發(fā)布時間：2018-11-16 14:51

【摘要】：國際投資領域,最惠國待遇概括來說是指東道國對外國投資者實行的待遇不低于其已經給予或將給予第三國投資者的待遇。目前有效的投資條約,對最惠國待遇標準能否擴張適用于投資爭端解決的程序事項未作明確規(guī)定,因此對此問題無論在理論上還是司法實踐中均存在困境和爭議。 本文運用分析和比較的方法,主要從理論、實踐方面,對最惠國待遇擴大適用對爭端解決程序的影響和我國可以采取的防范措施等問題進行了探討。 文章一共分為四個部分:第一部分從理論方面對一般意義及國際投資領域中的最惠國待遇的基本含義、適用范圍等進行了分析,回顧了最惠國待遇原則的起源,以典型案例“Maffezini v. Spain”案為主要切入點,討論最惠國待遇擴張適用于投資爭端解決程序的問題產生過程及隨之而來的理論上的模糊和爭議,對最惠國待遇擴大適用加以界定;第二部分從ICSID的仲裁實踐入手,對支持和反對最惠國待遇擴大適用的觀點和理由進行歸納,并對爭議的一些焦點問題比如條約的解釋方法、對優(yōu)惠的認定等進行了探討;第三部分以現(xiàn)有的投資條約中的程序事項的規(guī)定為基礎,分析了最惠國待遇擴大適用對爭端解決程序適用的影響;第四部分立足我國締約實踐,提出采取防范措施的建議,包括在立法中明確我國的立場,根據(jù)締約國家的不同情況采用不同的規(guī)定,同時關注條約溯及力的問題,運用溯及力原則對最惠國待遇的擴大適用加以限制,提高自身參與國際爭端解決的能力,以降低因條約規(guī)定不明給我國際投資活動帶來的風險。
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, MFN treatment generally refers to the treatment that the host country has given or will give to foreign investors. Whether the MFN standard can be extended to the settlement of investment disputes is not clearly stipulated in the current effective investment treaties, so there are difficulties and disputes in both theory and judicial practice. By means of analysis and comparison, this paper discusses the influence of the extended application of most-favoured-nation treatment on the dispute settlement procedure and the preventive measures that can be taken by our country from the aspects of theory and practice. The article is divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the general meaning and the basic meaning and application scope of MFN treatment in the field of international investment, and reviews the origin of MFN principle. Taking the typical case of "Maffezini v. Spain" as the main breakthrough point, this paper discusses the process of the expansion of MFN treatment in the process of investment dispute settlement and the theoretical ambiguity and controversy that follows, and defines the extended application of MFN treatment. The second part starts with the arbitration practice of ICSID, summarizes the viewpoints and reasons of supporting and opposing the application of MFN, and probes into some key issues in dispute, such as the interpretation method of treaties, the confirmation of preferential treatment and so on. The third part, based on the provisions of the existing investment treaties on procedural matters, analyzes the impact of the expanded application of MFN treatment on the application of dispute settlement procedures; The fourth part is based on the practice of contracting in our country, and puts forward some suggestions of taking preventive measures, including clarifying our country's position in legislation, adopting different provisions according to the different situations of the contracting countries, and paying attention to the retroactive effect of the treaty at the same time. The principle of retroactive effect is applied to restrict the application of MFN treatment and to improve its ability to participate in the settlement of international disputes so as to reduce the risks brought to our international investment by the unspecified provisions of treaties.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 劉小吾;;解讀公共政策[J];湖南社會科學;2009年04期

2 余勁松;外資的公平與公正待遇問題研究——由NAFTA的實踐產生的幾點思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期

3 徐崇利;;從實體到程序:最惠國待遇適用范圍之爭[J];法商研究;2007年02期

4 張振華;;國際投資協(xié)定中最惠國待遇條款的新發(fā)展與中國的應對之策[J];湖南財經高等�？茖W校學報;2008年06期

5 沈志韜;;論國際投資仲裁正當性危機[J];時代法學;2010年02期

6 劉用安;;立法技術:精無止境[J];人民政壇;2009年10期

7 張光;;論國際投資仲裁中非投資國際義務的適用進路[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2009年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 盧鑠棟;最惠國條款適用于爭端解決程序事項問題研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

2 劉遠志;投資爭端仲裁上訴機制研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2335818