發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-09 13:15

【摘要】：中國(guó)2008年《專利法》在第69條中允許專利產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口。對(duì)是否允許專利產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口的問題，TRIPS協(xié)議進(jìn)行了回避，交由各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法解決，在實(shí)踐中對(duì)此問題的態(tài)度往往取決于各國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和貿(mào)易政策，各國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐中有不同的判例。我國(guó)允許專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口，在國(guó)內(nèi)利與弊并存，在國(guó)際上可能面臨發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家外交和貿(mào)易的威脅。針對(duì)我國(guó)所面臨的問題，本文從專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口基本理論和司法實(shí)踐入手，借鑒歐盟專利權(quán)區(qū)域耗盡的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)在中國(guó)東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)建立專利權(quán)區(qū)域耗盡可行性進(jìn)行了研究，對(duì)《TRIPS與公共健康多哈宣言》的形成過程進(jìn)行研究，探討聯(lián)合廣大發(fā)展中國(guó)家推動(dòng)國(guó)際條約修改，，使專利權(quán)國(guó)際耗盡原則普遍適用。從理論上、司法實(shí)踐上研究允許專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口相關(guān)依據(jù)，是否允許專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口不單純是一個(gè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)理論問題，而是一個(gè)關(guān)乎一國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和貿(mào)易政策的問題。以市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中各方主體利益為研究視角，對(duì)我國(guó)允許專利平行進(jìn)口后所帶來的負(fù)面影響進(jìn)行分析，提出解決問題的辦法，做好防范工作防患于未然，使這一立法新成果真正服務(wù)于我國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步和經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:In Article 69 of the 2008 Patent Law of China, parallel imports of patented products are permitted. The question of whether to allow parallel import of patented products has been evaded and referred to the domestic laws of various countries. In practice, the attitude to this issue often depends on the economic interests and trade policies of each country. There are different precedents in the judicial practice of various countries. China allows the parallel import of patent products, which has both advantages and disadvantages, and may face the threat of diplomacy and trade in developed countries. In view of the problems faced by our country, this paper starts with the basic theory and judicial practice of parallel import of patented products, and draws lessons from the practical experience of regional depletion of patent rights in the EU. This paper studies the feasibility of establishing patent region depletion in China-ASEAN Free Trade area, studies the forming process of TRIPS and Doha Declaration on Public Health, and discusses the cooperation of developing countries in promoting the revision of international treaties. The principle of international exhaustion of patent rights is universally applicable. In theory, judicial practice studies the relevant basis of allowing parallel import of patent products. Whether to allow parallel import of patented products is not simply a theoretical issue of intellectual property, but a problem related to the economic interests and trade policies of a country. From the perspective of the main interests of all parties in the market economy, this paper analyzes the negative effects brought by the parallel import of patents in China, puts forward solutions to the problems, and does a good job of prevention and prevention. Make this legislation new achievement to serve our country technology progress and economic construction truly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：G306.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李玉文,方秀云;平行進(jìn)口:知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與貿(mào)易自由化的沖突[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

2 張今;歐盟平行進(jìn)口與商標(biāo)權(quán)保護(hù)的新進(jìn)展[J];中華商標(biāo);2001年04期

3 馬樂;劉亞軍;;平行進(jìn)口法律規(guī)制的再思考——以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)獨(dú)占許可為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期

4 陳海浪;楊思哲;馬遙;;專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口不同立法的價(jià)值取向分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年17期

5 朱元成;;新《專利法》第69條關(guān)于平行進(jìn)口問題的立法探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年35期

6 余翔;專利權(quán)窮竭與專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口——?dú)W共體法律、實(shí)踐及相關(guān)理論剖析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2000年02期

7 余翔;扭曲發(fā)展——臺(tái)灣地區(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利耗盡與平行進(jìn)口體制解析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2002年06期

8 張永艾;權(quán)利窮竭原則探究——兼論平行進(jìn)口問題[J];河北法學(xué);2004年03期

9 師華,黃羨玲;TRIPS協(xié)議彈性條款與中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立法的完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2003年10期

10 武蘭芬;姜軍;余翔;;專利產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口政策對(duì)社會(huì)福利的影響及我國(guó)對(duì)策研究[J];科研管理;2006年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡濱斌;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)限制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2259466