provided sufficient basis for international law for China to build a regime of ocean-going islands for mainland countries in the South China Sea. In addition, The state practice of many mainland countries has a positive reference significance for the construction of ocean-going archipelago system in the South China Sea region. The construction of the ocean-going archipelago system in mainland China is to determine the base points and baselines and delineate the boundary of China's sovereignty in the South China Sea in order to alleviate the complex situation in the South China Sea region which is promoted by the unknown sovereignty. The establishment of a system must have its positive practical value. China constructs the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries in the South China Sea to resolve the complex and changeable dispute over sovereignty over the South China Sea. At present, the dispute in the South China Sea between China and the Philippines has been appealed to the International Court of Justice by the Philippines. The ocean-going archipelago regime of continental countries regards the islands and reefs as a whole and claims sovereignty in the form of a whole, based on which territorial sea baselines are drawn and territorial seas and exclusive economic zones are obtained. This system can avoid the situation in which some islands and reefs in the South China Sea are difficult to be regarded as islands acquiring territorial waters under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries also plays an important role in the settlement of the dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea. The theory can fully explain the four basic issues on which the Philippines submitted its arbitration claim. To the international community to answer the South China Sea territorial sovereignty belongs to China's fundamental reasons. The ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is of epoch-making value for China to defend its sovereignty in the South China Sea. Making full use of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is a new way for China to solve the sovereignty problem of the South China Sea and provides a new way for the solution of the problem of the South China Sea. As far as the current situation is concerned, the establishment of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is of paramount importance to the settlement of the Sino-Philippine South China Sea dispute. But the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is only a small microcosm of the complex international problems facing China. The complicated and changeable intervention factor of the situation in the South China Sea is the strong meddling of the United States. In order to maintain its supremacy, the United States is trying to control the world's major maritime strategic highlands, including the South China Sea waterway, and intervene in high-profile conflicts in other countries. In the South China Sea, in order to control the waterway in the South China Sea and hinder the development of China, the United States formed an island chain blockade against China, taking the opportunity of supporting the surrounding countries in the South China Sea to claim sovereignty in the South China Sea, and holding back China's path of crossing the South China Sea into the sea. In order to break through the island chain blockade of the United States and realize China's economic and military development, China must take an active position in the formation of the new international maritime rules. The construction of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is the reconstruction and advancement of the international law of the sea system, which is independent of the development of the times. This system plays a significant role in solving China's maritime sovereignty dilemma.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D993.5
本文編號：2438506
[Abstract]:China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea has long been arbitrarily violated by the surrounding countries of the South China Sea, and the ocean-going archipelago system of the mainland countries practiced by many mainland countries is of great value and significance to the defence of China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea region. The ocean-going archipelago system of continental countries has the full support of international law and international custom, and can realize the situation of safeguarding international interests and win-win for the international community. The current jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and the theoretical views of international law scholars have provided sufficient basis for international law for China to build a regime of ocean-going islands for mainland countries in the South China Sea. In addition, The state practice of many mainland countries has a positive reference significance for the construction of ocean-going archipelago system in the South China Sea region. The construction