【摘要】：歐盟的反傾銷法是目前世界上最全面最完備的反傾銷法,其中規(guī)定的反吸收法律制度是目前獨(dú)一無(wú)二的,是十分有特色的一項(xiàng)法律制度。這項(xiàng)制度作為反傾銷法律制度的延伸,保障了采取反傾銷措施的效果。到目前為止只有歐盟對(duì)反吸收法律制度做了詳盡的規(guī)定,其他國(guó)家的立法在反吸收法律制度方面仍然是空白,我國(guó)也是如此。而近年來(lái)歐盟對(duì)我國(guó)的反吸收調(diào)查越來(lái)越頻繁,研究歐盟的反吸收法律制度可以為我國(guó)防止和應(yīng)對(duì)反吸收提供借鑒。 本文揭示了反吸收法律制度的特點(diǎn),分析了其優(yōu)點(diǎn)和濫用反吸收調(diào)查的后果。從立案、調(diào)查和調(diào)查結(jié)果三方面分析歐盟反吸收法律制度的實(shí)體性和程序性規(guī)定。分析我國(guó)面臨的嚴(yán)峻形勢(shì)和頻遭反吸收調(diào)查的原因,在此基礎(chǔ)上從政府、企業(yè)、行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)三方面入手提出應(yīng)對(duì)歐盟反吸收調(diào)查的對(duì)策。 本文主要運(yùn)用了以下研究方法：第一,文獻(xiàn)研究的方法。本文在分析反吸收法律制度時(shí),閱讀并翻譯了歷年來(lái)歐盟對(duì)反吸收法律制度的規(guī)定,翻閱相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),深入研究該制度的特點(diǎn)。第二,比較研究方法,在分析反吸收法律制度時(shí),與其他近似地法律制度進(jìn)行比較,更加深入的剖析其本質(zhì)。 反吸收法律制度作為一項(xiàng)先進(jìn)的制度,在貿(mào)易保護(hù)愈演愈烈的情況下,必然會(huì)為越來(lái)越多的國(guó)家采用。所以我國(guó)必須深入研究歐盟的反吸收法律制度,本文在分析的前提下提出了有針對(duì)性的對(duì)策,避免我國(guó)企業(yè)在應(yīng)對(duì)反吸收調(diào)查時(shí)措手不及,使我國(guó)企業(yè)在應(yīng)訴時(shí)能有備無(wú)患,在反吸收訴訟中獲得較好的結(jié)果,進(jìn)而保護(hù)國(guó)內(nèi)相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)在國(guó)際市場(chǎng)上的份額,維護(hù)我國(guó)利益。
[Abstract]:EU antidumping law is the most comprehensive and complete antidumping law in the world at present. As an extension of anti-dumping legal system, this system guarantees the effect of anti-dumping measures. Up to now, only the EU has made detailed provisions on the anti-absorption legal system, and the legislation of other countries is still blank in the aspect of anti-absorption legal system, and so is our country. In recent years, the EU has made more and more investigations on China's backabsorption, so the study of EU's anti-absorption legal system can provide a reference for our country to prevent and deal with the anti-absorption. This paper reveals the characteristics of the reverse absorption legal system, analyzes its advantages and the consequences of abuse of the reverse absorption investigation. This paper analyzes the substantive and procedural provisions of the EU's anti-absorption legal system from three aspects: filing, investigation and investigation results. Based on the analysis of the severe situation faced by China and the reasons for the frequent backabsorption investigation, the countermeasures to deal with the EU anti-absorption investigation are put forward from three aspects: government, enterprises and trade associations. This article mainly uses the following research methods: first, the literature research method. In the analysis of the reverse absorption legal system, this paper read and translated the European Union's regulations on the reverse absorption legal system over the years, looked through the relevant literature, and studied the characteristics of the system in depth. Second, the comparative research methods, in the analysis of the reverse absorption of the legal system, compared with other similar legal systems, more in-depth analysis of its essence. As an advanced system, the anti-absorption legal system will be adopted by more and more countries. Therefore, our country must deeply study the EU's anti-absorption legal system. This paper puts forward targeted countermeasures under the premise of analysis, so as to avoid our enterprises being caught off guard when dealing with counter-absorption investigations, so that our enterprises can be prepared and free from trouble when responding to lawsuits. Better results can be obtained in the counterabsorption litigation, thus protecting the share of domestic related industries in the international market and safeguarding the interests of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D922.295;F752.02

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 劉勇;;WTO成員并未承擔(dān)防止和避免“傾銷”的條約義務(wù)[A];《WTO法與中國(guó)論壇》文集——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)年會(huì)論文集（八）[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 傅莘;反吸收[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2002年

2 ;墨西哥反傾銷法律制度[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2003年

3 黃文俊;我國(guó)反傾銷法律制度日趨完善[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2003年

4 李溯婉;中國(guó)紡織品首遭歐盟反吸收調(diào)查[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

5 馮源;企業(yè)要慎重應(yīng)對(duì)歐盟反吸收調(diào)查[N];經(jīng)理日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

6 夏廷;歐盟的進(jìn)口反吸收調(diào)查[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2003年

7 肖堯;反吸收調(diào)查是反傾銷復(fù)審的一種形式[N];中國(guó)貿(mào)易報(bào);2006年

8 谷儉泰;歐盟終止對(duì)我節(jié)能燈反吸收調(diào)查[N];中國(guó)國(guó)門(mén)時(shí)報(bào);2004年

9 王錦;紡織出口企業(yè)需獨(dú)立應(yīng)對(duì)反吸收調(diào)查[N];中國(guó)企業(yè)報(bào);2007年

10 本報(bào)記者　 李寧;企業(yè)慎防歐盟反吸收調(diào)查[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉揚(yáng)揚(yáng);歐盟反吸收法律制度研究及我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

2 邢雅君;論我國(guó)反傾銷法律制度的完善[D];延邊大學(xué);2011年

3 張萍;反傾銷法中的反規(guī)避問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

4 張麗;我國(guó)反傾銷稅措施應(yīng)用及完善的法律思考[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

5 鄭麗娜;WTO規(guī)則下我國(guó)反傾銷立法與實(shí)踐的研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

6 周怡;歐盟反吸收制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

7 何海軍;歐盟反吸收法律問(wèn)題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

8 梁敏;反傾銷法律制度下的反規(guī)避問(wèn)題研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

9 宋東霞;中歐紡織品貿(mào)易摩擦問(wèn)題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

10 張周飛;國(guó)際服務(wù)貿(mào)易對(duì)貨物貿(mào)易反傾銷制度的借鑒研究[D];西南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2304416