【摘要】：在反補貼調(diào)查程序中,只有確定受補貼的進口產(chǎn)品對國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)造成損害,且受補貼進口產(chǎn)品與國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的損害存在因果關(guān)系時,調(diào)查當局才能采取反補貼措施。否則,無論補貼幅度如何變化,都不能對受補貼進口產(chǎn)征收反補貼稅。損害認定不僅是反補貼調(diào)查程序中的一個重要的環(huán)節(jié),而且是避免反補貼調(diào)查程序濫用以及保護國際貿(mào)易公平的有效方式。 歐盟反補貼調(diào)查中有關(guān)損害的規(guī)定與《SCM協(xié)定》無論是在立法精神方面還是在具體的規(guī)定方面都保持了基本的一致性,再加上歐盟豐富的實踐經(jīng)驗,較其他國家或區(qū)域而言,在反補貼調(diào)查中有關(guān)損害認定方面的立法和實踐是相對完善的,其立法和實踐對于我國是有參考借鑒意義的。另外,鑒于近年來歐盟對亞洲國家,尤其是針對發(fā)展中國家的提起的反補貼調(diào)查越來越多,并于2010年向我國提起了兩起反補貼調(diào)查。為保護我國的合法利益及維護國際貿(mào)易公平,對歐盟反補貼調(diào)查的核心問題,即損害問題進行研究也是有現(xiàn)實意義的。 本文以《歐盟的反補貼基本條例》為基礎(chǔ),運用法條分析,案例分析,量化分析以及比較分析的方法對歐盟反補貼措施中的損害認定予以論述。最后,提出一些關(guān)于完善我國反補貼調(diào)查中損害認定的建議。具體而言,本文分為五章。第一章是對歐盟反補貼調(diào)查中損害問題的概述,具體包括WTO與歐盟對損害的具體規(guī)定,歐盟對同類產(chǎn)品和共同體產(chǎn)業(yè)的認定。這三項要素是理解分析反補貼調(diào)查程序中“損害”的基本問題。第二章,第三章與第四章分別論述了歐盟反補貼調(diào)查中損害形態(tài),因果關(guān)系,損害幅度,累計評估以及對共同體利益的分析。第六章首先闡述了我國反補貼調(diào)查中損害認定規(guī)則的立現(xiàn)狀以及存在的不足,最后結(jié)合前四章的結(jié)論,對我國損害認定的規(guī)則提出一些完善的建議。
[Abstract]:In the procedure of countervailing investigation, the investigation authorities can take countervailing measures only when it is determined that the subsidized imported products cause harm to the domestic industry and that there is a causal relationship between the subsidized imported products and the domestic industry. Otherwise, no matter how subsidies vary, subsidized imports cannot be subject to countervailing duties. Damage determination is not only an important link in countervailing investigation procedure, but also an effective way to avoid the abuse of countervailing investigation procedure and to protect the fairness of international trade. The damage provisions in the EU countervailing investigation are basically consistent with the SCM Agreement in terms of both the legislative spirit and the specific provisions. In addition, the EU has a wealth of practical experience, compared with other countries or regions. The legislation and practice of damage determination in countervailing investigation is relatively perfect, and its legislation and practice have reference significance for our country. In addition, in view of the increasing number of EU countervailing investigations against Asian countries, especially developing countries, two countervailing investigations were initiated to China in 2010. In order to protect China's legitimate interests and safeguard international trade fairness, it is also of practical significance to study the core issue of EU countervailing investigation, that is, damage. Based on the basic regulations on countervailing measures of the European Union, this paper discusses the damage determination of EU countervailing measures by the methods of law analysis, case analysis, quantitative analysis and comparative analysis. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the damage identification in countervailing investigation in China. Specifically, this paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the damage problems in the EU countervailing investigation, including the specific provisions of WTO and the EU on the damage, the EU's recognition of similar products and community industries. These three elements are the basic problem of understanding and analyzing the "damage" in countervailing investigation procedure. The second chapter, the third chapter and the fourth chapter respectively discuss the damage form, causality, damage extent, accumulative evaluation and the analysis of the community interest in the EU countervailing investigation. The sixth chapter first expounds the current situation and the shortcomings of the damage recognition rules in the countervailing investigation in China. Finally, combined with the conclusions of the previous four chapters, the author puts forward some perfect suggestions on the rules of damage recognition in our country.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李蕾;彭浩;;歐盟反傾銷法——共同體利益條款[J];法制與社會;2008年19期

2 周天歡;反補貼法對我國的適用[J];國際貿(mào)易;1994年11期

3 郭桂環(huán);;反傾銷反補貼調(diào)查中的損害要件及對我國的啟示[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學學報(綜合版);2008年04期

4 孫南申;彭岳;;中國反補貼規(guī)則與SCM規(guī)則的差異分析與沖突解決[J];華東政法學院學報;2007年02期

5 歐福永;劉琳;高萍;;論我國反補貼立法的完善[J];湖南經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2006年03期

6 歐福永,楊陶;美國反補貼法中“因果關(guān)系”的確定及其對我國的啟示[J];時代法學;2005年04期

7 歐福永;高萍;;WTO《補貼與反補貼措施協(xié)定》附件一(K)款一項的解釋與適用——以巴西飛機補貼案為依據(jù)[J];時代法學;2010年04期

8 高雅瑞;;發(fā)達國家反補貼規(guī)則的比較研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年07期

9 楊丹;略談"共同體利益"在歐共體反傾銷法中的應用[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年02期

10 黃文旭;;歐盟反補貼調(diào)查的趨勢及我國的應對策略[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2010年06期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 尹德永;WTO補貼反補貼實體規(guī)則研究[D];中國政法大學;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前7條

1 蔡蓓;反傾銷法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2004年

2 楊秀麗;歐盟反傾銷法及應對策略研究[D];黑龍江大學;2005年

3 李曉;反傾銷實體法比較研究[D];大連海事大學;2003年

4 逯曼;中國應對國外反補貼產(chǎn)業(yè)損害研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2007年

5 孫曉娟;論WTO補貼與反補貼規(guī)定及中國立法之完善[D];大連海事大學;2009年

6 寧家;反補貼調(diào)查中損害認定的若干法律問題研究[D];湖南師范大學;2009年

7 厲峰;反傾銷法中損害確定若干問題[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2176451