本文選題：責(zé)任競(jìng)合 + 涉外加害給付��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：加害給付是在近代才產(chǎn)生的概念，屬于違約責(zé)任和侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合的情形之一，也是人們?nèi)粘Ｉ钪斜容^容易碰到的。加害給付責(zé)任的實(shí)質(zhì)問(wèn)題是違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合與聚合的問(wèn)題，一方面，一方當(dāng)事人所交付的合同標(biāo)的物是存在瑕疵的，因而屬于違約行為；另一方面，由于瑕疵給付的標(biāo)的物還造成了另一方當(dāng)事人履行利益以外的損失，因而亦屬于侵權(quán)行為。侵權(quán)責(zé)任和違約責(zé)任的競(jìng)合并非古來(lái)就有，而是侵權(quán)法與合同法兩者在淵遠(yuǎn)的歷史中分立與磨合的產(chǎn)物。作為純粹國(guó)內(nèi)法問(wèn)題的加害給付所產(chǎn)生的責(zé)任問(wèn)題，無(wú)論是對(duì)其采取競(jìng)合態(tài)度還是聚合態(tài)度，又或是兩者兼顧，都將對(duì)國(guó)際私法產(chǎn)生影響。 本文以加害給付的歷史發(fā)展以及對(duì)涉外加害給付中的識(shí)別和法律適用問(wèn)題為切入點(diǎn)，意在探討涉外加害給付在我國(guó)實(shí)踐和立法中的國(guó)際私法方面的完善問(wèn)題，并通過(guò)邏輯的推理與對(duì)現(xiàn)狀的分析，對(duì)業(yè)已存在的我國(guó)立法弊端進(jìn)行總結(jié)和揚(yáng)棄。全文分為四個(gè)部分。 第一部分，加害給付理論的一般概述。加害給付概念的雛形起源于德國(guó)，在這章里面，筆者首先會(huì)對(duì)加害給付理論的“前世”，即，德國(guó)積極侵害債權(quán)理論進(jìn)行分析，爾后再進(jìn)一步分析日本和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的對(duì)加害給付理論的引進(jìn)和成果，最后分析在我國(guó)大陸地區(qū)對(duì)加害給付規(guī)制方法，提出本人對(duì)加害給付概念的一點(diǎn)見(jiàn)解。 第二部分，涉外加害給付中的識(shí)別。這一部分筆者先簡(jiǎn)要闡述了識(shí)別在國(guó)際私法中的一般概念和主要問(wèn)題，，并用歷史和分析方法對(duì)涉外加害給付中的識(shí)別問(wèn)題做出專(zhuān)門(mén)分析，最后提出筆者的一些見(jiàn)解。 第三部分，涉外加害給付法律的選擇和適用。筆者認(rèn)為，法律的選擇和適用是一個(gè)國(guó)家立法的價(jià)值體現(xiàn)，在涉外加害給付的法律選擇上，目前我國(guó)立法那種一刀切的模式已經(jīng)無(wú)法適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的需要，因而筆者在這章中主張要具體問(wèn)題具體分析，不能一味主張合同法律適用時(shí)的最密切聯(lián)系原則，也不能停留在侵權(quán)法律適用時(shí)的有利于被害人原則層面上。 第四部分，涉外加害給付的法律法規(guī)在我國(guó)的完善。這一部分筆者先闡述了國(guó)際條約中實(shí)體法和程序法對(duì)加害給付的有關(guān)要求，最后在對(duì)比兩者的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)私法制度提出自己的見(jiàn)解。
[Abstract]:The concept of injurious payment is a new concept, which belongs to the situation of the concurrence of the liability for breach of contract and the liability for tort, and is also easy to encounter in people's daily life. The essential problem of the liability for injurious payment is the concurrence and aggregation of the liability for breach of contract and the liability for tort. On the one hand, the subject matter of the contract delivered by one party is defective, so it belongs to the act of breach of contract; on the other hand, Because the subject matter of defective payment also caused the other party to perform the loss outside the interests, it is also tort. The concurrence of tort liability and breach of contract liability does not exist in ancient times, but is the product of separation and run-in between tort law and contract law in the history of Yuan Yuan. The problem of liability arising from the issue of injurious payment as a purely domestic law issue, whether it is to adopt a competing attitude or a convergent attitude, or both, will have an impact on private international law. Based on the historical development of injurious pay and the problems of identification and application of law, this paper intends to discuss the perfection of international private law in our country's practice and legislation. Through logical reasoning and analysis of the current situation, the existing shortcomings of our legislation are summarized and abandoned. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part, the general overview of the theory of injurious pay. The embryonic form of the concept of injurious compensation originated in Germany. In this chapter, the author will first analyze the theory of injurious pay, that is, the theory of positive infringement of creditor's rights in Germany. Then it further analyzes the introduction and achievement of the theory of injurious pay in Japan and Taiwan, and finally analyzes the regulation method of injurious payment in mainland China, and puts forward my opinion on the concept of injurious pay. The second part, the identification of the foreign-related injury payment. In this part, the author first briefly expounds the general concept and main problems of identification in private international law, and makes a special analysis of the problem of identification in the process of paying damages to foreigners by historical and analytical methods, and finally puts forward some opinions of the author. The third part, the choice and application of the law of foreign-related injurious compensation. The author thinks that the choice and application of the law is the value of a country's legislation. In the choice of the law concerning the compensation of harm to foreigners, the one-size-fits-all mode of legislation in our country has been unable to meet the needs of economic development. Therefore, in this chapter, the author argues that the specific problems should be analyzed, not only the principle of the closest connection in the application of contract law, but also the principle in favor of the victim in the application of tort law. The fourth part, the consummation of the laws and regulations of the foreign-related injurious pay in our country. In this part, the author first expounds the relevant requirements of substantive law and procedural law in international treaties for the payment of damages, and finally puts forward his own views on the further improvement of the private law system of our country on the basis of comparing the two.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖永平,謝新勝;我國(guó)國(guó)際私法實(shí)踐中的定性錯(cuò)誤[J];法商研究;2005年06期

2 吳德橋;違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合的幾種理論學(xué)說(shuō)評(píng)述[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1991年02期

3 舒瑤芝;侵權(quán)責(zé)任與違約責(zé)任競(jìng)合的探討——兼評(píng)《合同法》第122條的規(guī)定[J];河北法學(xué);2002年03期

4 劉曉紅;論國(guó)際私法中對(duì)涉外合同責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合之處理[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

5 譚良;淺談違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[J];湖南經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

6 王利明;無(wú)效抑或撤銷(xiāo)——對(duì)因欺詐而訂立的合同的再思考[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年02期

7 王小能;《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》中的違約責(zé)任制度[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

8 汪世虎;合同責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年04期

9 李濤;關(guān)于侵權(quán)責(zé)任與合同責(zé)任的競(jìng)合問(wèn)題的初探[J];政法論壇;1996年05期

10 齊樹(shù)潔，郭振忠;合同責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合研究[J];政法論壇;1997年02期

本文編號(hào)：2031359