【摘要】：近年來,各國為吸引外國投資,保護對外投資,紛紛簽訂了雙邊投資協(xié)定,即Bilateral Investment Treaties,或者其他國際投資協(xié)定,即International Investment Agreements,并在這種條約中訂入有關(guān)投資者和東道國爭議解決的條款。一般來說,爭議的解決或者依賴國內(nèi)行政和司法手段,或者依靠國際仲裁�；陔p邊投資協(xié)定或者其他國際投資協(xié)定爭議解決條款項下的仲裁,一方面保護了投資者的利益,另一方面可能給國家?guī)沓林氐呢摀?因此,處理國際仲裁和東道國國內(nèi)救濟之間的關(guān)系就顯得十分重要。 雙邊投資條約投資者和東道國爭議解決條款規(guī)定的仲裁場所,主要是ICSID,適用ICSID附加便利規(guī)則的仲裁庭和適用UNCITRAL的臨時仲裁庭。本文第二部分將就投資者與東道國爭議解決的方式進行討論。 雙邊投資條約的仲裁條款主要表現(xiàn)為無規(guī)定型,二者擇一型,國內(nèi)程序放棄型,平行程序容許型和國內(nèi)救濟程序先行型幾種。各種類型對投資者選擇國際仲裁和國內(nèi)救濟的情況進行了不同規(guī)定。本文第三部分將結(jié)合案例和現(xiàn)行BITs/IIAs進行分析。 同時作為資本輸出國和資本輸入國的我國,應該區(qū)分情況選擇爭議解決條款的具體表現(xiàn)形式,以盡可能保護我國投資者的海外投資,同時降低我國面對國際仲裁負累的危險。本文第四部分將著重論述。
[Abstract]:In recent years, in order to attract foreign investment and protect foreign investment, various countries have signed bilateral investment agreements, that is, Bilateral Investment Treaties, or other international investment agreements. International Investment Agreements, does not include in such treaties provisions relating to investor and host country dispute settlement. In general, dispute resolution depends either on domestic administrative and judicial means, or on international arbitration. Arbitration based on bilateral investment agreements or other IIAS dispute settlement clauses, on the one hand, protects the interests of investors, on the other hand, may place a heavy burden on countries, so, It is very important to deal with the relationship between international arbitration and the domestic remedies of the host country. The arbitration place stipulated in the dispute settlement clause between the investor and the host country of bilateral investment treaty is mainly the arbitration tribunal that ICSID, applies the additional convenience rule of ICSID and the temporary arbitration tribunal that applies UNCITRAL. The second part of this paper will discuss the way to settle the dispute between investor and host country. The arbitration clauses of bilateral investment treaties (bits) are mainly expressed as "non-prescriptive" type, "alternative" type, "domestic procedure waiver" type, "parallel procedure permissible" type and "domestic relief procedure first type". Various types of investors to choose international arbitration and domestic remedies for different provisions. The third part of this article will combine the case and the present BITs/IIAs to carry on the analysis. At the same time, as a capital exporting country and a capital importing country, China should choose the specific form of dispute settlement clause according to the situation, so as to protect the overseas investment of Chinese investors as far as possible, and at the same time reduce the risk of our country facing the burden of international arbitration. The fourth part of this paper will focus on the discussion.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 田豐;;中美雙邊投資協(xié)定對中國經(jīng)濟的影響——基于美國雙邊投資協(xié)定范本(2004)的分析[J];當代亞太;2010年03期

2 王楠;;淺析近年來中外雙邊投資協(xié)定的若干特點及問題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年06期

3 胡曉紅;;中外雙邊投資協(xié)定爭端解決機制模式選擇——以中國與上合組織成員國間BITs為視角[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2009年02期

4 李先平;;雙邊投資協(xié)定中的爭端解決條款研究——我國應在何種程度上接受ICSID的管轄權(quán)[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2011年01期

5 許敏;;論ICSID投資仲裁對雙邊投資協(xié)定中的最惠國待遇條款的發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2009年03期

6 周釩革;;雙邊投資條約對ICSID“同意”的影響[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2007年10期

7 金佳卉;;論我國雙邊投資協(xié)定中的仲裁條款[J];大眾商務(wù);2009年14期

8 梁詠;;雙邊投資協(xié)定與中國對外直接投資安全問題研究[J];投資研究;2008年09期

9 李萬強,徐群;國家財產(chǎn)的執(zhí)行豁免問題新探[J];西北師大學報(社會科學版);2002年05期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉京蓮;阿根廷國際投資仲裁危機的法理與實踐研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 劉群;論國家主權(quán)的有限豁免[D];華東政法學院;2005年

，

本文編號：2258955