本文選題：跨國破產 + 管轄權沖突��； 參考：《蘇州大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：跨國破產管轄權的確定是解決跨國破產問題的前提和基礎,它影響到實體法的選擇和判決的承認與執(zhí)行,直接關系到當事人的切身利益。跨國破產案件的復雜性、各國國內立法的差異、司法主權的爭奪、平行管轄權的采用以及利益沖突是產生管轄權沖突的原因。 跨國破產管轄權的一般標準分為以屬地管轄為基礎的管轄權標準、以屬人管轄為基礎的管轄權標準和以協(xié)議管轄為基礎的管轄權標準。“先受理原則”和“不方便法院原則”作為傳統(tǒng)的解決國際民商事管轄權沖突的原則,可以用來解決跨國破產管轄權沖突。國際合作對于管轄權沖突的解決也十分重要,國家間的相互妥協(xié)和高效合作可以減少和避免管轄權沖突。 國際上主要有三種跨國破產管轄權沖突的解決模式:《美國統(tǒng)一聯(lián)邦破產法》中的管轄權沖突解決模式、《歐盟破產程序規(guī)則》中的管轄權沖突解決模式和聯(lián)合國《跨國破產示范法》中的管轄權沖突解決模式。國內立法對跨國破產管轄權進行自我限制、制定全球性的跨國破產統(tǒng)一法、簽訂國家間的雙邊或多邊條約以及個案直接協(xié)商是解決管轄權沖突的具體途徑。分析我國司法實踐中的跨國破產案例,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國有關跨國破產管轄權的立法依舊空白,相關法律的缺失給司法實踐帶來了困擾。為解決該難題,文章提出在立法上對跨國破產進行集中管轄、借鑒主次破產程序中管轄權標準的建議。
[Abstract]:The determination of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is the premise and foundation of solving the transnational bankruptcy problem. It affects the choice of substantive law and the recognition and enforcement of judgment, and directly relates to the vital interests of the parties concerned. The complexity of transnational bankruptcy cases, the differences of domestic legislation, the contention of judicial sovereignty, the adoption of parallel jurisdiction and the conflict of interests are the causes of jurisdiction conflicts. The general criterion of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is divided into jurisdiction standard based on territorial jurisdiction, jurisdiction standard based on personal jurisdiction and jurisdiction standard based on agreement jurisdiction. As the traditional principle of resolving conflicts of jurisdiction in international civil and commercial affairs, the principle of first admissibility and the principle of inconvenient courts can be used to solve the conflicts of jurisdiction in transnational bankruptcy. International cooperation is also very important for the resolution of jurisdiction conflicts. Mutual compromise and efficient cooperation among countries can reduce and avoid conflicts of jurisdiction. There are mainly three kinds of conflict resolution models of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in the world: the conflict of jurisdiction model in the United federal bankruptcy law of the United states of America, the conflict of jurisdiction model in the rules of bankruptcy procedure of the European union and the United nations The Model Law on Transnational Insolvency (MLCBI): a Model for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction. Domestic legislation limits transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction, formulates global uniform law of transnational bankruptcy, signs bilateral or multilateral treaties between countries and direct negotiation of individual cases is the concrete way to resolve jurisdiction conflicts. By analyzing the cases of transnational bankruptcy in the judicial practice of our country, it is found that the legislation on transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction is still blank, and the lack of relevant laws has troubled the judicial practice. In order to solve this problem, this paper puts forward the suggestion of centralized jurisdiction over transnational bankruptcy in legislation and drawing lessons from the jurisdiction standard in primary and secondary bankruptcy proceedings.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王晗;跨境破產的沖突法問題研究[D];吉林大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2025725