【摘要】：全球化是當今客觀存在的社會現(xiàn)象,對全球化的不同定義說明全球化具有多維度的特征,這種多維度主要表現(xiàn)在以下幾點:一是經(jīng)濟要素的全球配置;二是社會治理結(jié)構(gòu)的變化;三是信息高度一體化;四是人口的全球流動;五是生態(tài)環(huán)境的全球影響與治理;六是全球的文化交流。經(jīng)濟全球化是全球化的最初表現(xiàn),也是全球化其他方面的動力。全球化引起了全方位的社會變革,理論界也因為主權(quán)受到全球化的影響對主權(quán)進行了熱烈的探討。 主權(quán)是一個歷史的概念,它不是從來就有的。資本主義從產(chǎn)生的那一天起就是世界性的,只不過這種世界性到今天才明顯的表現(xiàn)出來,也就是說資本主義的本質(zhì)就是全球化。根據(jù)經(jīng)濟基礎決定上層建筑的原理,主權(quán)理論的嬗變與資本主義不同的發(fā)展階段有著大致對應的關系。在資本主義萌芽時期,因為資產(chǎn)階級自身實力的弱小,所以他們與君主聯(lián)合,借助君主的力量來實現(xiàn)商品經(jīng)濟發(fā)展所需要統(tǒng)一市場的目標,在此背景下君主主權(quán)理論誕生了。君主主權(quán)理論認為君主的主權(quán)是絕對的、無限的,為君主建立統(tǒng)一的國家和國內(nèi)市場提供了理論上的支持。在資本主義確立發(fā)展時期,資產(chǎn)階級與君主的聯(lián)盟因為封建主義與資本主義之間的矛盾而破裂,資本主義經(jīng)過前期的發(fā)展已經(jīng)羽翼豐滿,而以君主為代表的封建制度已經(jīng)成為資本主義進一步發(fā)展的障礙,因此,資產(chǎn)階級以人民主權(quán)理論為工具,推翻了封建政權(quán),建立資產(chǎn)階級政權(quán)。而到了資本主義全球擴張時期,國內(nèi)統(tǒng)一的市場已經(jīng)無法滿足資本主義發(fā)展的需要,資本主義急需向外擴張以滿足自己對原材料和市場的需要,作為其反對封建主義的人民主權(quán)理論已經(jīng)成為其對外擴張的絆腳石,而廣大的發(fā)展中國家通過發(fā)展、豐富主權(quán)理論的內(nèi)涵——諸如民族自決權(quán)、經(jīng)濟主權(quán)、文化主權(quán)的提出,反對資本主義國家的殖民統(tǒng)治、維護自己經(jīng)濟、文化等方面的主權(quán)。因此,世界上出現(xiàn)了關于兩種不同主權(quán)觀的聲音。一方面是資本主義國家為了把全球變成他的工廠和市場開始提出的弱化甚至是否定主權(quán)的理論;另一方面是發(fā)展中國家要求強化主權(quán)的聲音。 從上述主權(quán)理論的嬗變過程我們可以清楚地看到,主權(quán)理論是為政治服務的工具,是結(jié)合國家、社會具體情形的可變。主權(quán)并不像當代西方國家所說的那樣已經(jīng)過時,弱化或否定主權(quán)的理論實質(zhì)是為資本主義國家進行全球擴張服務的。資本主義國家之間的交流仍然遵循著主權(quán)原則,歐盟就是一個很好的例證。歐盟是在成員國同意讓渡一部分主權(quán)的前提下形成的,但這種主權(quán)讓渡的實質(zhì)是主權(quán)行使權(quán)的讓渡,因此目前歐盟應該是一個過渡性的政府間組織,而不是超國家組織或聯(lián)邦式實體。 因此,在全球化的背景下,國家主權(quán)應該以積極的、能動的姿態(tài)理性地加以回應和應對,這包括國家主權(quán)觀念、結(jié)構(gòu)的變化。而中國應該結(jié)合自己的國情,采取理性的應對措施,融入到全球化的進程中,在發(fā)展自己的同時也較好地維護本國的利益。
[Abstract]:Globalization is an objective social phenomenon nowadays. Different definitions of globalization show that globalization has multi-dimensional characteristics, which are mainly manifested in the following aspects: first, the global allocation of economic factors; second, the change of social governance structure; third, the high integration of information; fourth, the global flow of population; fifth, the ecological environment. Globalization is the initial manifestation of globalization, and it is also the driving force of other aspects of globalization. Globalization has brought about all-round social changes, and the theoretical circles have carried out a heated discussion on sovereignty because of the influence of globalization on sovereignty.
Sovereignty is a historical concept, it is not always there. Capitalism has been worldwide since the day it came into being, but this worldwide nature has only been manifested to this day. That is to say, the essence of capitalism is globalization. According to the principle that economic basis determines superstructure, the evolution of sovereignty theory and capitalist ownership In the embryonic period of capitalism, because of the weakness of the bourgeoisie's own strength, they united with the monarch to achieve the goal of unified market for the development of commodity economy by means of the monarch's power. Under this background, the theory of monarchy was born. The sovereignty of the monarch is absolute and infinite, which provides theoretical support for the monarch to establish a unified state and domestic market.During the period of the establishment and development of capitalism, the alliance between the bourgeoisie and the monarch broke up because of the contradiction between feudalism and capitalism, and capitalism has been full-fledged in its early development, while the monarch has been taken as its own. The feudal system represented by the bourgeoisie has become an obstacle to the further development of capitalism. Therefore, the bourgeoisie overthrew the feudal regime and established the bourgeois regime with the tool of the theory of human democratic rights. Expansion to meet their own needs for raw materials and markets has become a stumbling block to their external expansion as their anti-feudalism theory of people's sovereignty. The vast number of developing countries, through development, enrich the connotation of sovereignty theory - such as the right of national self-determination, economic sovereignty, cultural sovereignty, against the capitalist countries Therefore, there are two different views of sovereignty in the world. On the one hand, the theory of weakening or even denying sovereignty that capitalist countries began to put forward in order to turn the world into their factories and markets; on the other hand, the voice of developing countries demanding strengthening sovereignty. Sound.
From the evolution of the above-mentioned sovereignty theory, we can clearly see that the theory of sovereignty is a tool for political service, a combination of state and social changes. Exchanges between capitalist countries still follow the principle of sovereignty, and the EU is a good example. The EU is formed on the premise that the member states agree to transfer part of their sovereignty, but the essence of this transfer is the transfer of sovereignty exercise power. Therefore, the EU should be a transitional intergovernmental organization, not a super-state. Family organization or federal entity.
Therefore, under the background of globalization, the state sovereignty should respond and respond rationally with a positive and dynamic attitude, including the change of the concept and structure of state sovereignty. Interest.
【學位授予單位】：中南民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D992

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 劉偉麗,李偉;全球化與反全球化觀點評述[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2001年10期

2 信春鷹，張燁;全球化結(jié)社革命與社團立法[J];法學研究;1998年03期

3 托尼·麥克格魯,陳家剛;走向真正的全球治理[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實;2002年01期

4 劉杰,黃仁偉;試論國際機制下國家主權(quán)的可變性與適應性[J];上海社會科學院學術(shù)季刊;1999年01期

，

本文編號：2244825