本文選題：托運(yùn)人 + 訴權(quán)　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文著眼于海上貨物運(yùn)輸中,托運(yùn)人的訴權(quán)問(wèn)題,主要通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外以及國(guó)際公約對(duì)托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)的立法及學(xué)術(shù)界相關(guān)理論的分析,從理性和實(shí)用的角度闡明托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的根源及解決思路,在科學(xué)理論的支持下,提出可行的實(shí)踐操作方案和未來(lái)《海商法》關(guān)于托運(yùn)人方面修改的參考性建議。 文章主要采用比較研究的方法,從實(shí)踐出發(fā)展開(kāi)理論分析,注重應(yīng)然和實(shí)然的轉(zhuǎn)化以及航運(yùn)實(shí)踐中價(jià)值的取舍,全面分析和解決托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)問(wèn)題。 文章分為正文和結(jié)論兩大部分,一共三章,具體如下： 第一章介紹了托運(yùn)人和托運(yùn)人訴權(quán),以及《海商法》定義的托運(yùn)人在實(shí)踐中帶來(lái)的系列問(wèn)題,進(jìn)而引出各界對(duì)托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)問(wèn)題的探討。 第二章比較研究了英國(guó)法、美國(guó)法以及《鹿特丹規(guī)則》起草過(guò)程中對(duì)托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)的規(guī)定,剖析我國(guó)法律規(guī)定的不完善,總結(jié)外國(guó)法及國(guó)際公約中值得借鑒的方面。 第三章詳細(xì)分析了現(xiàn)行法律制度下,我國(guó)司法界對(duì)托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)的不同態(tài)度以及理論界的不同看法,結(jié)合典型案例對(duì)司法判決及學(xué)者觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析,并全面討論了提單轉(zhuǎn)讓后及托運(yùn)人作為提單持有人時(shí)的合同訴權(quán)和侵權(quán)訴權(quán)。 結(jié)論部分通過(guò)上述探討,提出未來(lái)《海商法》修改時(shí)關(guān)于托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)問(wèn)題的規(guī)定的參考性建議。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the shippers' right of action in the carriage of goods by sea, mainly through the analysis of the legislation of the shipper's right of action and the relevant theories of the academia through the domestic and foreign and international conventions. This paper expounds the origin of the shipper's right of action and its solution from the angle of rationality and practicality. With the support of scientific theory, this paper puts forward the feasible practical operation scheme and the reference suggestions on the modification of shippers in Maritime Law in the future. This paper mainly adopts the method of comparative study, starting from practice to carry out theoretical analysis, pays attention to the transformation of ought and reality and the value choice in shipping practice, and analyzes and solves the problem of shipper's right of action in an all-round way. The article is divided into two parts: the text and conclusion, a total of three chapters, as follows: the first chapter introduces the shipper and shipper rights of action, as well as the definition of "maritime law" shippers in practice brought a series of problems, And then leads to the discussion of the shipper's right of action from all walks of life. The second chapter compares the provisions of the shipper's right of action in the drafting process of English law, American law and Rotterdam rules, analyzes the imperfections of our country's legal provisions, and summarizes the aspects of foreign law and international conventions that are worthy of reference. The third chapter analyzes in detail the different attitudes of the judicial circles to the shipper's right of action and the different views of the theoretical circle under the current legal system, and analyzes the judicial decision and the views of the scholars in the light of typical cases. The contractual right and tort right of bill of lading after the transfer of bill of lading and the shipper as the holder of bill of lading are discussed. Through the above discussion, the conclusion part puts forward some suggestions on the provisions of the shipper's right of action when the Maritime Law is amended in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 初北平;再論記名提單下的無(wú)單放貨[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2003年00期

2 司玉琢,汪杰,祝默泉,沈曉平;關(guān)于無(wú)單放貨的理論與實(shí)踐——兼論提單的物權(quán)性問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2000年00期

3 韓立新,闞琳琳;論提單所證明之海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同的性質(zhì)——兼論提單對(duì)第三人的效力[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;2003年00期

4 高運(yùn)勝;;采用FOB貿(mào)易術(shù)語(yǔ)出口的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其防范[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2006年02期

5 王艷玲,王應(yīng)富;海上貨物運(yùn)輸合同下托運(yùn)人訴權(quán)問(wèn)題探究[J];中國(guó)海商法年刊;1998年00期

6 郭瑜;論提單債權(quán)關(guān)系[J];中外法學(xué);1999年02期

7 屈廣清,王淑敏,杜萱;UNCITRAL《運(yùn)輸法草案》對(duì)提單持有人訴權(quán)的保護(hù)及其借鑒[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

8 陳芳;提單與票據(jù)法律性質(zhì)之比較研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2096261