論《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下的貨物控制權(quán)及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-03 12:00
【摘要】：聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)期研究制定地《聯(lián)合國(guó)全程或部分海上國(guó)際貨物運(yùn)輸合同公約》，已于2008年由聯(lián)合國(guó)大會(huì)第63屆會(huì)議審議通過(guò)。由于該公約的正式簽署發(fā)布地為荷蘭著名的港口城市鹿特丹，因此，也把該公約稱(chēng)為《鹿特丹規(guī)則》。與以往的海上貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域的公約相比，《鹿特丹規(guī)則》創(chuàng)設(shè)了一些新的概念和制度，有關(guān)貨物控制權(quán)制度的規(guī)定是其中最為新穎，也頗具爭(zhēng)議的內(nèi)容。貨物控制權(quán)制度的建立，有助于運(yùn)輸合同與買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同的合理銜接和匹配，也是順應(yīng)現(xiàn)代國(guó)際貿(mào)易方式電子化發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的客觀要求，因此，對(duì)這一權(quán)利進(jìn)行研究，頗具價(jià)值。 本文共分為三部分：引言、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)。正文部分分為四章，分層次對(duì)海上貨物運(yùn)輸中的貨物控制權(quán)制度進(jìn)行研究和探討： 第一部分：貨物控制權(quán)的基本理論。本章中，筆者首先從該制度在既有的部分國(guó)際公約與國(guó)內(nèi)法中的立法現(xiàn)狀入手，結(jié)合《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的相關(guān)規(guī)定，概括出貨物控制權(quán)的概念。然后從理論出發(fā)，分析論證貨物控制權(quán)的權(quán)利性質(zhì)，得出結(jié)論：貨物控制權(quán)是債權(quán)、形成權(quán)。該部分還對(duì)貨物控制權(quán)與中途停運(yùn)權(quán)進(jìn)行比較，從二者的理論來(lái)源、主體、內(nèi)容、行使條件、目的方面進(jìn)行辨析。最后，論述貨物控制權(quán)在買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同與運(yùn)輸合同的匹配上，以及推進(jìn)國(guó)際貿(mào)易方式電子化的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)上所具有的制度價(jià)值。 第二部分：貨物控制權(quán)的主體。結(jié)合《鹿特丹規(guī)則》，重點(diǎn)介紹貨物控制權(quán)的權(quán)利主體，按照簽發(fā)的運(yùn)輸單證的不同性質(zhì)，分別闡述貨物控制權(quán)主體的識(shí)別和轉(zhuǎn)讓規(guī)則。關(guān)于貨物控制權(quán)的義務(wù)主體方面，重點(diǎn)討論履約方是否可以成為貨物控制權(quán)的義務(wù)主體的問(wèn)題。 第三部分：貨物控制權(quán)的內(nèi)容及其行使。在本部分，筆者從對(duì)貨物下達(dá)和變更指示、變更目的港、變更收貨人三個(gè)方面對(duì)貨物控制權(quán)的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行剖析。同時(shí)，本部分還論述了貨物控制權(quán)的行使條件和方式。 第四部分：貨物控制權(quán)制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。在本章，筆者首先分析了貨物控制權(quán)制度在我國(guó)的立法缺失現(xiàn)狀，進(jìn)一步指出這種缺失在實(shí)踐中導(dǎo)致的問(wèn)題和造成的尷尬局面；其次，從理論上分析在我國(guó)建立完整的貨物控制權(quán)制度的必要性和可行性；接著，筆者選取了英美法系與大陸法系中有關(guān)貨物控制權(quán)的具有代表性的國(guó)家之立法，即美國(guó)《統(tǒng)一商法典》中的中途停運(yùn)權(quán)、《德國(guó)商法典》中的貨物處分權(quán)，，對(duì)其權(quán)利規(guī)則構(gòu)造進(jìn)行分析，并總結(jié)其值得借鑒之處；最后，以《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對(duì)于貨物控制權(quán)的構(gòu)建為基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合相關(guān)國(guó)家的先進(jìn)立法，針對(duì)海上貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)奶厥庑�，并著眼于我�?guó)現(xiàn)有立法及海運(yùn)實(shí)踐，為在我國(guó)建立貨物控制權(quán)制度提出立法諫言。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, formulated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law after long-term study, was considered and adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its 63rd session in 2008. The Convention, also known as the Rotterdam rules, is officially signed and published in Rotterdam, the famous port city of the Netherlands. Compared with the previous conventions in the field of carriage of goods by sea, the Rotterdam rules have created some new concepts and systems, among which the regulation of the system of control of goods is the most novel and controversial content. The establishment of the system of control of goods is conducive to the reasonable connection and matching between the contract of carriage and the contract of sale, and is also the objective requirement of the trend of electronic development of modern international trade. Therefore, the study on this right is of great value. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text, conclusion. The main body is divided into four chapters: the first part is the basic theory of the control right of goods, which is divided into four chapters: one is the research and discussion on the control system of goods in the carriage of goods by sea. In this chapter, firstly, the author generalizes the concept of control right of goods from the status quo of legislation in some of the existing international conventions and domestic laws, combining with the relevant provisions of the Rotterdam rules. Then starting from the theory, the right nature of the control right of goods is analyzed and proved, and the conclusion is that the control right of goods is the creditor's right and the right of formation. This part also compares the control right of goods with the right of stoppage in midway, and discriminates from the theoretical source, subject, content, exercise condition and purpose of the two. Finally, this paper discusses the institutional value of the right of control of goods in the match between the contract of sale and the contract of carriage, as well as the development trend of promoting the electronic mode of international trade. The second part: the subject of the control right of goods. Combined with the Rotterdam rules, this paper mainly introduces the subject of the right of control of goods, and expounds the identification and transfer rules of the subject of control of the goods according to the different nature of the transport documents issued. On the subject of the control of goods, this paper mainly discusses whether the performing party can be the subject of the right of control of the goods. The third part: the content and exercise of the control right of goods. In this part, the author analyzes the contents of the control right of the goods from three aspects: issuing and changing instructions to the goods, changing the port of destination and changing the consignee. At the same time, this part also discusses the conditions and ways of exercising the control right of goods. The fourth part: the enlightenment of the system of control of goods to our country. In this chapter, the author first analyzes the status quo of the lack of legislation of the system of control of goods in our country, and further points out the problems and embarrassing situation caused by this lack in practice; Secondly, the necessity and feasibility of establishing a complete control system of goods in our country is analyzed theoretically. Then, the author selects the legislation of the representative countries in the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system concerning the control of goods, that is, the right of stoppage in the United States uniform Commercial Code and the right of disposition of goods in the German Commercial Code. The structure of its rights rules is analyzed, and the reference points are summarized. Finally, on the basis of the construction of the Rotterdam rules for the control of goods, combined with the advanced legislation of the relevant countries, aiming at the particularity of the carriage of goods by sea, and focusing on the existing legislation and maritime transport practice in China, In order to establish the system of control of goods in our country put forward legislative advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294
