【摘要】：隨著國際經(jīng)濟(jì)交往的加強(qiáng)和國際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展,國際民商事爭議也隨之增多。涉外民商事訴訟與國際商事仲裁作為解決爭議的兩種主要方式,經(jīng)常會出現(xiàn)沖突,在實(shí)踐中如何梳理兩者之間的關(guān)系,避免和消除兩者的法律沖突,不僅是理論界應(yīng)該加以探討和研究的,更需要各國實(shí)踐實(shí)務(wù)界加以努力,兼具理論和實(shí)際價(jià)值。 本文第一章從民事訴訟中的管轄權(quán)入手,分析管轄權(quán)的重要性及其背后所涉及的法律實(shí)益,并對國際私法中的管轄權(quán)概念進(jìn)行闡述,分析管轄權(quán)概念在商事仲裁中的轉(zhuǎn)借使用,接著對涉外民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)的根據(jù)及其沖突的解決原則進(jìn)行分析,最后再詳細(xì)闡述國際商事仲裁管轄權(quán)的三個(gè)必要要件。 本文第二章對兩種管轄權(quán)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了深入辨析,首先找出二者的聯(lián)系之處,其次分析二者的區(qū)別,包括理論根據(jù)不同、權(quán)力享有者不同、確定原則不同、沖突頻率不同、以及法律效果不同幾個(gè)方面;其次探討了仲裁管轄權(quán)的擴(kuò)張化趨勢,接著說明了法院對仲裁管轄權(quán)的司法支持和監(jiān)督情況。最后探討兩種管轄權(quán)沖突產(chǎn)生的根本原因,并以真實(shí)案例的形式列舉了沖突的表現(xiàn),為后文協(xié)調(diào)和解決沖突作準(zhǔn)備。 本文第三章從司法對國際商事仲裁的監(jiān)督的角度進(jìn)行了比較法研究,包括三個(gè)方面,一是司法介入商事仲裁趨勢改變的比較研究,二是兩種管轄權(quán)異議的比較研究,三是沖突解決途徑——“并存控制”制度的比較研究,為我們處理好兩種沖突提供了思路和大方向。 本文第四章對我國解決涉外民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)和國際商事仲裁管轄權(quán)沖突的機(jī)制構(gòu)建做了一個(gè)設(shè)想,首先從立法層面對相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行明確,其次對國內(nèi)外實(shí)踐中已經(jīng)操作過的經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行了梳理,最后通過相關(guān)規(guī)則和制度的完善推進(jìn)法院與仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的機(jī)制銜接,最終促成從立法到實(shí)踐操作的動態(tài)協(xié)調(diào)和解決沖突機(jī)制的建立。
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of international economic exchanges and the development of international trade, international civil and commercial disputes also increase. As two main ways to settle disputes, civil and commercial litigation involving foreign affairs and international commercial arbitration are often in conflict. In practice, how to sort out the relationship between the two, to avoid and eliminate the legal conflicts between the two, It is not only the theoretical circles that should explore and study, but also the practical circles of various countries to work hard, both theoretical and practical value. The first chapter of this paper begins with jurisdiction in civil action, analyzes the importance of jurisdiction and the legal benefits involved in it, and expounds the concept of jurisdiction in private international law, and analyzes the transfer of jurisdiction concept in commercial arbitration. Then it analyzes the basis of jurisdiction of civil and commercial litigation concerning foreign affairs and the principles of resolving conflicts, and finally expounds in detail the three essential elements of jurisdiction of international commercial arbitration. The second chapter makes a deep analysis of the relationship between the two kinds of jurisdiction, first of all, finds out the connection between the two, and then analyzes the differences between the two, including different theoretical basis, different holders of power, different principles of determination, different frequency of conflict. And different aspects of legal effect; Secondly, it discusses the expansion trend of arbitration jurisdiction, and then explains the court's judicial support and supervision of arbitration jurisdiction. Finally, this paper discusses the root causes of the two conflicts of jurisdiction, and lists the manifestations of the conflicts in the form of real cases in order to prepare for the coordination and resolution of conflicts in the future. The third chapter makes a comparative study on the judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration, including three aspects: one is the comparative study of the trend of judicial intervention in commercial arbitration, the other is the comparative study of two kinds of jurisdictional objections. The third is the comparative study of the conflict resolution approach-"coexistence control" system, which provides us with the train of thought and general direction to deal with the two conflicts well. In the fourth chapter, the author makes a tentative plan to construct the mechanism of resolving the conflicts between civil and commercial litigation jurisdiction and international commercial arbitration jurisdiction in China. Firstly, it clarifies the relevant issues from the legislative level. Secondly, it combs the experience that has been operated in practice at home and abroad. Finally, through the perfection of relevant rules and systems, it promotes the connection of the mechanism between the court and the arbitration institution. Finally, the dynamic coordination from legislation to practice and the establishment of conflict resolution mechanism are promoted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.4;D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張曉莉;楊威;;區(qū)際民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突的立法協(xié)調(diào)[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

2 王藝;;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管轄權(quán)消極沖突的解決[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

3 顏林;;論多邊公約體系下的國際民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突及其解決[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;2008年05期

4 李海瀅;;涉外腐敗犯罪刑事管轄權(quán)沖突問題研究——以中國為視角的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年03期

5 劉s，

本文編號：2359368