本文選題：外國(guó)直接投資 + 跨國(guó)并購(gòu)��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：跨國(guó)并購(gòu)的深入加劇了國(guó)際間的經(jīng)濟(jì)往來，東道國(guó)比以往更加關(guān)切由此帶來的國(guó)家安全問題。因而，各國(guó)紛紛制定各自的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度。由于各國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平不同，不同法律之間有交融，有差異�；谶@種情勢(shì)的判斷，我國(guó)正在積極打造具有中國(guó)特色的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度。直到二0一一年二月，國(guó)務(wù)院辦公廳發(fā)布了《國(guó)務(wù)院辦公廳關(guān)于建立外國(guó)投資者并購(gòu)境內(nèi)企業(yè)安全審查制度的通知》，要求建立中國(guó)的跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度。隨后在2011年8月25日，國(guó)務(wù)院頒布了《商務(wù)部實(shí)施外國(guó)投資者并購(gòu)境內(nèi)企業(yè)安全審查制度的規(guī)定》，該規(guī)定自2011年9月1日開始實(shí)施。上述頻繁的立法活動(dòng)表明我國(guó)正在著手制定跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的法律細(xì)則，也代表中國(guó)對(duì)于跨國(guó)并購(gòu)的安全性提出了更為嚴(yán)苛的要求。 本文的研究順應(yīng)了國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)作的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。對(duì)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)境內(nèi)企業(yè)進(jìn)行國(guó)家安全審查是國(guó)際通行的做法，它不是貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的體現(xiàn)。我國(guó)此次立法也是運(yùn)用WTO規(guī)則保護(hù)國(guó)家利益的重要成果，該立法的重要性在于既依法行政，將國(guó)家安全審查制度納入國(guó)內(nèi)的行政管理，又?jǐn)U大開放，符合中國(guó)一直以來對(duì)外開放的外資投資政策。 本文分為三章，每一章都對(duì)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行了闡述,通過中美跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的一系列比較,查找中國(guó)在該制度中的各種不足，，然后提出合理完善的建議。 第一章對(duì)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了說明。第一節(jié)肅清了跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的涵義、特點(diǎn)和內(nèi)容；第二節(jié)分析了建立跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的必要性和優(yōu)越性；第三節(jié)總結(jié)了研究中美跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度比較的意義。 第二章分析了美國(guó)國(guó)家安全審查制度立法架構(gòu)和程序設(shè)計(jì)的現(xiàn)狀，概括總結(jié)了美國(guó)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的優(yōu)勢(shì)和作用。 第三章分析了中國(guó)國(guó)家安全審查制度立法架構(gòu)和程序設(shè)計(jì)的現(xiàn)狀，通過和美國(guó)的比較，找出我國(guó)在立法架構(gòu)和程序設(shè)計(jì)的不足。最后本文希望可以借鑒美國(guó)國(guó)家安全審查制度的精華，從多個(gè)角度完善我國(guó)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)中的國(guó)家安全審查制度。
[Abstract]:The deepening of cross-border M & A intensifies international economic exchanges, and the host country is more concerned about the national security problems than ever before. As a result, each country formulates its own national security review system of M & A one after another. Because each country's economic development level is different, the different law has the blend, has the difference. Based on the judgment of this situation, China is actively establishing a national security review system with Chinese characteristics. Until February 2011, the General Office of the State Council issued the Circular of the General Office of the State Council on establishing a security review system for foreign investors in mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, calling for the establishment of a national security review system for cross-border mergers and acquisitions in China. Subsequently, on August 25, 2011, the State Council promulgated the regulations of the Ministry of Commerce on the implementation of the security review system for foreign investors in mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, which has been implemented since September 1, 2011. The frequent legislative activities mentioned above indicate that China is working out the legal rules of the national security review system for cross-border M & as, and it also represents that China has put forward more stringent requirements for the security of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The research in this paper conforms to the development trend of international economic operation. It is an international practice to review the national security of transnational M & A domestic enterprises, and it is not the embodiment of trade protectionism. This legislation is also an important achievement of protecting the national interests by using WTO rules. The importance of the legislation lies in the administration of law, the incorporation of the national security review system into the domestic administration, and the expansion of the opening up. In line with China's opening up to the outside world since the policy of foreign investment. This article is divided into three chapters, each chapter of the national security review system of cross-border mergers and acquisitions related issues are elaborated, through a series of comparisons between China and the United States in the national security review system of cross-border mergers and acquisitions, to find out the shortcomings of China in the system, Then put forward reasonable and perfect suggestions. The first chapter explains the related concepts of national security review system of transnational M & A (M & A). The first section clears the meaning, the characteristic and the content of the national security review system of transnational merger and acquisition, the second section analyzes the necessity and superiority of establishing the national security review system of transnational merger and acquisition. The third section summarizes the significance of comparing the national security review system of cross-border M & A between China and the United States. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of the legislative framework and program design of the national security review system in the United States, and summarizes the advantages and functions of the national security review system of transnational mergers and acquisitions in the United States. The third chapter analyzes the current situation of the legislative framework and program design of China's national security review system, and finds out the shortcomings of the legislative framework and program design of our country through the comparison with the United States. Finally, this paper hopes to use the essence of American national security review system for reference, and perfect the national security review system in Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions from many angles.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉躍進(jìn);解析國(guó)家文化安全的基本內(nèi)容[J];北方論叢;2004年05期

2 林平;李嫣怡;;外資并購(gòu)的國(guó)家安全審查:概念、國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)和政策建議[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2009年01期

3 湯欣;;“經(jīng)濟(jì)安全”與外資并購(gòu)審查[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年01期

4 楊軍敏;徐波;;外資并購(gòu)的國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全規(guī)制研究[J];東華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

5 田小穹;;論我國(guó)外國(guó)投資者并購(gòu)境內(nèi)企業(yè)行政審查程序制度的完善[J];法律適用;2010年05期

6 王小瓊;何焰;;美國(guó)外資并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查立法的新發(fā)展及其啟示——兼論《中華人民共和國(guó)反壟斷法》第31條的實(shí)施[J];法商研究;2008年06期

7 王曉曄;;《中華人民共和國(guó)反壟斷法》中經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中的評(píng)析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

8 邵沙平;王小承;;美國(guó)外資并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度探析——兼論中國(guó)外資并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查制度的構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)家;2008年03期

9 柴媛媛;;外資并購(gòu)的國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全分析——以法律規(guī)制為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年34期

10 黃玲;;淺談如何構(gòu)建我國(guó)外資并購(gòu)安全審查制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馮立娟;中美外資并購(gòu)國(guó)家安全審查機(jī)制比較研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2011年

2 王少U

本文編號(hào)：2105701