本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng) + 長臂管轄權(quán)　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：美國的長臂管轄權(quán)是指當(dāng)非法院地居民與法院地間存在某種限度的聯(lián)系,同時(shí)原告提起的訴訟又產(chǎn)生于這種聯(lián)系時(shí),法院對被告所主張的管轄權(quán)。在行使司法管轄權(quán)時(shí),作為一項(xiàng)原則,現(xiàn)代國際法要求在被告與法院地之間有一種較為密切的訴前關(guān)系。美國的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)案件管轄權(quán)制度強(qiáng)調(diào)被告與法院地之間是否形成了某種程度的聯(lián)系,這種尋找爭議案件的被告與法院地內(nèi)在關(guān)系的管轄權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),因其自身的彈性更能適合復(fù)雜的法律關(guān)系的變化,適合本國利益保護(hù)的需要。 本文第一章主要介紹長臂管轄權(quán)的概念、產(chǎn)生背景、理論基礎(chǔ)和行使條件,對長臂管轄權(quán)有一個(gè)宏觀的理解。第二章著重闡釋長臂管轄權(quán)在司法實(shí)踐當(dāng)中運(yùn)用的一系列用于確定“聯(lián)系點(diǎn)”的司法技術(shù),如“滑動(dòng)標(biāo)尺”分析方法、“效果規(guī)則”以及“進(jìn)一步活動(dòng)”說;并結(jié)合經(jīng)典案例對這些分析方法的實(shí)踐有效性和不足作進(jìn)一步論述。第三章首先介紹了國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對長臂管轄權(quán)在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)案件中的運(yùn)用褒貶不一的評價(jià),然后提出了本文對此所持的態(tài)度,并得出美國做法對全球普遍的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)案件管轄權(quán)問題的思考和啟示。
[Abstract]:The long-arm jurisdiction of the United States refers to the jurisdiction claimed by the court against the defendant when there is a certain degree of connection between the residents of the non-forum and the forum, and the litigation initiated by the plaintiff arises from this connection. In the exercise of jurisdiction, as a principle, modern international law requires a close pre-litigation relationship between the defendant and the forum. The Internet case jurisdiction system in the United States emphasizes whether there is a certain degree of connection between the defendant and the forum, which is the jurisdictional standard for searching for the inherent relationship between the defendant and the court in a dispute case. Because of its flexibility, it is more suitable for the changes of complex legal relations and the needs of the protection of national interests. The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of long arm jurisdiction, the background, theoretical basis and exercise conditions, and has a macro understanding of long arm jurisdiction. The second chapter focuses on a series of judicial techniques used to determine "contact points" used in judicial practice, such as "sliding scale" analysis method, "effect rules" and "further activities". Combined with classical cases, the practical effectiveness and shortcomings of these analytical methods are further discussed. The third chapter first introduces the domestic and foreign scholars on the application of long-arm jurisdiction in Internet cases, and then puts forward the attitude of this paper. And draw the American practice to the global universal Internet case jurisdiction question ponder and enlighten.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 孫尚鴻;效果規(guī)則在美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)案件管轄權(quán)領(lǐng)域的適用[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

2 于宏偉,李靜;美國網(wǎng)絡(luò)管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的缺陷[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

3 范錫琴;美國涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)糾紛案件中的長臂管轄權(quán)[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2001年11期

4 郭玉軍,向在勝;網(wǎng)絡(luò)案件中美國法院的長臂管轄權(quán)[J];中國法學(xué);2002年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2031037