論《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》中賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-18 09:23
【摘要】：在日益頻繁的國際貿(mào)易往來中，賣方對貨物進(jìn)行權(quán)利擔(dān)保是非常重要的一項制度。權(quán)利擔(dān)保制度，是指賣方應(yīng)保證對其出售的貨物享有合法的權(quán)利。換言之，它要求賣方保證所交付的貨物沒有“法律上的瑕疵”或“法律上的障礙”，不受任何第三方的干擾。權(quán)利擔(dān)保義務(wù)的內(nèi)容在1980年《聯(lián)合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》（以下簡稱公約）中主要體現(xiàn)在兩個方面：一是物權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)，二是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的擔(dān)保義務(wù)。本文僅針對后者進(jìn)行研究，其主要規(guī)定體現(xiàn)在公約第42條，即賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)條款。 賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)是指賣方保證所交付的貨物不存在任何第三方的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，并且任何第三方也不會就該貨物向買方主張任何知識產(chǎn)權(quán)。這種權(quán)利擔(dān)保是隨著社會發(fā)展而出現(xiàn)的新情形，在國際貨物買賣中的情況更為復(fù)雜。主要由于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)其“無形性”、“地域性”等區(qū)別于傳統(tǒng)物權(quán)、債權(quán)領(lǐng)域的特殊性，使得知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定及知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易比有形財產(chǎn)在相同情況下復(fù)雜得多。設(shè)立賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)制度，對于維護(hù)現(xiàn)代交易的安全，，保障合同雙方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益，減少不必要的損失顯得十分有必要，研究賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)制度對于促進(jìn)我國的相關(guān)立法和減少國際貿(mào)易實務(wù)中的法律摩擦同樣具有十分重要的意義。 作者撰寫此文，分為四個章節(jié)： 第一章總體介紹公約第42條的立法背景。介紹兩大法系對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)，然后以此為基礎(chǔ)分析了公約第42條的立法史。 第二章對公約中賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)的積極方面進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)解讀。分為四部分：第一部分討論賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)的范圍，第二部分分析賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)發(fā)生的時間，第三部分對“第三方”的權(quán)利介入進(jìn)行分類分析，第四部分解析賣方違反知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)義務(wù)時買方行使權(quán)利的條件與途徑。 第三章分析了公約中賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)的消極方面。有兩方面的內(nèi)容：地域標(biāo)準(zhǔn)限制和主觀因素限制。 第四章討論公約中賣方知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)規(guī)定對我國相關(guān)立法的借鑒。
[Abstract]:In the increasingly frequent international trade, the seller to guarantee the goods is a very important system. The right guarantee system means that the seller shall guarantee the lawful rights to the goods sold by him. In other words, it requires the seller to guarantee that the goods delivered are free of "legal defects" or "legal obstacles" and free from interference by any third party. The content of the right to guarantee obligation is mainly reflected in two aspects in the 1980 United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods (hereinafter referred to as the Convention): one is the obligation of security interests, the other is the obligation of security of intellectual property. This paper only focuses on the latter, the main provisions of which are embodied in article 42 of the Convention, namely the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation clause. The seller's obligation to guarantee intellectual property rights means that the seller guarantees that the goods delivered do not have the intellectual property of any third party and that any third party will not claim any intellectual property right against the buyer in respect of the goods. This kind of right guarantee is the new situation which appears along with the social development, in the international goods sale situation is more complicated. Mainly because intellectual property rights are "invisible", "regional" and so on, they are different from traditional property rights and the particularity of the field of creditor's rights, which makes the protection of intellectual property rights. Intellectual property infringement and intellectual property trading are much more complex than tangible property in the same circumstances. The establishment of the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation system is necessary for safeguarding the security of modern transactions, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of both parties to the contract, and reducing unnecessary losses. It is also of great significance to study the system of seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation to promote the relevant legislation of our country and to reduce the legal friction in international trade practice. This article is composed of four chapters: the first chapter introduces the legislative background of article 42 of the Convention. This paper introduces the obligations of intellectual property security in two legal systems, and then analyzes the legislative history of Article 42 of the Convention. The second chapter systematically interprets the positive aspects of seller's intellectual property rights obligation in the Convention. It is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the scope of the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation, the second part analyzes the time when the seller's intellectual property security obligation occurs, the third part classifies the right intervention of "third party". The fourth part analyzes the conditions and ways for the buyer to exercise his rights when the seller violates the obligations of intellectual property rights. The third chapter analyzes the negative aspects of the seller's intellectual property rights obligation. There are two aspects of the content: regional standards and subjective constraints. The fourth chapter discusses the provisions of the seller's intellectual property rights obligations for reference to China's relevant legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.1
