對中國相關(guān)原材料出口限制措施案的分析
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-16 12:34
【摘要】:“中國相關(guān)原材料出口限制措施案(DS395)”是涉及中國WTO爭端解決的一個最受關(guān)注的新近案例。本案涉及了司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則、透明度要求程度、《中華人民共和國加入WTO議定書》和《中國加入工作組報告書》的法律地位和法律適用等法律問題,援引GATT第20條例外條款作為抗辯理由的合法性、合理性。這些法律問題相當(dāng)?shù)湫?在今后的案例中,上述問題肯定還將遇到。本文重點(diǎn)關(guān)注《中華人民共和國加入WTO議定書》與GATT第20條例外援引問題。從概述基本案情和專家組報告的角度出發(fā),在專家組主要裁定結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上,本文對中國能否在WTO規(guī)則及《中華人民共和國加入WTO議定書》下援引GATT第20條例外條款進(jìn)行抗辯,以及GATT第20條的法律適用性進(jìn)行討論和分析。本文認(rèn)為,GATT第20條已經(jīng)成為今后涉及中國案件的“矛”與“盾”。因此,我們有必要系統(tǒng)研究GATT第20條以及WTO爭端解決實(shí)踐中對相關(guān)案例的解釋,為我國的提供一項有力的法律武器。
[Abstract]:The China-related Raw material Export restrictions (DS395) case is one of the most recent cases involving China's WTO dispute settlement. The case deals with legal issues such as the principle of judicial economy, the degree of transparency requirements, the legal status and legal application of the Protocol on the accession of the people's Republic of China to the WTO and the report of the working Group on China's accession to the WTO. The lawfulness and reasonableness of invoking the non-clause of GATT Regulation 20 as the defense. These legal problems are quite typical and will certainly be encountered in future cases. This paper focuses on the issue of the people's Republic of China's accession to the WTO Protocol and the 20 th Regulation of GATT. From the point of view of summarizing the basic facts of the case and the report of the Panel of experts, and on the basis of the main conclusions of the Panel of experts, this paper defends whether China can invoke the provisions of the 20th Regulation of GATT under the WTO rules and the Protocol of the people's Republic of China's accession to WTO. And the legal applicability of Article 20 of GATT is discussed and analyzed. This paper holds that Article 20 of GATT has become the "spear" and "shield" concerning Chinese cases in the future. Therefore, it is necessary for us to systematically study Article 20 of GATT and the interpretation of relevant cases in the practice of WTO dispute settlement, so as to provide a powerful legal weapon for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D996.1
,
本文編號:2185999
[Abstract]:The China-related Raw material Export restrictions (DS395) case is one of the most recent cases involving China's WTO dispute settlement. The case deals with legal issues such as the principle of judicial economy, the degree of transparency requirements, the legal status and legal application of the Protocol on the accession of the people's Republic of China to the WTO and the report of the working Group on China's accession to the WTO. The lawfulness and reasonableness of invoking the non-clause of GATT Regulation 20 as the defense. These legal problems are quite typical and will certainly be encountered in future cases. This paper focuses on the issue of the people's Republic of China's accession to the WTO Protocol and the 20 th Regulation of GATT. From the point of view of summarizing the basic facts of the case and the report of the Panel of experts, and on the basis of the main conclusions of the Panel of experts, this paper defends whether China can invoke the provisions of the 20th Regulation of GATT under the WTO rules and the Protocol of the people's Republic of China's accession to WTO. And the legal applicability of Article 20 of GATT is discussed and analyzed. This paper holds that Article 20 of GATT has become the "spear" and "shield" concerning Chinese cases in the future. Therefore, it is necessary for us to systematically study Article 20 of GATT and the interpretation of relevant cases in the practice of WTO dispute settlement, so as to provide a powerful legal weapon for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D996.1
,
本文編號:2185999
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2185999.html
最近更新
教材專著