發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-14 12:48

  本文選題：國際商事仲裁協(xié)議 + 《紐約公約》��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：二十世紀(jì)五十年代以來,國際商事仲裁得到了前所未有的發(fā)展,尤其是在二十世紀(jì)末全球化浪潮的推動(dòng)下,伴隨著各國經(jīng)濟(jì)交往的日益加劇以及各類貿(mào)易的頻繁往來,爭議也不斷增多,而各國在司法主權(quán)上從不輕易做出讓步,這也使得國際商事仲裁獲得了更大的發(fā)展機(jī)遇�！霸偌由现俨帽旧硭哂械淖灾涡浴㈧`活性、保密性、民間性等鮮明特點(diǎn),使之贏得當(dāng)事人的普遍青睞,從而也得到了長足的發(fā)展。” 本文第1章從國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的產(chǎn)生開始,介紹了國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的歷史演進(jìn)及所堅(jiān)持的基本理念,并在此基礎(chǔ)之上對國際商事仲裁的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了分析。 第2章介紹國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的形式,分別從《紐約公約》、《國際商事仲裁示范法》以及國際上主要的國家的立法規(guī)定進(jìn)行了介紹,并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的發(fā)展趨勢,結(jié)合各國立法和實(shí)踐的分析,對我國有關(guān)仲裁協(xié)議形式的立法和司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了論述。 第3章介紹了國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)容,從簽訂仲裁協(xié)議當(dāng)事人的主體資格、請求仲裁的意思表示以及可仲裁性等方面分別進(jìn)行了論述,并就此討論了我國現(xiàn)行仲裁法對實(shí)質(zhì)要件的要求；最后本章綜合對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了梳理。 第4章和第5章是本文最為重要的章節(jié),這兩章對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的法律適用問題分開進(jìn)行討論。首先對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議所在的主協(xié)議或原合同的法律適用以及如何來選擇法律進(jìn)行了探討,其次對國際商事仲裁協(xié)議自身的法律適用進(jìn)行了分析,即關(guān)于仲裁協(xié)議的訂立要件、效力等如何適用法律來決定的問題。由于國際商事仲裁協(xié)議條款往往是在國際商事合同之中,只是以一個(gè)條款的形式出現(xiàn),而且在這些合同之中往往只約定了一個(gè)實(shí)體問題的法律適用條款,并未對商事仲裁協(xié)議的法律適用進(jìn)行約定,以致產(chǎn)生了許多的問題。本文將兩者分開來論述,并對未約定商事仲裁協(xié)議法律適用條款的問題如何來適用法律進(jìn)行了論述。 第6章介紹了國際商事仲裁的獨(dú)立性理論,從該理論產(chǎn)生的淵源說起,介紹了該理論的根基、各種學(xué)說以及實(shí)踐中所存在的爭議,最后結(jié)合我國的實(shí)踐分析了仲裁協(xié)議獨(dú)立性理論在我國的確立和應(yīng)用情況。 文章的最后一章總結(jié)了我國國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的立法和實(shí)踐,并在此基礎(chǔ)上指出了現(xiàn)有的不足,提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:Since the 1950s, international commercial arbitration has been an unprecedented development, especially in the end of the twentieth century driven by the wave of globalization, with the increasingly intensified economic exchanges between countries and frequent exchanges of various types of trade. Disputes are also increasing, and countries never make concessions on judicial sovereignty, which makes international commercial arbitration gain more opportunities for development. "coupled with the distinctive features of autonomy, flexibility, confidentiality, and folklore in arbitration itself, it has won the general favor of the parties and has also made considerable progress." The first chapter of this paper begins with the emergence of international commercial arbitration agreement, introduces the historical evolution of international commercial arbitration agreement and its basic concept, and analyzes the nature of international commercial arbitration on this basis. Chapter 2 introduces the form of international commercial arbitration agreement, including the New York Convention, the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the legislative provisions of major international countries. On this basis, the author analyzes the development trend of international commercial arbitration agreement, and discusses the legislation and judicial practice about the form of arbitration agreement in our country combined with the analysis of legislation and practice in various countries. Chapter 3 introduces the substantive content of the international commercial arbitration agreement, discusses the subject qualification of the parties to the arbitration agreement, the expression of intention to request arbitration and the arbitrability, etc. In this paper, the author discusses the substantive requirements of China's current arbitration law, and summarizes the content of the international commercial arbitration agreement in this chapter. Chapter 4 and chapter 5 are the most important chapters in this paper. First of all, it discusses the legal application of the main agreement or the original contract of the international commercial arbitration agreement and how to choose the law, and then analyzes the legal application of the international commercial arbitration agreement itself. That is to say, how to apply the law to the conclusion and validity of the arbitration agreement. Because the provisions of an international commercial arbitration agreement are often in the form of a single clause in an international commercial contract, and in these contracts only the applicable provisions of the law on a substantive issue are often agreed upon, No agreement has been made on the application of the law to commercial arbitration agreement, which has caused many problems. This paper discusses the two separately, and discusses how to apply the law to the unagreed commercial arbitration agreement. Chapter 6 introduces the independence theory of international commercial arbitration, starting from the origin of the theory, introduces the foundation of the theory, various theories and disputes in practice. Finally, the establishment and application of the independence theory of arbitration agreement in China are analyzed. The last chapter summarizes the legislation and practice of China's international commercial arbitration agreement, points out the existing deficiencies, and puts forward some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜新麗;論外國仲裁裁決在我國的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行——兼論《紐約公約》在中國的適用[J];比較法研究;2005年04期

2 朱巍;公共政策保留與國際商事仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行[J];北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

3 張賓;;對國際體育仲裁院仲裁裁決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行問題的思考[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

4 李彩霞;;網(wǎng)上仲裁地法律問題研究[J];北京仲裁;2005年01期

5 宋艷麗;;論仲裁中的調(diào)解[J];北京仲裁;2005年01期

6 楊良宜;;關(guān)于可仲裁性(一)[J];北京仲裁;2005年03期

7 趙秀文;;淺談我國仲裁裁決的分類[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期

8 周佳;;1958年《紐約公約》第一條述評——兼論我國仲裁法律體系下的國際商事仲裁裁決的國籍[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期

9 陳立峰;王海量;;論我國《仲裁法》的管轄范圍[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期

10 李夢園;宋連斌;;論社會(huì)公共利益與商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督——對我國法院若干司法實(shí)踐的分析[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 周清華;國際商事仲裁自裁管轄原則消極效力研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

2 孫得勝;國際商事仲裁協(xié)議的效力問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

3 趙寧;國際商事仲裁裁決撤銷制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

4 齊湘泉;外國仲裁裁決承認(rèn)及執(zhí)行若干法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

5 劉鳳泉;現(xiàn)代商事促裁制度研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2017440