【摘要】：隨著我國將建設(shè)"海上絲綢之路"正式提上日程,進(jìn)出口商對貨物保險(xiǎn)的需求會大大增加,適用于大批量貨物投保的開口保險(xiǎn)合同因而也會在海上貨物運(yùn)輸過程中被廣泛使用。開口保險(xiǎn)合同來源于1906年英國《海上保險(xiǎn)法》規(guī)定的浮動(dòng)保險(xiǎn),而浮動(dòng)保險(xiǎn)也正是開口保險(xiǎn)下的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的開口保險(xiǎn)的前身。開口保險(xiǎn)共有三種類型,且各有特色、可滿足進(jìn)出口商對保險(xiǎn)的不同需求,但是我國目前并沒有法律對開口保險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行規(guī)制。因此,本文通過對中英法律的規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析,并結(jié)合實(shí)務(wù)中的操作,對開口保險(xiǎn)的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行探討,并以此為基礎(chǔ)對開口保險(xiǎn)下被保險(xiǎn)人的申報(bào)義務(wù)、告知義務(wù)等應(yīng)當(dāng)如何規(guī)定進(jìn)行研究,并對開口保險(xiǎn)下保險(xiǎn)證明與保險(xiǎn)合同規(guī)定不一致的情況應(yīng)當(dāng)如何解決進(jìn)行探討,以期能夠?yàn)橄嚓P(guān)立法提出建議。本文共分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分是對海上貨物運(yùn)輸開口保險(xiǎn)的概念與性質(zhì)的研究,作者在這一部分給出了開口保險(xiǎn)的概念,討論了開口保險(xiǎn)合同的性質(zhì),并將開口保險(xiǎn)與浮動(dòng)保險(xiǎn)、預(yù)約保險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行比較,除此之外還對在我國適用開口保險(xiǎn)存在的問題進(jìn)行了介紹。第二部分探討的是被保險(xiǎn)人的告知義務(wù),作者基于英國《1906年海上保險(xiǎn)法》和《2015年保險(xiǎn)法》的規(guī)定,根據(jù)開口保險(xiǎn)的特性,提出立法建議。第三部分是有關(guān)被保險(xiǎn)人的申報(bào)義務(wù),作者分析了中英法律的規(guī)定,對各類型的開口保險(xiǎn)合同下的申報(bào)行為的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了界定,并以此為基礎(chǔ),對我國應(yīng)當(dāng)如何規(guī)定申報(bào)義務(wù)的履行方式提出立法建議。第四部分探討的是保險(xiǎn)證明與開口保險(xiǎn)合同內(nèi)容不一致時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)如何解決。
[Abstract]:With the construction of the "Maritime Silk Road" being put on the agenda in China, the demand for cargo insurance by importers and exporters will increase greatly, and the open insurance contract suitable for large quantities of cargo insurance will also be widely used in the process of sea cargo transportation. The open insurance contract originates from the floating insurance stipulated in the British Marine Insurance Act of 1906, and the floating insurance is the predecessor of the standard open insurance under the open insurance. There are three types of open insurance, and each has its own characteristics, which can meet the different needs of importers and exporters. However, there is no law to regulate open insurance in our country. Therefore, through the analysis of the provisions of Chinese and British laws and combined with the operation in practice, this paper discusses the nature of the opening insurance, and on this basis, the declaration obligations of the insured under the open insurance. How to study how to stipulate the obligation of informing, and how to solve the inconsistency between the insurance certificate and the insurance contract under the open insurance, in order to put forward some suggestions for the relevant legislation. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is the study of the concept and nature of open insurance for the carriage of goods by sea. In this part, the author gives the concept of open insurance, discusses the nature of open insurance contract, and puts forward the open insurance and floating insurance. In addition to the comparison of reservation insurance, the problems existing in the application of open-end insurance in China are introduced. The second part discusses the insurant's obligation to inform. Based on the provisions of the British Marine Insurance Act of 1906 and the Insurance Act of 2015, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions according to the characteristics of open insurance. The third part is about the insurant's declaration obligation. The author analyzes the provisions of Chinese and British laws, defines the nature of the declaration behavior under various types of open insurance contracts, and based on this, This paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on how to fulfill the reporting obligation in our country. The fourth part discusses how to solve the inconsistency between insurance certificate and open-end insurance contract.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊一凡;海上貨物運(yùn)輸開口保險(xiǎn)法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2382025