論國際私法中的公共秩序保留制度
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-04 17:54
【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)理論和現(xiàn)有的研究指出,公共秩序保留制度對于一些國外法律的限制連帶著維護的程度還有針對于法院所提出的“公共秩序”具有很大的作用。對于國際私法而言,某些法律制度相對比較落后,沒有新意。國際私法中的公共秩序保留制度在調和不同的國際私法關系發(fā)揮著十分突出的作用。但是在長時間的歷史演化過程中,有關公共秩序保留制度的研究仍然存在一定的誤解,即使這些理論都可以利用法律規(guī)則來解釋,但是也的確造成一定程度的概念混亂和學術研究價值不高。從根本上說,這些研究很長時間沒有得到理念上的更新,而且還影響人們對于國際私法的認識,由此,系統(tǒng)的發(fā)展維護公共秩序保留制度的目的便更清晰。這個制度是有一定意義的,因為這個制度對于國際私法的發(fā)展還是有很大的影響。由于這種機制的存在,拒絕外國法律適用的法律亦可以理解是“法律”,以減少國家之間不必要的爭端和沖突。本文第一部分介紹了公共秩序的基本定義、功能和意義三個方面。對公共秩序的定義的研究,應該是動態(tài)和靜態(tài)兩方面的。動態(tài)的觀點是:對于公共秩序保留制度(一種基本的制度和體系)而言,國際私法可用于外國法律制度;靜態(tài)的觀點是:要從一個社會或國家的利益和基本的預算制度的作用來看。本課題第二部分基于公共秩序保留制度,簡要關鍵的回憶了有關社會道德和責任的法律理論知識。比如,存在于公共秩序里的有關道德的衡量的概念,積極和消極的作用;維護好公安機關的權力,剝奪外國法律的治權;以及治外法權。在第三大塊中詳細的介紹了有關國家立法的內(nèi)容,并且解釋了有關公共秩序保留制度中不同體系國家的立法問題。本課題第四塊通過司法實踐明顯的表現(xiàn)出有關中國的公共秩序保留制度的一系列問題,系統(tǒng)分析中國的公共秩序保留制度在當今國際化的安全形勢。針對存在的問題,本課題提出相應立法和司法實踐的解決辦法,盡我們最大的努力不斷地促進國際私法中有關公共秩序保留制度的蛻變。長期以來,對公共秩序的相關研究仍然是法律現(xiàn)象本身的一個矛盾點。外國法律的機制和應用將不被視為“合法的”,以減少爭端和許多國家之間的不必要的沖突,從而更大限度的促進世界和平的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The traditional theory and existing research point out that the system of public order reservation has great effect on the restriction of some foreign laws and the degree of maintenance, as well as the "public order" put forward by the court. For private international law, some legal systems are relatively backward and have no new ideas. The system of public order reservation in private international law plays a prominent role in reconciling different private international law relations. However, in the long history of evolution, there are still some misunderstandings about the system of public order reservation, even though these theories can be explained by legal rules. But it does cause a certain degree of conceptual confusion and academic research value is not high. Fundamentally, these studies have not been updated in concept for a long time, and also affect people's understanding of private international law, thus, the purpose of systematic development and maintenance of public order reservation system is clearer. This system is meaningful because it still has a great influence on the development of private international law. As a result of the existence of such a mechanism, the law denying the application of foreign law can also be understood as "law" in order to reduce unnecessary disputes and conflicts between States. The first part introduces the basic definition, function and significance of public order. The research on the definition of public order should be dynamic and static. The dynamic view is that private international law can be used in foreign legal systems for the reservation of public order (a basic system and system); The static view is to look at the interests of a society or nation and the role of a basic budget system. The second part of this thesis is based on the public order reservation system, briefly and critically recalls the legal theory knowledge about social morality and responsibility. For example, the concept of moral measurement, which exists in public order, plays a positive and negative role; maintains the power of public security organs and deprives foreign laws of their jurisdiction; and extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the third part, it introduces the content of national legislation in detail, and explains the legislation of different systems in the system of public order reservation. The fourth part of this paper shows a series of problems about China's public order reservation system through judicial practice, and systematically analyzes the international security situation of China's public order reservation system. In view of the existing problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative and judicial practice solutions, and does our best to promote the transformation of the reservation system of public order in private international law. For a long time, the research on public order is still a contradiction of the legal phenomenon itself. The mechanisms and applications of foreign laws will not be considered "legitimate" in order to reduce disputes and unnecessary conflicts between many countries, thereby further promoting the peaceful development of the world.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D997
