本文選題：文化財產(chǎn)的返還 + UNESCO��； 參考：《國際商務(wù)研究》2012年01期

【摘要】：文化財產(chǎn)的跨國流轉(zhuǎn)與返還具有一定的聯(lián)系,主要涉及戰(zhàn)時被掠奪文化財產(chǎn)、盜竊文化財產(chǎn)以及非法貿(mào)易下文化財產(chǎn)的返還問題。在現(xiàn)有的法律語境下,這不僅是國內(nèi)法問題,亦產(chǎn)生國際法問題。相應(yīng)的法律問題主要包括:國家作為所有人時的返還問題、文化財產(chǎn)返還的實質(zhì)性限制問題、善意第三人保護(hù)的問題、訴訟時效問題等。由于國內(nèi)法并不能為文化財產(chǎn)的返還提供可預(yù)期的框架,因此有必要通過國際法體系來處理文化財產(chǎn)的返還問題。對此,本文將重點評價聯(lián)合國教科文組織關(guān)于文化財產(chǎn)保護(hù)的UNESCO1970公約和國際統(tǒng)一私法協(xié)會關(guān)于文物返還的UNIDROIT1995公約的作用與缺陷,并對文化財產(chǎn)返還的法律途徑予以進(jìn)一步探討。
[Abstract]:The transnational circulation of cultural property is related to the return of cultural property, which is mainly related to the cultural property looted in wartime, the theft of cultural property and the return of cultural property under illegal trade. In the current legal context, this is not only a matter of domestic law, but also a problem of international law. The corresponding legal problems mainly include: the return of the state as the owner, the substantive limitation of the return of cultural property, the protection of the third party in good faith, the limitation of action and so on. Since domestic law did not provide a predictable framework for the return of cultural property, it was necessary to address the issue of the return of cultural property through the system of international law. This paper will focus on the evaluation of UNESCO1970 Convention on the Protection of Cultural property of UNESCO and the Unidroit 1995 Convention on the return of Cultural property of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Unidroit 1995), and further explore the legal channels for the return of cultural property.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目《文化財產(chǎn)的跨國流轉(zhuǎn)與返還法律問題研究》(項目編號:09BFX087)
【分類號】：D997;D922.16

【二級參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 甘功仁,白彥,丁亮華;取得時效制度的適用性研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年04期

，

本文編號：2112554