《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下承運人的陸上區(qū)段責(zé)任
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-22 19:10
【摘要】：隨著全球化的進程,國際貿(mào)易變得越來越普遍。國際間貨物運輸?shù)姆绞揭搽S之產(chǎn)生了很多新變化�！伴T到門”的運輸形式變得越來越普遍。為了促進全球經(jīng)濟一體化的進程,世界各國都認識到國際貨物運輸法律規(guī)范的統(tǒng)一必不可少。但在實際不中,目前對于國際間貨物運輸?shù)姆墒只靵y,更是沒有一項可以調(diào)節(jié)“門到門”式運輸?shù)膰H公約,《鹿特丹規(guī)則》就在此情況下應(yīng)運而生。 1996年,聯(lián)合國國際貿(mào)易法委員會《UNCITRAL》委托國際海事委員會《CMI》起草新的國際公約。經(jīng)多年的努力,終于在2008年11月17日,聯(lián)合國第63屆會議審議并通過了《全程或部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》,并在2009年9月23日在荷蘭鹿特丹舉行開放簽署儀式,并將其稱為“鹿特丹規(guī)則”,同時吁請各國政府考慮成為公約的締約國。 《鹿特丹規(guī)則》初衷作為一份海運公約,與以往的三大公約最大的不同這一就在于它不單調(diào)整海上運輸部分,還對其它的運輸方式進行調(diào)整,是一份“海運+其他”的運輸公約,《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的生效勢必會對現(xiàn)有的其他運輸運輸方式產(chǎn)生一定的影響。而對于貨物運輸來講,承運人制度的有關(guān)規(guī)定是重要的內(nèi)容。因此,本文就以陸上運輸為重點對《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的生效對相關(guān)的承運人的影響做以分析： 第一、第二章,分析了《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下承運人的定義及識別方法、及承運人的責(zé)任區(qū)間和責(zé)任形式。并將《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中的有關(guān)規(guī)定與現(xiàn)有的海運公約及我國國內(nèi)法的有關(guān)規(guī)定進行了比較。 第三章,對目前主要的適用于陸上運輸區(qū)段的貨物運輸公約做了簡要介紹。 第四章,將《鹿特丹規(guī)則》與現(xiàn)有的主要的適用于陸上運輸區(qū)段的貨物運輸公約中關(guān)于承運人責(zé)任的規(guī)定做了詳盡的比較,包括承運人的免責(zé)事由、賠償限額等方面。 第五章,對《鹿特丹規(guī)則》何時能適用于陸上運輸區(qū)段,該如何適用的問題做了相關(guān)分析。
[Abstract]:With the process of globalization, international trade has become more and more common. The mode of international cargo transportation has also produced many new changes. Door-to-door transport is becoming more and more common. In order to promote the process of global economic integration, countries all over the world recognize that the unification of the legal norms of the international carriage of goods is essential. But in practice, the current law on the international carriage of goods is very confusing, and there is no international convention regulating door-to-door transport. The Rotterdam rules came into being in this context. In 1996, The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) commissioned the International Maritime Commission (CMI) to draft new international conventions. After years of efforts, on 17 November 2008, the 63rd session of the United Nations considered and adopted the Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, and held an open signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Calling on governments to consider becoming parties to the Convention. The Rotterdam rules were originally intended as a maritime convention, The biggest difference from the previous three conventions is that it not only adjusts the maritime transport component, but also adjusts other modes of transport. The entry into force of Rotterdam rules is bound to have an impact on other existing modes of transport. For the carriage of goods, the relevant provisions of the carrier system is an important content. Therefore, this paper makes an analysis of the impact of the entry into force of the Rotterdam rules on the carriers concerned with the emphasis on land transport: first, chapter two, the definition and identification method of the carrier under the Rotterdam rules are analyzed. And the carrier's liability zone and form of liability. The relevant provisions of the Rotterdam rules are compared with the existing maritime conventions and the relevant provisions of China's domestic law. Chapter three briefly introduces the main conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport. In Chapter 4, the Rotterdam rules are compared with the main provisions on carrier's liability in the existing conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport, including the carrier's exemption, the limitation of compensation, and so on. The fifth chapter analyzes when the Rotterdam rules can be applied to the section of land transport and how to apply them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.19
本文編號：2288052
[Abstract]:With the process of globalization, international trade has become more and more common. The mode of international cargo transportation has also produced many new changes. Door-to-door transport is becoming more and more common. In order to promote the process of global economic integration, countries all over the world recognize that the unification of the legal norms of the international carriage of goods is essential. But in practice, the current law on the international carriage of goods is very confusing, and there is no international convention regulating door-to-door transport. The Rotterdam rules came into being in this context. In 1996, The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) commissioned the International Maritime Commission (CMI) to draft new international conventions. After years of efforts, on 17 November 2008, the 63rd session of the United Nations considered and adopted the Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, and held an open signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Calling on governments to consider becoming parties to the Convention. The Rotterdam rules were originally intended as a maritime convention, The biggest difference from the previous three conventions is that it not only adjusts the maritime transport component, but also adjusts other modes of transport. The entry into force of Rotterdam rules is bound to have an impact on other existing modes of transport. For the carriage of goods, the relevant provisions of the carrier system is an important content. Therefore, this paper makes an analysis of the impact of the entry into force of the Rotterdam rules on the carriers concerned with the emphasis on land transport: first, chapter two, the definition and identification method of the carrier under the Rotterdam rules are analyzed. And the carrier's liability zone and form of liability. The relevant provisions of the Rotterdam rules are compared with the existing maritime conventions and the relevant provisions of China's domestic law. Chapter three briefly introduces the main conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport. In Chapter 4, the Rotterdam rules are compared with the main provisions on carrier's liability in the existing conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport, including the carrier's exemption, the limitation of compensation, and so on. The fifth chapter analyzes when the Rotterdam rules can be applied to the section of land transport and how to apply them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.19
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 常子軒;論國際海上貨物運輸?shù)姆蓻_突[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期
2 郭萍;張文廣;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》述評[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2009年03期
3 張湘蘭;向力;;《全程或者部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》對條約沖突的應(yīng)對[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期
4 廖詩評;;條約解釋方法在解決條約沖突中的運用[J];外交評論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報);2008年05期
5 司玉琢;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的評價與展望[J];中國海商法年刊;2009年Z1期
6 朱曾杰;;初評《鹿特丹規(guī)則》[J];中國海商法年刊;2009年Z1期
7 許碩;;鹿特丹規(guī)則下貨物控制權(quán)的性質(zhì)辨析[J];中州大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 陳艷;海上貨物運輸承運人責(zé)任制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號：2288052
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2288052.html
