本文選題：WTO + 爭端解決機(jī)制��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：WTO自1995年成立以來,其爭端解決機(jī)制在處理國際經(jīng)貿(mào)糾紛方面發(fā)揮著日益重要的作用,這是有目共睹的。但是,我們?nèi)匀徊荒苷fWTO爭端解決機(jī)制是完善而成熟的,許多成員方都對它提出了批評意見。對WTO爭端解決機(jī)制進(jìn)行修改的談判由來已久,但是多年未果。在2004年5月28日的一次特會上,各成員方一致認(rèn)為,對DSU進(jìn)行修改的談判仍然需要更多的時間。如今,國際社會對爭端解決機(jī)制進(jìn)行修改的談判日益關(guān)注,在這個背景下,對爭端解決機(jī)制的缺陷和問題進(jìn)行研究和闡釋是十分緊迫和必要的。 爭端解決機(jī)制被認(rèn)為是以規(guī)則為導(dǎo)向的WTO體系的最重要的支柱。WTO爭端解決機(jī)制在一定程度上增加了爭端解決的效率和可預(yù)見性,但它對發(fā)展中國家的實際作用遠(yuǎn)低于原先的設(shè)想,不能被發(fā)展中國家公平、有效地利用,在某些方面甚至對發(fā)展中國家的利益不利,因此,亟需進(jìn)一步的改進(jìn)。由于成員各方利益的沖突和技術(shù)方面的原因,目前對爭端解決機(jī)制的改革進(jìn)程并不順利,實現(xiàn)使WTO爭端解決機(jī)制更加公平合理的改革目標(biāo)尚需發(fā)展中國家的共同努力。 研究WTO爭端解決機(jī)制,包括如磋商程序問題、專家組程序問題、上訴機(jī)構(gòu)的職權(quán)等問題。爭議雙方提請WTO爭端解決機(jī)制解決爭議,及專家組與上訴機(jī)構(gòu)用于解決爭端的法律淵源有哪些,對當(dāng)事方而言意義重大,往往決定了爭議的最后結(jié)果。 為了可以公平、有效地利用這一機(jī)制,我國除了需要加強(qiáng)自己法律隊伍的建設(shè),聯(lián)合力量建立區(qū)域性機(jī)構(gòu),合作解決人才問題,還應(yīng)該積極向理事會提出改進(jìn)WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的要求的議案,以維護(hù)自身的正當(dāng)利益。也為我國能主動參與定制國際貿(mào)易規(guī)則,得到一個大國所應(yīng)有的國際發(fā)言權(quán)搭建了一個堅實的平臺。 綜上所述,本文試圖通過對WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的由來、特點及不足之處的論述,以及介紹WTO各成員方對爭端解決機(jī)制改革所提出的建議,就中國如何更好地應(yīng)對WTO爭端機(jī)制改革進(jìn)行一些研究,希望能從中得到一些有益的啟示。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of WTO in 1995, its dispute settlement mechanism has played an increasingly important role in dealing with international economic and trade disputes, which is obvious to all. However, we still can not say that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is perfect and mature, and many members have criticized it. The WTO dispute settlement mechanism has been revised for a long time, but failed for many years. At a special meeting on May 28, 2004, members agreed that more time was needed to negotiate changes to the DSU. Today, the international community is paying more and more attention to the negotiations on the revision of the dispute settlement mechanism. In this context, It is very urgent and necessary to study and explain the defects and problems of the dispute settlement mechanism. The dispute settlement mechanism is considered to be the most important pillar of the rules-based WTO system.WTO dispute settlement mechanism to a certain extent Increasing the efficiency and predictability of dispute settlement, However, its practical role for developing countries is far less than originally envisaged, and it cannot be used equitably and efficiently by developing countries, and in some respects it is even detrimental to the interests of developing countries. Therefore, further improvement is urgently needed. The current process of reform of the dispute settlement mechanism has not been smooth owing to conflicts of interest and technical reasons among the members, To realize the reform goal of making WTO dispute settlement mechanism more equitable and reasonable, it is necessary for developing countries to make joint efforts, and to study WTO dispute settlement mechanism, including such issues as consultation procedure, panel procedure and the authority of the appellate body, etc. The parties to the dispute request the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO, and the sources of law used by the panel and the appellate body to settle the dispute, which are of great significance to the parties and often determine the final outcome of the dispute. In order to be fair, In order to make effective use of this mechanism, apart from strengthening the construction of our own legal contingent, establishing regional organizations and cooperating in solving the problem of talents, our country should actively propose to the Council a bill to improve the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. To defend one's own legitimate interests. It also provides a solid platform for China to actively participate in the customization of international trade rules and get the international voice due to a great power. In summary, this paper attempts to analyze the origin of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This paper discusses the characteristics and inadequacies, introduces the suggestions made by WTO members on the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism, and makes some studies on how China can better deal with the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO, hoping to get some useful enlightenment from it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李燕燕;國際貿(mào)易中的競爭政策及其多邊協(xié)調(diào)[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年11期

2 鄭小敏;論WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的執(zhí)行程序[J];長沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

3 劉虎;;如何應(yīng)對WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的缺陷[J];大經(jīng)貿(mào);2001年10期

4 黃元超,蔣海勇,周濤;論我國如何運(yùn)用DSB解決貿(mào)易爭端[J];廣西財政高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2005年03期

5 夏娟;;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制存在的問題及對策研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年30期

6 ;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制概述[J];金融發(fā)展評論;2011年02期

7 張乃根;;WTO爭端解決的“中國年”(2009):回顧與展望[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2010年03期

8 潘星容;紀(jì)宗宜;;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制中的舉證責(zé)任研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 崔盈;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制缺陷與完善研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2004年

2 馬新宇;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的評價和我國的應(yīng)對策略[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

3 張愛娥;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的缺陷與問題[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

4 蔡建東;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2003年

5 丁勇;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制實證分析[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

6 王海濤;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的演變與中國的對策[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

7 侯琨;WTO爭端解決機(jī)制與我國的對策研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2009257