本文編號(hào)：2433675
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, formulated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law after long-term study, was considered and adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its 63rd session in 2008. The Convention, also known as the Rotterdam rules, is officially signed and published in Rotterdam, the famous port city of the Netherlands. Compared with the previous conventions in the field of carriage of goods by sea, the Rotterdam rules have created some new concepts and systems, among which the regulation of the system of control of goods is the most novel and controversial content. The establishment of the system of control of goods is conducive to the reasonable connection and matching between the contract of carriage and the contract of sale, and is also the objective requirement of the trend of electronic development of modern international trade. Therefore, the study on this right is of great value. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text, conclusion. The main body is divided into four chapters: the first part is the basic theory of the control right of goods, which is divided into four chapters: one is the research and discussion on the control system of goods in the carriage of goods by sea. In this chapter, firstly, the author generalizes the concept of control right of goods from the status quo of legislation in some of the existing international conventions and domestic laws, combining with the relevant provisions of the Rotterdam rules. Then starting from the theory, the right nature of the control right of goods is analyzed and proved, and the conclusion is that the control right of goods is the creditor's right and the right of formation. This part also compares the control right of goods with the right of stoppage in midway, and discriminates from the theoretical source, subject, content, exercise condition and purpose of the two. Finally, this paper discusses the institutional value of the right of control of goods in the match between the contract of sale and the contract of carriage, as well as the development trend of promoting the electronic mode of international trade. The second part: the subject of the control right of goods. Combined with the Rotterdam rules, this paper mainly introduces the subject of the right of control of goods, and expounds the identification and transfer rules of the subject of control of the goods according to the different nature of the transport documents issued. On the subject of the control of goods, this paper mainly discusses whether the performing party can be the subject of the right of control of the goods. The third part: the content and exercise of the control right of goods. In this part, the author analyzes the contents of the control right of the goods from three aspects: issuing and changing instructions to the goods, changing the port of destination and changing the consignee. At the same time, this part also discusses the conditions and ways of exercising the control right of goods. The fourth part: the enlightenment of the system of control of goods to our country. In this chapter, the author first analyzes the status quo of the lack of legislation of the system of control of goods in our country, and further points out the problems and embarrassing situation caused by this lack in practice; Secondly, the necessity and feasibility of establishing a complete control system of goods in our country is analyzed theoretically. Then, the author selects the legislation of the representative countries in the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system concerning the control of goods, that is, the right of stoppage in the United States uniform Commercial Code and the right of disposition of goods in the German Commercial Code. The structure of its rights rules is analyzed, and the reference points are summarized. Finally, on the basis of the construction of the Rotterdam rules for the control of goods, combined with the advanced legislation of the relevant countries, aiming at the particularity of the carriage of goods by sea, and focusing on the existing legislation and maritime transport practice in China, In order to establish the system of control of goods in our country put forward legislative advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法(草案)難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期
2 馬得懿;;FOB條件下賣(mài)方風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)題研究——以托運(yùn)人制度為視角[J];法商研究;2008年04期
3 王威;;港口履約方與海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)的行使[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年08期
4 趙亮;海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)之研[J];世界海運(yùn);2003年05期
5 劉昕;海運(yùn)貨物控制權(quán)問(wèn)題研究——兼評(píng)UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法草案第11章的規(guī)定[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期
6 費(fèi)宏達(dá);;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》視野下FOB條件下賣(mài)方之貨物控制權(quán)[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期
7 向力;;論貨物控制權(quán)——以《鹿特丹規(guī)則》貨物控制權(quán)規(guī)定為中心展開(kāi)[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2010年S1期
8 郭萍;張文廣;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》述評(píng)[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2009年03期
9 ;開(kāi)啟鹿特丹時(shí)代——司玉琢解讀《鹿特丹規(guī)則》[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)洋航務(wù);2009年05期
10 司玉琢;論發(fā)貨人的權(quán)利、義務(wù)和責(zé)任[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2001年00期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 吳瓊;論海上貨物運(yùn)輸中的貨物控制權(quán)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年
2 王中領(lǐng);論海運(yùn)中途停運(yùn)權(quán)[D];上海海事大學(xué);2006年
本文編號(hào)：2433675
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2433675.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
