【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化促進(jìn)了跨國公司的飛速發(fā)展,而這也導(dǎo)致了跨法域破產(chǎn)案件的日益增多。跨法域破產(chǎn)涉及一系列復(fù)雜的程序法和實(shí)體法問題,對于該問題的處理尚存在很大爭議,不同的國家或地區(qū)也有著不同的處理方法。因此跨法域破產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域的法律沖突就特別突出,尤其是管轄權(quán)沖突這一核心問題。 我國是復(fù)合法域國家,香港與內(nèi)地屬于一國之內(nèi)的不同法域,兩地之間存在區(qū)際法律沖突問題。隨著香港與內(nèi)地經(jīng)貿(mào)聯(lián)系的不斷加強(qiáng),在兩地均擁有資產(chǎn)或業(yè)務(wù)的企業(yè)越來越多,涉及到兩地的跨法域破產(chǎn)糾紛也不斷發(fā)生。但是,對該類案件的處理,理論上觀點(diǎn)各異,實(shí)踐中作法不同,這給案件的順利解決帶來了很大的困難。 本文以我國香港與內(nèi)地之間的跨法域破產(chǎn)案件管轄權(quán)的確定為研究對象,通過對跨法域破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)的相關(guān)理論及其他國家、地區(qū)的實(shí)踐做法的探討,以及對香港與內(nèi)地在破產(chǎn)法律制度方面所存在的問題的分析,結(jié)合審判實(shí)踐中的典型案例,最終提出香港與內(nèi)地跨法域破產(chǎn)案件管轄權(quán)沖突的解決對策。本文認(rèn)為,要解決該問題,首先應(yīng)當(dāng)確立破產(chǎn)宣告在兩地間適用“普及主義”,即雙方彼此承認(rèn)對方所做出的破產(chǎn)宣告在己方的效力。除此之外,兩地間應(yīng)當(dāng)合作盡快建立關(guān)于破產(chǎn)案件的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制(包括立法及專門的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)構(gòu))。這也是解決管轄權(quán)沖突的根本對策。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization promotes the rapid development of multinational corporations, which leads to the increasing number of bankruptcy cases across jurisdictions. Cross-jurisdiction insolvency involves a series of complex procedural and substantive law issues, and there are still many disputes over the treatment of this problem, and different countries or regions also have different methods of dealing with it. Therefore, the conflict of laws in the field of cross-jurisdiction insolvency is particularly prominent, especially the core issue of jurisdiction conflict. China is a complex jurisdiction, Hong Kong and the mainland belong to different jurisdictions within one country, and there is a conflict of laws between the two regions. With the strengthening of economic and trade ties between Hong Kong and the mainland, more and more enterprises have assets or businesses in both places. However, the handling of this kind of cases is different in theory and practice, which brings great difficulties to the smooth resolution of cases. This paper takes the determination of the jurisdiction of cross-jurisdiction bankruptcy cases between Hong Kong and the mainland as the research object, and probes into the relevant theories of cross-jurisdiction bankruptcy jurisdiction and the practice of other countries and regions. Based on the analysis of the problems existing in the bankruptcy legal system between Hong Kong and the mainland and the typical cases in the trial practice, the author puts forward the countermeasures to resolve the jurisdiction conflict between Hong Kong and the mainland in the bankruptcy cases. This paper holds that in order to solve this problem, we should first establish the application of "populism" in bankruptcy declaration between the two places, that is, both sides acknowledge the effectiveness of the bankruptcy declaration made by the other party. In addition, the two sides should cooperate to establish a coordination mechanism on bankruptcy cases (including legislation and specialized coordination bodies) as soon as possible. This is also a fundamental solution to the conflict of jurisdiction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.92;D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 馬騰;胡健;;論內(nèi)地與香港跨境破產(chǎn)中的法律沖突及協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評論;2009年01期

2 張憲初;菲利普·斯馬特;;萬事開頭難——《內(nèi)地香港相互認(rèn)可和執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人協(xié)議管轄的民商事案件判決的安排》評析[J];北大法律評論;2007年02期

3 馮霞;試述中國區(qū)際法律沖突的特點(diǎn)及其解決[J];法律適用;1999年04期

4 張憲初;內(nèi)地與香港民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突芻議[J];法律適用;2004年09期

5 賴紫寧;;兩岸民事平行訴訟問題及其解決方法探析[J];法律適用;2008年03期

6 李旺;日本關(guān)于國際破產(chǎn)法律制度的修改[J];法學(xué);2001年11期

7 石靜遐;我國破產(chǎn)程序域外效力的實(shí)例分析——評香港高等法院對“廣信”破產(chǎn)程序的承認(rèn)[J];政法論壇;2002年03期

8 王芳;;香港與內(nèi)地跨境破產(chǎn)的法律框架研究[J];政法論壇;2009年05期

9 石靜遐;中國的跨界破產(chǎn)法:現(xiàn)狀、問題及發(fā)展[J];中國法學(xué);2002年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 欒承昊;試論內(nèi)地與香港民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)沖突及其對策[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2403219