本文選題：《能源憲章條約》 + 環(huán)境保護　； 參考：《前沿》2010年04期

【摘要】：與晚近其他投資協(xié)定相比,《能源憲章條約》存在諸多缺陷:缺少對締約國環(huán)境義務的規(guī)定、針對投資保護的環(huán)境例外缺失、未明確其與多邊環(huán)境協(xié)定的關系、環(huán)境條款軟化空洞以及爭端解決程序未給環(huán)境保護留出空間等。該條約中對環(huán)境表示一定關注的條款具有軟法性質(zhì),此雖為妥協(xié)于目前現(xiàn)實需要之結(jié)果,仍不失為向生態(tài)正義邁進的一個步驟。
[Abstract]:Compared with other recent investment agreements, the Energy Charter Treaty has many shortcomings: the lack of provisions on the environmental obligations of contracting parties, the absence of environmental exceptions to investment protection and the lack of clarity on their relationship to multilateral environmental agreements, The environmental clause softens the void and the dispute settlement procedure does not leave space for environmental protection. The provisions of the treaty which concern about the environment have the nature of soft law, which is a step forward to ecological justice, although it is the result of compromises to the current practical needs.
【作者單位】： 上海政法學院國際法商系;
【分類號】：D99

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 方金華;論WTO框架內(nèi)國際投資自由化的新發(fā)展[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟w，

本文編號：2063704