【摘要】：晚近受惠于改革開放政策與人口紅利的雙重影響，中國經(jīng)濟(jì)急速發(fā)展，繼而成為亞洲，乃至世界經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的動力源泉，吸收外資與對外投資實力進(jìn)一步增強(qiáng)。國際直接投資作為中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展強(qiáng)而有力的推動因素之一，，正日漸受到全世界的共同關(guān)注，同時亦成為國際社會所倡導(dǎo)的一種國際經(jīng)濟(jì)交往形式。雖然中國國內(nèi)學(xué)術(shù)對國際投資領(lǐng)域中的研究日益增多，對于投資協(xié)定中的利益否認(rèn)條款卻鮮有著墨。 本文主要圍繞“什么是國際投資條約中的利益否認(rèn)條款？利益否認(rèn)條款在國際投資爭端仲裁實踐中所表現(xiàn)出的不足，以及引入利益否認(rèn)條款的是否為我國抵御條約選購的唯一選擇�！边@三個方面來展開論述，本文合共分四章： 第一章為國際投資條約中的利益否認(rèn)條款的概述。將從利益否認(rèn)條款的概念及歷史展開論述；通過論述利益否認(rèn)條款的概念，解決“利益否認(rèn)條款是什么”這一問題。然后從利益否認(rèn)條款的發(fā)展歷史，了解利益否認(rèn)條款背后的發(fā)展動因。 第二章將探討利益否認(rèn)條款與最惠國待遇條款及公平與公正待遇條款之間的關(guān)系；投資待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作為國際投資領(lǐng)域中不可或缺的基礎(chǔ)，其與利益否認(rèn)條款存在何種關(guān)系？從最惠國待遇條款在爭端解決程序上的擴(kuò)張適用及公平與公正待遇中合理期待范圍著手，論述這兩項待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與利益否認(rèn)條款的關(guān)系。 第三章通過結(jié)合國際投資實踐中的仲裁案例對利益否認(rèn)條款進(jìn)行分析，主要就仲裁案例所暴露出利益否認(rèn)條款的一些不足之處，如模糊的用語、條款是否具有溯及力等方面都成為投資爭端仲裁實踐的爭議點，就這些方面進(jìn)行反思。 第四章主要論述利益否認(rèn)條款對中國的實際意義，深入探討中國面對投資者實施條約選購行為時，所應(yīng)采取的辦法�，F(xiàn)行國家對條約濫選行為的規(guī)制主要存在改變投資者國籍認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、締約國之間聯(lián)合解釋及刪除或修改投資條約中的投資仲裁條款、引入利益否認(rèn)條款這幾方面進(jìn)行限制。通過對比分析，探討利益否認(rèn)條款是否為中國抑制條約選購現(xiàn)象的唯一選擇。
[Abstract]:Recently, thanks to the dual influence of the reform and opening up policy and the demographic dividend, China's economy has developed rapidly, which has become the driving force of economic development in Asia and even the world. The strength of absorbing foreign capital and investing abroad has been further strengthened. As one of the powerful driving factors of China's economic development, international direct investment (FDI) is being paid more and more attention by the whole world, and has also become a form of international economic communication advocated by the international community. Although China's domestic academic research in the field of international investment is increasing, there is little comment on the profit denial clauses in investment agreements. This paper focuses on "what is the interest denial clause in international investment treaties?" The deficiency of interest denial clause in the practice of international investment dispute arbitration, and whether the introduction of interest denial clause is the only option for our country to resist the purchase of treaties. " This paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the summary of interest denial clause in IIT. This paper discusses the concept and history of interest denial clause, and solves the problem of what interest denial clause is by discussing the concept of interest denial clause. Then, from the development history of interest denial clause, understand the development motivation behind interest denial clause. The second chapter will discuss the relationship between the interest denial clause and the most-favoured-nation treatment clause and the fair and just treatment clause. As an indispensable foundation in the field of international investment, what is the relationship between the interest denial clause and the investment treatment standard? This paper discusses the relationship between the two treatment standards and the benefit denial clause from the view of the extension and application of the most-favoured-nation treatment clause in the dispute settlement procedure and the reasonable expected scope of the fair and just treatment. The third chapter analyzes the interest denial clause by combining the arbitration cases in the international investment practice, mainly on the arbitration cases exposed some shortcomings of the interest denial clauses, such as vague language. Whether the clause has retroactive effect has become the dispute point in the practice of investment dispute arbitration. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the actual significance of the benefit denial clause to China, and probes into the methods that China should take when it faces the investors to carry out the treaty purchase behavior. The existing national regulation of treaty indiscriminate selection mainly includes changing the criterion of investor nationality, jointly interpreting and deleting or modifying the investment arbitration clause in investment treaty, and introducing the interest denial clause to restrict it. Through comparative analysis, this paper discusses whether the benefit denial clause is the only option for China to restrain the phenomenon of treaty purchase.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.4


本文編號：2420605