【摘要】：隨著海峽兩岸愈來愈密切的聯(lián)系與往來,無可避免的就是因此產(chǎn)生許多民商事糾紛。從兩岸人民福祉之考慮,維護(hù)其合法權(quán)益,處理衍生之法律案件,大陸地區(qū)和臺(tái)灣地區(qū)陸續(xù)頒布相關(guān)法律文件,并以此為依據(jù)相繼有認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行對岸民事裁決之案例。但由于兩岸在法律制度、司法程序等方面存在明顯差異,加之政治因素所涉較多,在相互認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行民事裁判方面較為復(fù)雜與繁瑣,且隨著認(rèn)可對岸民事裁決之實(shí)務(wù)案例增多,矛盾與問題亦隨之凸顯。相互認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行對岸民事裁決中的要件問題尤其是公序良俗的適用問題、認(rèn)可之客體是否包括民事調(diào)解書、支付令、公證書等文書、認(rèn)可之民事裁決究竟具備何種效力問題、以及認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行對岸仲裁裁決所涉及之相關(guān)法律問題等,均引起兩岸理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界之關(guān)注與討論,這也是本文研究之重點(diǎn),將從多方面多角度對此進(jìn)行考察和分析,期冀獲致合理的結(jié)論以及妥適的解決問題意見和方法,以促進(jìn)兩岸間的交流與合作。本文共分六章,全文約四萬字。 第一章為問題的提出,首先闡述兩岸認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行對岸民事裁決之法律依據(jù)并加以分析,引用相關(guān)案例以說明認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行之實(shí)況,以及就此衍生之相關(guān)問題。 第二章兩岸民事裁判相互認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行的要件問題進(jìn)行剖析,首先對兩岸認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行之要件進(jìn)行比較研究,而后就其中最為爭議之部分即公序良俗原則的適用問題,以實(shí)務(wù)做法、學(xué)者觀點(diǎn)為切入點(diǎn)加以研究與討論。 第三章就爭議最大的兩岸民事裁判相互認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行之效力問題進(jìn)行剖析,從浙紡V.長榮.海運(yùn)案入手,對臺(tái)灣最高法院96年度臺(tái)上字第2531號(hào)判決的判決意旨以及臺(tái)灣理論界、實(shí)務(wù)界之觀點(diǎn)與做法進(jìn)行深入的思考與分析,提出經(jīng)裁定認(rèn)可之大陸民事裁判應(yīng)當(dāng)有與臺(tái)灣判決同一效力的論點(diǎn),并從多方面進(jìn)行論證和確認(rèn)。 第四章重點(diǎn)討論對法院調(diào)解書和支付令的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行問題,同時(shí)對公證文書、民間機(jī)構(gòu)所作之調(diào)解書是否屬于認(rèn)可之對象亦進(jìn)行分析。 第五章則就仲裁裁決的特殊性,對其在認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行中所產(chǎn)生的問題進(jìn)行反思與修正,主要是臨時(shí)仲裁問題、忽略差異性的簡單套用問題以及仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)之調(diào)解書問題。 第六章闡述了本文之結(jié)論與建議,即消除兩岸民事裁判認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行障礙的機(jī)制,從完善兩岸之單邊立法、簽訂兩岸之雙邊協(xié)議兩個(gè)角度構(gòu)建與完善兩岸相互認(rèn)可與執(zhí)行之制度。
[Abstract]:As the two sides of the strait become more and more close, it is inevitable that many civil and commercial disputes will arise. Considering the welfare of the people on both sides of the strait, safeguarding their legitimate rights and interests, handling derivative legal cases, the mainland and Taiwan have promulgated relevant legal documents one after another, and on the basis of this, there have been cases of recognizing and executing civil rulings on the other side. However, due to the obvious differences between the two sides in terms of legal system, judicial procedures, and political factors, the mutual recognition and enforcement of civil judgments are more complicated and cumbersome, and with the increasing number of practical cases of approving civil rulings across the Taiwan Strait, Contradictions and problems are also highlighted. The important elements in mutual recognition and enforcement of civil awards, especially the application of public order and good customs, whether the object of approval includes civil mediation documents, payment orders, notary certificates, and what kind of effect does the approved civil award have, And the related legal issues involved in the recognition and enforcement of the cross-bank arbitration award have aroused the attention and discussion of the theoretical and practical circles on both sides of the strait. This is also the focus of this study, which will be examined and analyzed from many aspects and angles. We hope to obtain reasonable conclusions and appropriate solutions to promote cross-strait exchanges and cooperation. This article is divided into six chapters, the full text about 40,000 words. The first chapter is the question of the legal basis and analysis of cross-Strait recognition and enforcement of civil awards, citing relevant cases to illustrate the reality of recognition and enforcement, as well as the related issues arising therefrom. The second chapter analyzes the requirements of mutual recognition and execution of civil adjudicators on both sides of the strait. Firstly, it makes a comparative study on the requirements of mutual recognition and enforcement, and then applies the most controversial part, the principle of public order and good custom, to practice. Scholars point of view to study and discuss. The third chapter analyzes the validity of mutual recognition and enforcement of civil referees on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, from the point of view of Zhejiang Textile. Evergreen. Starting with the maritime transport case, this paper makes a deep thinking and analysis of the meaning of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Taiwan's judgment No. 2531 of 1996, as well as the viewpoints and practices of Taiwan's theoretical and practical circles. This paper puts forward the argument that the mainland civil adjudication should have the same effect as the Taiwan judgment, and proves and confirms it from many aspects. The fourth chapter focuses on the recognition and enforcement of the court mediation and payment orders, and also analyzes whether the notarization documents and the mediation statements made by civil institutions belong to the approved object. The fifth chapter is about the particularity of the arbitration award, which reflects and corrects the problems arising from the recognition and enforcement of arbitration award, mainly the temporary arbitration problem, the simple application of ignoring the difference and the mediation document of the arbitration institution. The sixth chapter expounds the conclusions and suggestions of this paper, that is, the mechanism of removing the obstacles to the recognition and execution of civil adjudication on both sides of the strait, and from the perspectives of perfecting the unilateral legislation of the two sides of the strait and signing the bilateral agreements between the two sides, the system of mutual recognition and enforcement between the two sides of the strait is constructed and perfected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D997
，

本文編號(hào)：2235555