本文編號：2310688
[Abstract]:The traditional theory and existing research point out that the system of public order reservation has great effect on the restriction of some foreign laws and the degree of maintenance, as well as the "public order" put forward by the court. For private international law, some legal systems are relatively backward and have no new ideas. The system of public order reservation in private international law plays a prominent role in reconciling different private international law relations. However, in the long history of evolution, there are still some misunderstandings about the system of public order reservation, even though these theories can be explained by legal rules. But it does cause a certain degree of conceptual confusion and academic research value is not high. Fundamentally, these studies have not been updated in concept for a long time, and also affect people's understanding of private international law, thus, the purpose of systematic development and maintenance of public order reservation system is clearer. This system is meaningful because it still has a great influence on the development of private international law. As a result of the existence of such a mechanism, the law denying the application of foreign law can also be understood as "law" in order to reduce unnecessary disputes and conflicts between States. The first part introduces the basic definition, function and significance of public order. The research on the definition of public order should be dynamic and static. The dynamic view is that private international law can be used in foreign legal systems for the reservation of public order (a basic system and system); The static view is to look at the interests of a society or nation and the role of a basic budget system. The second part of this thesis is based on the public order reservation system, briefly and critically recalls the legal theory knowledge about social morality and responsibility. For example, the concept of moral measurement, which exists in public order, plays a positive and negative role; maintains the power of public security organs and deprives foreign laws of their jurisdiction; and extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the third part, it introduces the content of national legislation in detail, and explains the legislation of different systems in the system of public order reservation. The fourth part of this paper shows a series of problems about China's public order reservation system through judicial practice, and systematically analyzes the international security situation of China's public order reservation system. In view of the existing problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding legislative and judicial practice solutions, and does our best to promote the transformation of the reservation system of public order in private international law. For a long time, the research on public order is still a contradiction of the legal phenomenon itself. The mechanisms and applications of foreign laws will not be considered "legitimate" in order to reduce disputes and unnecessary conflicts between many countries, thereby further promoting the peaceful development of the world.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D997
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張婧yN;;我國公共秩序保留制度的立法分析及完善建議[J];法制與社會;2017年04期
2 齊凱悅;;公共秩序保留制度在我國涉外法律適用中的界定[J];法制與社會;2013年35期
3 馬為;;淺析公共秩序保留[J];商;2013年15期
4 劉叢;;淺析公共秩序保留制度在我國的適用[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2012年22期
5 曾加;呂東鋒;;論港澳臺地區(qū)公共秩序保留制度的適用及其對我國大陸的啟示[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2012年06期
6 侯微微;;簡析我國關于公共秩序保留制度的立法[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2012年19期
7 劉儒雅;;淺談公共秩序保留在司法實踐中的一些問題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2012年09期
8 唐征玲;;論我國公共秩序保留制度的立法缺陷及其完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年07期
9 李金忠;;公共秩序保留制度在我國運用的回顧與前瞻[J];法制與社會;2009年02期
10 張曉婷;;從公共秩序保留制度簡論國際公共秩序與國內(nèi)公共秩序之區(qū)分——兼談相關公共秩序保留制度立法建議[J];法制與社會;2008年23期
，本文編號：2310688
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2310688.html
