國際商事仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-25 16:49
【摘要】：在國際民事訴訟中打官司就是打證據(jù)，這句話在國際商事仲裁中也同樣適用。證據(jù)規(guī)則是國際商事仲裁中的重要理論問題之一，是裁判者認定案件事實做出公正公平裁決的重要手段，也關系到仲裁裁決是否符合公平與效率等現(xiàn)代商事仲裁對證據(jù)規(guī)則的基本要求。 本文以介紹兩大法系中對證據(jù)規(guī)則的內(nèi)涵界定開頭，提出了本文對于證據(jù)規(guī)則的內(nèi)涵的看法。接著重點論述了證據(jù)規(guī)則的概論方面，包括基本原則和價值取向。證據(jù)規(guī)則也涉及到法律適用的問題，，在理論探討后，運用了舉例例證的方式，理論與實踐相結(jié)合，論述了法律適用的理論與實踐問題，得出了目前國際商事仲裁在證據(jù)規(guī)則適用上的總體發(fā)展趨勢。其次分析了我國的仲裁立法現(xiàn)狀和實踐，得出了我國仲裁立法有關規(guī)定不符合國際商事仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則的發(fā)展趨勢。并與我國民事訴訟中證據(jù)規(guī)則做比較，發(fā)現(xiàn)了我國涉外仲裁中運用的證據(jù)規(guī)則大多與國內(nèi)訴訟相同，最后提出了我國涉外仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則應該建立起特有的證據(jù)規(guī)則體系，在涉外商事仲裁中建構(gòu)起公平、效率符合仲裁效益最大化的證明過程。 本文共分為四章，第一章采用了比較研究和文獻分析等方法分析了國際商事仲裁的證據(jù)規(guī)則主要包括了證據(jù)能力、證明力和證明程序規(guī)則。基本原則中主要論述了意思自治和“誰主張誰舉證”原則，并認為國際商事仲裁的價值取向是效率優(yōu)先、兼顧公平，追求仲裁效益最大化。 第二章主要論述了國際商事仲裁中的法律適用問題，先分析了法律適用的理論，認為優(yōu)先適用當事人選擇的證據(jù)規(guī)則，若當事人沒有選擇，則適用仲裁地法，而“非當?shù)鼗碚摗辈⑽吹玫狡毡榻邮堋Ｈ缓蟛捎脤嵶C分析法論述了我國、瑞典和美國的具體法律適用的實踐，最后得出了國際商事仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則法律適用的發(fā)展趨勢。 第三章按照證據(jù)規(guī)則中的取證、質(zhì)證和認證的順序，具體闡述了取證中的域外取證和證據(jù)保全兩個方面，質(zhì)證中的交叉盤問規(guī)則和認證中幾個具有代表性的證據(jù)規(guī)則以及仲裁員“自由心證”問題。 第四章首先分析了我國仲裁法中有關取證、質(zhì)證和認證的相關規(guī)定的現(xiàn)狀與不足，隨后提出我國涉外仲裁域外取證的制度的構(gòu)建、證據(jù)保全的完善、質(zhì)證規(guī)則的簡化、認證中對“自由心證”實行“心證公開”等建議，以期拋磚引玉。
[Abstract]:A lawsuit in an international civil action is evidence, and the same applies in international commercial arbitration. The rule of evidence is one of the important theoretical issues in international commercial arbitration. It also relates to whether the arbitral award meets the basic requirements of modern commercial arbitration such as fairness and efficiency. This paper begins with an introduction to the definition of evidence rules in the two legal systems, and puts forward the views of this paper on the connotation of evidence rules. Then, the paper focuses on the introduction of evidence rules, including the basic principles and value orientation. The rule of evidence is also concerned with the application of law. After the theoretical discussion, the author discusses the theory and practice of the application of law by using examples and combining theory with practice. The general development trend of the application of evidence rules in international commercial arbitration is obtained. Secondly, it analyzes the current situation and practice of arbitration legislation in China, and concludes that the relevant provisions of arbitration legislation in China are not in accordance with the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. Comparing with the evidence rules in civil litigation in our country, it is found that most of the evidence rules used in foreign arbitration in our country are the same as those in domestic litigation. Finally, it is put forward that the evidence rules of foreign arbitration in our country should set up a special system of evidence rules. In foreign-related commercial arbitration, the construction of fairness, efficiency in line with the maximum efficiency of arbitration proof process. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration by means of comparative study and literature analysis, including the evidence capacity, the power of proof and the rules of proof procedure. In the basic principle, it mainly discusses the autonomy of will and the principle of "who advocates the proof", and points out that the value orientation of international commercial arbitration is efficiency first, fair consideration, and the pursuit of maximization of arbitration benefit. The second chapter mainly discusses the application of the law in international commercial arbitration, analyzes the theory of the application of the law, and thinks that the rules of evidence selected by the parties should be applied first, and if the parties do not choose, the law of the place of arbitration will be applied. However, the theory of non-localization has not been generally accepted. Then it discusses the practice of the application of the law in our country, Sweden and the United States by using the empirical analysis method, and finally draws the development trend of the application of the law to the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. In the third chapter, according to the order of evidence collection, cross-examination and authentication in the rules of evidence, two aspects of evidence taking and evidence preservation are elaborated in detail. Cross-examination rules in cross-examination, several representative evidence rules in certification and arbitrators'"free evidence". The fourth chapter first analyzes the current situation and deficiency of the relevant provisions on evidence, cross-examination and certification in the arbitration law of our country, then puts forward the construction of the system of extra-territorial evidence collection, the perfection of evidence preservation and the simplification of the rules of cross-examination in China's foreign arbitration. In the certification of "free heart card" to implement "heart card open" and other suggestions, with a view to drawing the brick.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
