論中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制的完善
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-07 16:15
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟全球化的進一步加深,各國的利益訴求難以在WTO體制內(nèi)得到調(diào)和,多邊貿(mào)易體制面臨著發(fā)展困境。區(qū)域性經(jīng)濟組織的發(fā)展不僅填補了多邊貿(mào)易體制的不足,而且也促進了全球經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)便是順應(yīng)這種潮流而建立的,加深了自貿(mào)區(qū)內(nèi)經(jīng)貿(mào)合作和成員國間的政治文化交流。隨著自貿(mào)區(qū)發(fā)展,成員間難免遇到很多問題及矛盾。及時化解糾紛,協(xié)調(diào)各國利益對自貿(mào)區(qū)良性發(fā)展具有戰(zhàn)略意義。但是,實踐中各國間更加傾向于運用政治協(xié)商的解決方式。這無疑增加了自貿(mào)區(qū)機制運行的不確定性與不安全因素。尤其是服務(wù)貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域技術(shù)性強且非常復(fù)雜,更加需要一套健全的爭端解決機制作為保障。 本文的寫作目的是探求如何從服務(wù)貿(mào)易角度完善中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制,為自貿(mào)區(qū)服務(wù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展提供制度性的保障�，F(xiàn)有的關(guān)于自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制的文章主要集中于機制整體狀況的論述,而對于具體貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域爭端處理的探討較少。本文試圖通過進一步論述服務(wù)貿(mào)易摩擦處理,以小視野探討中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制的完善。多數(shù)關(guān)于自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制的研究僅專注于機制本身,本文還從機制運行的法律基礎(chǔ)及環(huán)境著手,建議改善機制運行環(huán)境。重點分析中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制的現(xiàn)狀及存在問題,并借鑒其他經(jīng)濟組織的經(jīng)驗探討改進的方法。 實踐證明,中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制不是完美無缺的,其諸多方面有待改進。如對服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制定位不準(zhǔn)確,管理組織不健全,政治性解決方式的規(guī)范性較弱,司法性解決方式的制度化不夠及機制運行的法律基礎(chǔ)不完善等。關(guān)于服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決,主要區(qū)域及多邊經(jīng)濟組織都建立了爭端解決機制,并以一般爭端解決機制作為主體與核心,同時會針對服務(wù)貿(mào)易附加一些特別的規(guī)定。這些制度安排與實踐經(jīng)驗可以為完善自貿(mào)區(qū)爭端解決機制提供重要參考。提高貿(mào)易摩擦處置綜合能力是改進爭端解決機制的方向。改革具體目標(biāo)是提高權(quán)威性、可行性和效率,增加機制的參與度。從宏觀角度看,機制的改進不但要從程序規(guī)則與實體規(guī)范兩方面著手,還需要爭端解決機制與協(xié)調(diào)監(jiān)督等制度緊密配合。從微觀角度看,爭端解決方式改革的要求是司法裁決規(guī)則化及外交談判制度化,并縷清這些方法之間的縱向和橫向關(guān)系。對于上述問題,本文提出了相應(yīng)的措施,如找準(zhǔn)服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制的定位,設(shè)立并完善其組織管理機構(gòu),完善司法性與政治性解決方式,完善機制運行的法律基礎(chǔ)和改善運行環(huán)境等。
[Abstract]:With the further deepening of economic globalization, the interests of various countries are difficult to be reconciled within the WTO system, and the multilateral trading system is facing a dilemma of development. The development of regional economic organizations not only fills the deficiencies of multilateral trading system, but also promotes the development of global economy. China-ASEAN Free Trade area was established in accordance with this trend and deepened the economic and trade cooperation and political and cultural exchanges among member countries. With the development of the Free Trade area, members will inevitably encounter many problems and contradictions. Timely resolution of disputes and coordination of national interests are of strategic significance to the benign development of the Free Trade Zone. However, in practice, countries are more inclined to use the solution of political negotiation. This undoubtedly increases the uncertainty and insecurity of the operation of the Free Trade Zone Mechanism. Especially in the field of trade in services, the technology is strong and very complex, and it needs a set of perfect dispute settlement mechanism as the safeguard. The purpose of this paper is to explore how to perfect the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area from the point of view of service trade so as to provide institutional guarantee for the development of service trade in FTA. The existing articles on the dispute settlement mechanism of free trade area mainly focus on the whole situation of the mechanism, but less on the dispute settlement in the specific trade field. This paper attempts to discuss the perfection of the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area from a small perspective by further discussing the handling of service trade friction. Most of the researches on the dispute settlement mechanism of free trade area only focus on the mechanism itself. This paper also proposes to improve the operating environment of the mechanism from the legal basis and environment of mechanism operation. This paper focuses on the analysis of the present situation and existing problems of the service trade dispute settlement mechanism in the China-ASEAN Free Trade area, and discusses the ways to improve it from the experience of other economic organizations. Practice has proved that the service trade dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area is not perfect, and many aspects need to be improved. For example, the positioning of dispute settlement mechanism of service trade is not accurate, the management organization is not perfect, the standardization of political solution is weak, the institutionalization of judicial settlement is not enough and the legal basis of mechanism operation is not perfect, etc. As for the dispute settlement of trade in services, the main regional and multilateral economic organizations have established the dispute settlement mechanism, and take the general dispute settlement mechanism as the main body and the core. At the same time, some special provisions will be added to the trade in services. These institutional arrangements and practical experience can provide an important reference for perfecting the dispute settlement mechanism in FTAs. Improving the comprehensive ability of trade friction disposal is the direction of improving the dispute settlement mechanism. The specific goal of the reform is to improve authority, feasibility and efficiency, and increase the participation of the mechanism. From the macro point of view, the improvement of the mechanism should be carried out not only from the procedural rules and substantive norms, but also from the system of dispute settlement and coordination and supervision. From the microscopic point of view, the requirements of the reform of dispute settlement methods are the regularization of judicial decisions and the institutionalization of diplomatic negotiations, and the vertical and horizontal relationship between these methods is clarified. For the above problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding measures, such as finding out the position of the dispute settlement mechanism of trade in services, establishing and perfecting its organization and management organization, perfecting the judicial and political solution, Improve the legal basis for the operation of the mechanism and improve the operating environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.1
