本文選題：專利平行進口 + 權利用盡原則�。� 參考：《華東政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：專利平行進口不僅僅是國際貿易問題,還是一個有關知識產權的問題。實踐中,不同國家和地區(qū)出于自身經(jīng)濟利益的考慮,往往對專利平行進口采取不同的態(tài)度。學術界專利平行進口的相關理論問題的爭議也從未停止過。本文試圖以傳統(tǒng)民法有關權利的基本理論以及知識產權的基本理論為切入點,并綜合運用比較法等法律研究方法對專利平行進口中的相關知識產權問題進行詳盡的闡述與分析,并對我國的現(xiàn)行專利平行進口制度提出一定的建議。文章分為四個部分: 第一部分,對專利平行進口的概念與特征進行詳盡的闡述,在此基礎上將專利平行進口與美國的灰色市場進行比較,得出二者的異同之處,在一定程度上將專利平行進口與美國的灰色市場相區(qū)分開來;最后從法律與經(jīng)濟兩方面著手,對專利平行進口的成因進行了分析。 第二部分,以傳統(tǒng)民法中有關權利的排他性的基本理論與知識產權法中的利益平衡原理為切入點,對專利排他權利設置的正當性進行了論述,并進一步闡明專利排他權利的權源;還結合設置專利排他權利的現(xiàn)實意義,對專利排他權利設置的重要性進行闡述。 第三部分,對各國的專利平行進口制度進行了比較分析,在此基礎上總結出各國關于專利平行進口制度的主要理論依據(jù)。這部分還重點對這些理論依據(jù)進行評價分析,得出筆者有關專利平行進口制度適用理論依據(jù)的觀點。 第四部分,對我國現(xiàn)行專利法有關專利平行進口制度的立法模式進行分析,并指出其缺陷,提出了相關的修改建議。
[Abstract]:Patent parallel import is not only a problem of international trade, but also an issue of intellectual property. In practice, different countries and regions tend to take different attitudes towards parallel imports of patents for their own economic interests. The academic circle patent parallel import related theory question the dispute also has never stopped. This article attempts to use the traditional civil law related rights basic theory and the intellectual property right basic theory as the breakthrough point, and synthetically uses the comparative law and so on legal research method to carry on the detailed elaboration and the analysis to the patent parallel import related intellectual property rights question. And put forward some suggestions to the current patent parallel import system of our country. The article is divided into four parts: in the first part, the concept and characteristics of patent parallel import are elaborated in detail, and on this basis, the parallel patent import is compared with the gray market in the United States, and the similarities and differences between the two are obtained. To a certain extent, the parallel import of patent is distinguished from the grey market in the United States. Finally, the causes of parallel import of patent are analyzed from the aspects of law and economy. The second part, based on the basic theory of exclusiveness of rights in traditional civil law and the principle of interest balance in intellectual property law, discusses the legitimacy of patent exclusive right setting. Furthermore, it clarifies the right source of patent exclusive right, and expounds the importance of patent exclusive right setting in combination with the practical significance of setting patent exclusive right. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the patent parallel import system in various countries, and summarizes the main theoretical basis of the patent parallel import system in various countries. This part also focuses on the evaluation and analysis of these theoretical basis, and draws the author's point of view on the application of the patent parallel import system. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the legislative model of patent parallel import system in China's patent law, points out its defects, and puts forward some suggestions to amend it.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 嚴桂珍;;權利窮盡原則在美國專利產品平行進口領域中的適用及其重大調整[J];比較法研究;2008年04期

2 梁銀湘;王伍萍;韓潔波;;金融危機背景下的知識產權平行進口探析[J];創(chuàng)新;2010年03期

3 王志剛;平行進口的競爭法律分析[J];當代法學;2002年03期

4 余翔 ,武蘭芬 ,姜軍;矛盾的選擇——日本專利權耗盡與產品平行進口立法及判例解析[J];電子知識產權;2004年10期

5 路直寬;;淺析知識產權的權利限制[J];法制與社會;2009年04期

6 劉春霖;安秀明;;知識產權使用許可權資本化的理論思考[J];河北經(jīng)貿大學學報;2009年03期

7 余翔;合同法對“商標權利耗盡”的影響[J];華中科技大學學報(社會科學版);2001年02期

8 侯宇,豐仕琪;論我國專利法對平行進口問題的立法選擇[J];江西農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2005年02期

9 嚴桂珍;;論進口權與平行進口的關系[J];同濟大學學報(社會科學版);2008年06期

10 儲敏;平行進口的法律性質分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2001年06期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 祝寧波;平行進口法律制度研究[D];華東政法學院;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 孫文麗;版權的權利窮竭原則研究[D];武漢理工大學;2005年

2 康添雄;美國專利間接侵權研究[D];西南政法大學;2006年

3 于志強;專利平行進口問題研究[D];湖南大學;2007年

4 張清霞;TRIPs協(xié)議下的專利平行進口問題[D];上海交通大學;2007年

5 閆宏;專利默示許可規(guī)則探析[D];清華大學;2007年

6 柏慧;專利平行進口法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2010年

，

本文編號：2042752