本文編號：2144440
[Abstract]:A lawsuit in an international civil action is evidence, and the same applies in international commercial arbitration. The rule of evidence is one of the important theoretical issues in international commercial arbitration. It also relates to whether the arbitral award meets the basic requirements of modern commercial arbitration such as fairness and efficiency. This paper begins with an introduction to the definition of evidence rules in the two legal systems, and puts forward the views of this paper on the connotation of evidence rules. Then, the paper focuses on the introduction of evidence rules, including the basic principles and value orientation. The rule of evidence is also concerned with the application of law. After the theoretical discussion, the author discusses the theory and practice of the application of law by using examples and combining theory with practice. The general development trend of the application of evidence rules in international commercial arbitration is obtained. Secondly, it analyzes the current situation and practice of arbitration legislation in China, and concludes that the relevant provisions of arbitration legislation in China are not in accordance with the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. Comparing with the evidence rules in civil litigation in our country, it is found that most of the evidence rules used in foreign arbitration in our country are the same as those in domestic litigation. Finally, it is put forward that the evidence rules of foreign arbitration in our country should set up a special system of evidence rules. In foreign-related commercial arbitration, the construction of fairness, efficiency in line with the maximum efficiency of arbitration proof process. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration by means of comparative study and literature analysis, including the evidence capacity, the power of proof and the rules of proof procedure. In the basic principle, it mainly discusses the autonomy of will and the principle of "who advocates the proof", and points out that the value orientation of international commercial arbitration is efficiency first, fair consideration, and the pursuit of maximization of arbitration benefit. The second chapter mainly discusses the application of the law in international commercial arbitration, analyzes the theory of the application of the law, and thinks that the rules of evidence selected by the parties should be applied first, and if the parties do not choose, the law of the place of arbitration will be applied. However, the theory of non-localization has not been generally accepted. Then it discusses the practice of the application of the law in our country, Sweden and the United States by using the empirical analysis method, and finally draws the development trend of the application of the law to the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. In the third chapter, according to the order of evidence collection, cross-examination and authentication in the rules of evidence, two aspects of evidence taking and evidence preservation are elaborated in detail. Cross-examination rules in cross-examination, several representative evidence rules in certification and arbitrators'"free evidence". The fourth chapter first analyzes the current situation and deficiency of the relevant provisions on evidence, cross-examination and certification in the arbitration law of our country, then puts forward the construction of the system of extra-territorial evidence collection, the perfection of evidence preservation and the simplification of the rules of cross-examination in China's foreign arbitration. In the certification of "free heart card" to implement "heart card open" and other suggestions, with a view to drawing the brick.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 楊娟;;試評近年來中國有關仲裁的主要司法解釋[J];北京仲裁;2007年01期
2 費宗yN;;費宗yN先生談仲裁法的修改[J];北京仲裁;2007年02期
3 梁慧星;;論仲裁法修改的方向——梁慧星先生在第二屆中國仲裁論壇上的講話[J];北京仲裁;2007年02期
4 李明;;最佳證據(jù)規(guī)則探索[J];研究生法學;2009年01期
5 尹偉民;;域外證據(jù)的特別證明程序探析——兼論《最高人民法院關于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》第11條[J];大連海事大學學報(社會科學版);2007年01期
6 卞建林,姚莉;關于建立和完善我國證據(jù)規(guī)則的思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1999年05期
7 劉曉紅;;確定仲裁員責任制度的法理思考——兼評述中國仲裁員責任制度[J];華東政法大學學報;2007年05期
8 王長江;論我國裁判文書理由模式的選擇[J];河南社會科學;2003年03期
9 宋朝武;;仲裁證據(jù)的非訴化及其路徑選擇[J];河南社會科學;2010年03期
10 郭道暉;立法的效益與效率[J];法學研究;1996年02期
本文編號：2144440
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2144440.html