本文編號：2278693
[Abstract]:In the increasingly frequent international trade, the seller to guarantee the goods is a very important system. The right guarantee system means that the seller shall guarantee the lawful rights to the goods sold by him. In other words, it requires the seller to guarantee that the goods delivered are free of "legal defects" or "legal obstacles" and free from interference by any third party. The content of the right to guarantee obligation is mainly reflected in two aspects in the 1980 United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods (hereinafter referred to as the Convention): one is the obligation of security interests, the other is the obligation of security of intellectual property. This paper only focuses on the latter, the main provisions of which are embodied in article 42 of the Convention, namely the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation clause. The seller's obligation to guarantee intellectual property rights means that the seller guarantees that the goods delivered do not have the intellectual property of any third party and that any third party will not claim any intellectual property right against the buyer in respect of the goods. This kind of right guarantee is the new situation which appears along with the social development, in the international goods sale situation is more complicated. Mainly because intellectual property rights are "invisible", "regional" and so on, they are different from traditional property rights and the particularity of the field of creditor's rights, which makes the protection of intellectual property rights. Intellectual property infringement and intellectual property trading are much more complex than tangible property in the same circumstances. The establishment of the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation system is necessary for safeguarding the security of modern transactions, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of both parties to the contract, and reducing unnecessary losses. It is also of great significance to study the system of seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation to promote the relevant legislation of our country and to reduce the legal friction in international trade practice. This article is composed of four chapters: the first chapter introduces the legislative background of article 42 of the Convention. This paper introduces the obligations of intellectual property security in two legal systems, and then analyzes the legislative history of Article 42 of the Convention. The second chapter systematically interprets the positive aspects of seller's intellectual property rights obligation in the Convention. It is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the scope of the seller's intellectual property rights guarantee obligation, the second part analyzes the time when the seller's intellectual property security obligation occurs, the third part classifies the right intervention of "third party". The fourth part analyzes the conditions and ways for the buyer to exercise his rights when the seller violates the obligations of intellectual property rights. The third chapter analyzes the negative aspects of the seller's intellectual property rights obligation. There are two aspects of the content: regional standards and subjective constraints. The fourth chapter discusses the provisions of the seller's intellectual property rights obligations for reference to China's relevant legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李玉文,方秀云;平行進(jìn)口:知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與貿(mào)易自由化的沖突[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2000年03期
2 黎國梁;論出賣人的權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任[J];安康師專學(xué)報;2005年01期
3 梁慧星;論出賣人的瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任[J];比較法研究;1991年03期
4 侯淑波;賣方對出售貨物的權(quán)利擔(dān)保責(zé)任[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年08期
5 張仁開;當(dāng)代國際技術(shù)貿(mào)易發(fā)展的新態(tài)勢與新格局[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2004年10期
6 李皓,余翔,方放;歐洲法院版權(quán)權(quán)利耗盡及平行進(jìn)口判例研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年02期
7 尹鋒林;;歐盟專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口規(guī)則研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年07期
8 劉夏;;論國際貿(mào)易合同法中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保[J];法制與社會;2007年07期
9 梅潔;論國際貨物買賣中對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利擔(dān)保[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期
10 營文中;;國際貨物買賣中賣方的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保義務(wù)[J];江西科技師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期
本文編號：2278693
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2278693.html