of the ocean-going archipelago system in mainland China is to determine the base points and baselines and delineate the boundary of China's sovereignty in the South China Sea in order to alleviate the complex situation in the South China Sea region which is promoted by the unknown sovereignty. The establishment of a system must have its positive practical value. China constructs the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries in the South China Sea to resolve the complex and changeable dispute over sovereignty over the South China Sea. At present, the dispute in the South China Sea between China and the Philippines has been appealed to the International Court of Justice by the Philippines. The ocean-going archipelago regime of continental countries regards the islands and reefs as a whole and claims sovereignty in the form of a whole, based on which territorial sea baselines are drawn and territorial seas and exclusive economic zones are obtained. This system can avoid the situation in which some islands and reefs in the South China Sea are difficult to be regarded as islands acquiring territorial waters under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries also plays an important role in the settlement of the dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea. The theory can fully explain the four basic issues on which the Philippines submitted its arbitration claim. To the international community to answer the South China Sea territorial sovereignty belongs to China's fundamental reasons. The ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is of epoch-making value for China to defend its sovereignty in the South China Sea. Making full use of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is a new way for China to solve the sovereignty problem of the South China Sea and provides a new way for the solution of the problem of the South China Sea. As far as the current situation is concerned, the establishment of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is of paramount importance to the settlement of the Sino-Philippine South China Sea dispute. But the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is only a small microcosm of the complex international problems facing China. The complicated and changeable intervention factor of the situation in the South China Sea is the strong meddling of the United States. In order to maintain its supremacy, the United States is trying to control the world's major maritime strategic highlands, including the South China Sea waterway, and intervene in high-profile conflicts in other countries. In the South China Sea, in order to control the waterway in the South China Sea and hinder the development of China, the United States formed an island chain blockade against China, taking the opportunity of supporting the surrounding countries in the South China Sea to claim sovereignty in the South China Sea, and holding back China's path of crossing the South China Sea into the sea. In order to break through the island chain blockade of the United States and realize China's economic and military development, China must take an active position in the formation of the new international maritime rules. The construction of the ocean-going archipelago system of mainland countries is the reconstruction and advancement of the international law of the sea system, which is independent of the development of the times. This system plays a significant role in solving China's maritime sovereignty dilemma.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D993.5
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 任懷鋒;;論區(qū)域外大國介入與南海地區(qū)安全格局變動[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2009年05期
2 王傳軍;區(qū)外大國對南海地區(qū)的滲透及其影響[J];當代亞太;2001年11期
3 邱丹陽;中菲南沙爭端中的美國因素[J];當代亞太;2002年05期
4 王偉;;中國能否沖破“遏制鏈條”[J];領(lǐng)導文萃;2005年11期
5 楊震;周云亨;王萍;;論后冷戰(zhàn)時代美國對中國海權(quán)發(fā)展的制約[J];東北亞論壇;2014年04期
6 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)會議論文 前4條
1 李國麗;王安宇;馮瑞權(quán);;南海地區(qū)降水的四個階段[A];中國氣象學會2005年年會論文集[C];2005年
2 宋明坤;胡亮;李耀東;;南海地區(qū)降水的日變化特征[A];中國氣象學會2008年年會天氣預報準確率與公共氣象服務分會場論文集[C];2008年
3 姚伯初;;南海地區(qū)巖石圈三維速度結(jié)構(gòu)特征[A];青藏高原及鄰區(qū)地質(zhì)與資源環(huán)境學術(shù)討論會論文摘要匯編[C];2003年
4 傅]成;YE Lin;LIN Zhen;;維護中國在南海地區(qū)的國家利益——正名、服務、領(lǐng)導、劃界[A];《中國海洋法學評論》2013年卷第1期[C];2013年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 ;中方一貫致力于維護南海地區(qū)和平與穩(wěn)定[N];人民日報;2011年
2 記者 許棟誠 熊爭艷;我外交部:絕不接受菲方以任何形式非法侵占仁愛礁[N];新華每日電訊;2013年
3 中國南海研究院院長、研究員 吳士存;中國是維護南海地區(qū)和平穩(wěn)定的建設(shè)性力量[N];光明日報;2011年
4 記者 馮愛琴;史地研究彰顯中國在環(huán)南海地區(qū)重要地位[N];中國社會科學報;2013年
5 中國國際問題研究所特聘研究員 賈秀東;中國南海出拳迫不得已[N];人民日報海外版;2012年
6 本報駐美國記者 溫憲;美方再度暴露“渾水摸魚”企圖[N];人民日報;2012年
7 復旦大學美國研究中心主任 沈丁立;和平,美國治下的和平[N];東方早報;2012年
8 周晶璐;印度越南為“共同利益”走近[N];東方早報;2011年
9 本報駐伊斯蘭堡記者 周戎;越印合作不應損害他人[N];光明日報;2011年
10 顏曉敏;菲律賓調(diào)派海軍陸戰(zhàn)隊強化南海軍力[N];東方早報;2012年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 汪美娟;中國在南海地區(qū)構(gòu)建遠洋群島制度的思考與對策[D];華東政法大學;2016年
，本文編號：2438506
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2438506.html
