【摘要】：國際私法賴以存在的基礎(chǔ)是涉外民商事關(guān)系中承認(rèn)外國法的域外效力,并根據(jù)沖突規(guī)范的指引而適用外國法。但是在國際私法中有一項(xiàng)重要的制度,就是“公共秩序保留制度”。它是為限制和排除外國法在本國的適用而制定的,其目的是為了維護(hù)本國的社會公共利益,二者顯然是相互矛盾的。然而縱觀整個國際私法的發(fā)展史,我們不難看出,國際私法的發(fā)展是在一方面適用外國法,一方面限制或排除適用外國法的矛盾中前進(jìn)的。 “公共秩序保留制度”在各國適用缺乏統(tǒng)一規(guī)則的控制和引導(dǎo),這會直接導(dǎo)致各國法官在判案時自由裁量權(quán)的擴(kuò)大,從而損害到司法的公正和法律的權(quán)威,這會降低國際私法在協(xié)調(diào)各國法律沖突中的價值。 本文從公共秩序保留制度的概念和內(nèi)涵出發(fā),探究了這一制度在國際私法中的作用、適用條件及排除外國法后的法律適用問題。對于公共秩序保留制度,不僅需要有相應(yīng)的限制規(guī)定,還要防止法官自由裁量權(quán)的濫用。 我國對于公共秩序保留制度,是持肯定態(tài)度的,但也存在很多問題和不足。我國要從立法上對其加以規(guī)范,彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有法律的不足。
[Abstract]:The existence of private international law is based on the recognition of the extraterritorial effects of foreign laws in civil and commercial relations involving foreign countries and the application of foreign laws according to the guidance of conflict norms. However, there is an important system in private international law, that is, the reservation of public order. It is made to limit and exclude the application of foreign law in our country, and its purpose is to safeguard the social and public interests of our country. However, throughout the history of private international law, it is not difficult to see that the development of private international law advances in the contradiction of the application of foreign law on the one hand and the restriction or exclusion of the application of foreign law on the other. The lack of control and guidance of uniform rules in the application of the "Public order Reservation system" will directly lead to the expansion of the discretion of judges in the adjudication of cases, thereby undermining the justice of justice and the authority of the law. This reduces the value of private international law in reconciling conflicts of laws between countries. Starting from the concept and connotation of public order reservation system, this paper probes into the role of this system in private international law, the applicable conditions and the legal application after excluding foreign law. For the reservation of public order, not only should there be corresponding restrictions, but also the abuse of the judge's discretion should be prevented. Our country holds the affirmative attitude to the public order reservation system, but also has many problems and the insufficiency. Our country should regulate it from the legislation, make up the deficiency of the existing law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甘華玖;公共秩序保留制度的限制適用[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期

2 屈廣清;曲波;;公共秩序保留與弱勢群體權(quán)利的保護(hù)[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

3 徐青森;;2000年國際私法研究的回顧與展望[J];法學(xué)家;2001年01期

4 金正佳 ,郭生平;涉外海事審判中的法律適用[J];法學(xué)評論;1989年06期

5 張瀟劍;國際私法上的公共政策機(jī)制之剖析[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年04期

6 李健男，，呂國民;對公共秩序保留制度的反思與展望[J];法學(xué)評論;1996年04期

7 江龍兵;;淺析公共秩序保留制度[J];法制與社會;2008年32期

8 姚楊;;淺議我國公共秩序保留制度[J];法制與社會;2011年06期

9 楊威;令狐情;;海峽兩岸區(qū)際沖突法中公共秩序保留制度的和諧發(fā)展[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

10 徐偉功;國際私法中的自由裁量權(quán)論綱[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 沈涓;[N];財(cái)經(jīng)時報(bào);2004年

本文編號：2320903