中國對中菲南海爭端案仲裁庭管轄權(quán)提出反對的效果辨析
發(fā)布時間:2018-09-14 19:05
【摘要】:不管中方是否提出管轄權(quán)異議,仲裁庭都負(fù)有舉證責(zé)任證明對本案具有管轄權(quán)。為使仲裁庭更積極地探尋和調(diào)查有關(guān)管轄權(quán)異議的事實和理由,中國有必要通過適當(dāng)途徑就管轄權(quán)所涉事實和法律問題向仲裁庭提供利我且全面的信息。針對菲方最近提出的訴狀,中方應(yīng)采取更多樣化的程序外方式加強(qiáng)與仲裁庭的溝通。
[Abstract]:Whether or not the Chinese side challenges jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the tribunal to prove jurisdiction over the case. In order to make the arbitral tribunal more active in seeking and investigating the facts and reasons of the jurisdiction objection, it is necessary for China to provide the arbitral tribunal with beneficial and comprehensive information on the factual and legal issues involved in the jurisdiction through appropriate channels. In response to the recent filing by the Philippines, China should adopt a more diversified extra-procedural approach to strengthen communication with the arbitral tribunal.
【作者單位】: 武漢大學(xué)中國邊界與海洋研究院;
【基金】:中央財政支持中西部高校提升綜合實力科研創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊建設(shè)專項規(guī)劃項目“我國南海海洋權(quán)益維護(hù)研究”階段性成果
【分類號】:D993.5;D994
,
本文編號:2243611
[Abstract]:Whether or not the Chinese side challenges jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the tribunal to prove jurisdiction over the case. In order to make the arbitral tribunal more active in seeking and investigating the facts and reasons of the jurisdiction objection, it is necessary for China to provide the arbitral tribunal with beneficial and comprehensive information on the factual and legal issues involved in the jurisdiction through appropriate channels. In response to the recent filing by the Philippines, China should adopt a more diversified extra-procedural approach to strengthen communication with the arbitral tribunal.
【作者單位】: 武漢大學(xué)中國邊界與海洋研究院;
【基金】:中央財政支持中西部高校提升綜合實力科研創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊建設(shè)專項規(guī)劃項目“我國南海海洋權(quán)益維護(hù)研究”階段性成果
【分類號】:D993.5;D994
,
本文編號:2243611
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2243611.html
最近更新
教材專著