發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-19 19:53

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力的進(jìn)一步解放,生產(chǎn)分工精細(xì)化,我國(guó)進(jìn)入了經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的轉(zhuǎn)型期。轉(zhuǎn)型期矛盾沖突加劇,社會(huì)分層明顯,人們之間的矛盾沖突也隨之顯現(xiàn)出來(lái)。國(guó)際商事仲裁作為解決國(guó)際商事?tīng)?zhēng)議的一種重要方式,對(duì)于我國(guó)的糾紛解決資源的優(yōu)化配置,具有特殊意義,己被國(guó)際社會(huì)普遍認(rèn)可。 本文主要針對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁在解決糾紛的過(guò)程中,遇到的平行程序問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究。本文總共分為四個(gè)大部分：第一部分是國(guó)際商事仲裁中平行程序概述；第二部分是解決國(guó)際商事仲裁中平行程序的途徑——自裁管轄；第三部分是解決國(guó)際商事仲裁中平行程序的途徑——一事不再理；最后一部分是解決國(guó)際商事仲裁中平行程序的途徑——合并仲裁。 文章的第一部分,主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述：首先,闡述了平行程序的概念；然后,闡述了平行程序的表現(xiàn)形式；接著,闡述了國(guó)際商事仲裁平行程序產(chǎn)生的原因；最后,列舉了它的弊端。 文章的第二部分,主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述：首先,闡述了自裁管轄原則的含義；然后,論述了自裁管轄原則的理念；最后,論述了筆者對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建自裁管轄制度的一些建議。 文章的第三部分,主要從一下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述：首先,闡述了一事不再理原則的含義；然后,論述了該原則的理論理念；接著,論述了該原則在國(guó)際商事仲裁中的應(yīng)用及評(píng)價(jià)；最后,論述了筆者對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建一事不再理制度的一些建議。 文章的第四部分,也是最后一部分,主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述：首先,闡述了合并仲裁制度的含義；然后,論述了該制度的理論理念；接著,論述了該制度在國(guó)際商事仲裁平行程序中的應(yīng)用及評(píng)價(jià)；最后,論述了筆者對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建這一制度的一些建議。
[Abstract]:With the further emancipation of social productive forces and the fine division of labor, China has entered the transition period of economic system. Contradictions and conflicts in the transition period intensify, social stratification is obvious, contradictions and conflicts between people also appear. As an important way to settle international commercial disputes, international commercial arbitration has a special significance for the optimal allocation of dispute settlement resources in China, and has been generally recognized by the international community. This paper focuses on the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration in the process of dispute settlement. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration, the second part is the way to solve the parallel procedures in international commercial arbitration-self-adjudication jurisdiction; The third part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration, and the last part is the way to solve the parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration-merger arbitration. The first part of the article mainly discusses the following aspects: firstly, the concept of parallel procedure; then, the manifestation of parallel procedure; then, the causes of parallel procedure in international commercial arbitration; Finally, its disadvantages are listed. The second part of the article, mainly from the following aspects: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction, and then discussed the concept of the principle of self-adjudication jurisdiction; Finally, the author discusses some suggestions on the establishment of self-adjudication jurisdiction system in China. The third part of the article, mainly from the following several aspects to discuss: first, elaborated the meaning of the principle of non bis in idem; Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the principle in international commercial arbitration. The fourth part and the last part of the article mainly discuss the following aspects: first, the meaning of the merger arbitration system, and then, the theoretical concept of the system is discussed. Then, it discusses the application and evaluation of the system in the parallel procedure of international commercial arbitration, and finally, discusses some suggestions on the construction of this system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周清華;;論平行仲裁解決機(jī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年03期

2 周清華;任憲龍;;“默示意思自治”解析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年06期

3 寧敏,宋連斌;評(píng)國(guó)際商事仲裁中的管轄權(quán)原則[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年02期

4 朱克鵬;論國(guó)際商事仲裁中的法院干預(yù)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年04期

5 王斐弘;修改《仲裁法》論綱——以理念、基本原則和具體制度為框架的建構(gòu)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 周清華;;合并仲裁的理性分析[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年03期

7 周清華;李海躍;;以仲裁的價(jià)值取向?yàn)橐暯墙馕鯟IETAC 2005年仲裁規(guī)則[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

8 李莉;合并仲裁及其相關(guān)問(wèn)題[J];求是學(xué)刊;2000年05期

9 高雅;試論國(guó)際商事仲裁協(xié)議的效力認(rèn)定主體——兼評(píng)中國(guó)的立法與實(shí)踐[J];求實(shí);2005年S2期

10 李川;合并仲裁的利弊與規(guī)制[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 丁小軍;國(guó)際商事仲裁管轄權(quán)異議研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

2 王研君;國(guó)際商事仲裁自裁管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2387373