本文編號：2367449
[Abstract]:With the further deepening of economic globalization, the interests of various countries are difficult to be reconciled within the WTO system, and the multilateral trading system is facing a dilemma of development. The development of regional economic organizations not only fills the deficiencies of multilateral trading system, but also promotes the development of global economy. China-ASEAN Free Trade area was established in accordance with this trend and deepened the economic and trade cooperation and political and cultural exchanges among member countries. With the development of the Free Trade area, members will inevitably encounter many problems and contradictions. Timely resolution of disputes and coordination of national interests are of strategic significance to the benign development of the Free Trade Zone. However, in practice, countries are more inclined to use the solution of political negotiation. This undoubtedly increases the uncertainty and insecurity of the operation of the Free Trade Zone Mechanism. Especially in the field of trade in services, the technology is strong and very complex, and it needs a set of perfect dispute settlement mechanism as the safeguard. The purpose of this paper is to explore how to perfect the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area from the point of view of service trade so as to provide institutional guarantee for the development of service trade in FTA. The existing articles on the dispute settlement mechanism of free trade area mainly focus on the whole situation of the mechanism, but less on the dispute settlement in the specific trade field. This paper attempts to discuss the perfection of the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area from a small perspective by further discussing the handling of service trade friction. Most of the researches on the dispute settlement mechanism of free trade area only focus on the mechanism itself. This paper also proposes to improve the operating environment of the mechanism from the legal basis and environment of mechanism operation. This paper focuses on the analysis of the present situation and existing problems of the service trade dispute settlement mechanism in the China-ASEAN Free Trade area, and discusses the ways to improve it from the experience of other economic organizations. Practice has proved that the service trade dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area is not perfect, and many aspects need to be improved. For example, the positioning of dispute settlement mechanism of service trade is not accurate, the management organization is not perfect, the standardization of political solution is weak, the institutionalization of judicial settlement is not enough and the legal basis of mechanism operation is not perfect, etc. As for the dispute settlement of trade in services, the main regional and multilateral economic organizations have established the dispute settlement mechanism, and take the general dispute settlement mechanism as the main body and the core. At the same time, some special provisions will be added to the trade in services. These institutional arrangements and practical experience can provide an important reference for perfecting the dispute settlement mechanism in FTAs. Improving the comprehensive ability of trade friction disposal is the direction of improving the dispute settlement mechanism. The specific goal of the reform is to improve authority, feasibility and efficiency, and increase the participation of the mechanism. From the macro point of view, the improvement of the mechanism should be carried out not only from the procedural rules and substantive norms, but also from the system of dispute settlement and coordination and supervision. From the microscopic point of view, the requirements of the reform of dispute settlement methods are the regularization of judicial decisions and the institutionalization of diplomatic negotiations, and the vertical and horizontal relationship between these methods is clarified. For the above problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding measures, such as finding out the position of the dispute settlement mechanism of trade in services, establishing and perfecting its organization and management organization, perfecting the judicial and political solution, Improve the legal basis for the operation of the mechanism and improve the operating environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蔣德翠;;中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭端解決機制及中國的對策[J];東南亞縱橫;2011年03期
2 王子昌;東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)與東盟合作機制——東盟合作機制變遷的社會學(xué)考察[J];東南亞研究;2004年06期
3 蔡從燕;;風(fēng)險社會與國際爭端解決機制的解構(gòu)與重構(gòu)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2008年01期
4 孫志煜;;區(qū)域經(jīng)貿(mào)爭端解決的制度與實踐——以中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)為例[J];法學(xué)評論;2011年01期
5 廖增金;洪英利;;中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機制之比較分析[J];法制與社會;2010年05期
6 傅明;張訥;;論《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》之分散型爭端解決機制[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學(xué)刊;2006年02期
7 徐運良;;論WTO爭端解決機制與RTAs爭端解決機制相互承認(rèn)裁決的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學(xué)刊;2007年04期
8 王軍敏;試論服務(wù)貿(mào)易的概念[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;1995年12期
9 余敏友;王追林;;改革開放30年來我國對外貿(mào)易法制的建設(shè)與發(fā)展[J];國際貿(mào)易;2008年11期
10 李珊;;中國——東盟爭端解決機制的特征[J];廣西青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年06期
，本文編號：2367449
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2367449.html
