【摘要】："一帶一路"是中國在新的全球時代背景下的一項偉大工程,惠及國家眾多。在中國的主導下,一定會對全球的相關(guān)經(jīng)濟和貿(mào)易往來的新格局產(chǎn)生深遠的影響。而區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定是實現(xiàn)"一帶一路"的重要的手段與工具,而較為穩(wěn)健有效的爭端解決機制設(shè)計與實施是區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定落地最為重要的核心要素,也是能否順利實現(xiàn)"一帶一路"的關(guān)鍵。"一帶一路"途經(jīng)的各國地緣政治復(fù)雜、國情各異,如何解決彼此間簽署的區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定爭端勢必是我們所關(guān)注的重點。如何在現(xiàn)有的法律框架下搭建可運行高效的爭端解決機制,如何運用各種法律手段來推進所簽署貿(mào)易協(xié)定權(quán)利義務(wù)的完全落實,都是我們應(yīng)該關(guān)注的難點和重點。本文即針對此難點,對現(xiàn)有國際和國內(nèi)的區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定的相關(guān)爭端機制進行比較分析,從協(xié)定文本的制定和實踐落實情況的良好程度分別對中國目前爭端解決機制和世界其它區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定爭端解決機制進行比較分析后做出評價,進而提出在"一帶一路"新視角下,中國擬簽署的區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定的爭端解決機制的新建構(gòu)。筆者分別對WTO爭端解決機制、歐盟簽署區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定爭端解決機制、北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定等傳統(tǒng)且落實優(yōu)良的國際組織或國際區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定形式的爭端機制的比較分析上,立足于當下的國際司法大環(huán)境,同時對中國已簽署的自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的爭端解決機制歸納總結(jié)上,提出筆者對于"一帶一路"下的區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定的爭端解決機制的架構(gòu)的可行性建議。
[Abstract]:Belt and Road is a great project for China in the new global era, benefiting many countries. Under China's leadership, it will have a profound impact on the new pattern of global economic and trade relations. Regional trade agreement is an important means and tool to realize "Belt and Road", and the design and implementation of more stable and effective dispute settlement mechanism is the most important core element of the landing of regional trade agreement. It is also the key to the smooth realization of Belt and Road. " Belt and Road's geopolitics and national conditions are different, so how to resolve the disputes between them is the focus of our attention. How to set up an efficient dispute settlement mechanism under the existing legal framework and how to use various legal means to promote the full implementation of the rights and obligations of signed trade agreements are the difficulties and key points that we should pay attention to. In view of this difficulty, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the existing international and domestic RTAs' dispute mechanisms. After comparing and analyzing the current dispute settlement mechanism of China and the dispute settlement mechanism of other regional trade agreements in the world, the author makes an evaluation from the good degree of the formulation of the text of the agreement and the implementation of the agreement in practice. Then, under the new angle of view of Belt and Road, the new construction of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement to be signed by China is put forward. The author makes a comparative analysis of the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism signed by the European Union and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Based on the current international judicial environment, and at the same time summing up the dispute settlement mechanism of the free trade agreement that China has signed, The author puts forward some feasible suggestions on the framework of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement under Belt and Road.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李冰漪;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)想背后的現(xiàn)實考量[J];中國儲運;2015年03期

2 王敬文;;一帶一路新戰(zhàn)略[J];管理觀察;2015年03期

3 包運成;;“一帶一路”建設(shè)的法律思考[J];前沿;2015年01期

4 蔣德翠;謝岳峰;;國際投資爭端解決機制新趨勢及中國的對策[J];商業(yè)時代;2014年33期

5 張莉;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略應(yīng)關(guān)注的問題及實施路徑[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào)導刊;2014年27期

6 張?zhí)N嶺;;聚焦一帶一路大戰(zhàn)略[J];大陸橋視野;2014年08期

7 王海運;趙常慶;李建民;孫壯志;A.B.奧斯特洛夫斯基;聶書嶺;楊恕;李新;楊成;張恒龍;陳利君;陳繼東;王維然;潘志平;樸鍵一;范麗君;張寧;王海燕;肖斌;吳宏偉;;“絲綢之路經(jīng)濟帶”構(gòu)想的背景、潛在挑戰(zhàn)和未來走勢[J];歐亞經(jīng)濟;2014年04期

8 戴興泓;;國際爭端解決機制現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];社會科學家;2012年06期

9 李晶珠;;中國引入臨時仲裁的制約因素及其克服[J];黑龍江社會科學;2010年05期

10 胡曉紅;;中外雙邊投資協(xié)定爭端解決機制模式選擇——以中國與上合組織成員國間BITs為視角[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 佘能梅;歐盟自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定爭端解決機制研究[D];西南政法大學;2013年

2 鄭晨星;《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》投資爭端仲裁機制研究[D];外交學院;2009年

，

本文編號：2262343