發(fā)布時間：2018-06-04 13:20

  本文選題：間接征收 + 認定標準��； 參考：《廣西師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：間接征收問題從上世紀70年代以來,開始受到理論界和實務界的關(guān)注。但是由于當前的間接征收理論和實踐并不完善,如各國、各仲裁庭對于間接征收的含義、如何判定間接征收等都有著不同的理解,從而導致間接征收爭端成為當前國際投資爭端的“高產(chǎn)區(qū)”。筆者欲通過本文,探討間接征收的幾個主要法律問題。 本文除引言及結(jié)語外共分四章。 第一章主要介紹了間接征收的概念及其構(gòu)成要件。間接征收是從征收發(fā)展而來,第一節(jié)主要闡述了征收的含義以及與征收相類似的國有化的含義,并比較了征收和國有化的關(guān)系；第二節(jié)主要內(nèi)容是間接征收問題的源起、間接征收的含義以及間接征收與征收的關(guān)系,其中對間接征收的含義從學界、國際條約、國際投資協(xié)定等方面進行了詳細的論述；第三節(jié)分析了間接征收的構(gòu)成要件,其主要包括：主觀上要有保護公共利益的目的；符合可以適用的國內(nèi)法和法律程序；遵循非歧視性原則；應當給予補償；行為造成了投資者利益受損。第一章是對間接征收問題一個總體上的把握。 第二章主要闡述了間接征收認定方法的分析。目前的理論界和實務界把間接征收的認定方法主要分為三種,即純粹效果標準,目的標準,效果與目的兼顧標準。本章從三種標準的概念入手,通過國際法實踐中的一些具體案例,討論其是如何適用,并且對各種標準進行客觀的評價。通過對比,筆者認為,效果與目的兼顧標準是最為合理的認定方法。在這三種標準外,本章還論述了判定間接征收的兩個輔助標準：比例原則和三要素原則,并對如何運用上述原則認定間接征收做出分析。 第三章主要介紹了間接征收的五種爭端解決機制,即伊美求償庭、ICSID. NAFTA、MIGA、歐洲人權(quán)法院。在對五種機制作出簡單介紹后,通過案例分析等方法對五種有關(guān)間接征收的爭端解決機制做出了深度的分析,并且比較五者的不同,得出筆者的觀點。筆者認為ICSID是解決間接征收爭端最合適的機制,并對此進行分析。 第四章主要介紹了我國有關(guān)間接征收法律。第一節(jié)根據(jù)我國投資現(xiàn)狀,點明我國目前面臨的兩大風險：作為投資者東道國被訴間接征收的風險和我國的海外投資被東道國征收的風險,通過相關(guān)的數(shù)據(jù)和案例佐證。第二節(jié)是我國有關(guān)間接征收的立法,國內(nèi)法上關(guān)于間接征收的立法不多,主要是在我國同他國締結(jié)的雙邊投資條約或其他協(xié)定中。其中重點介紹了中印BIT中有關(guān)間接征收的規(guī)定。第三節(jié)是筆者提出的我國應當如何應對當前的間接征收情況,包括明確國內(nèi)法中公共利益的界定；投資協(xié)定中對間接征收做出具體的定義以及謹慎的對待ICSID管轄權(quán)。
[Abstract]:Since the 70s of last century, the issue of indirect expropriation has attracted the attention of both the theoretical and practical circles. However, because the current indirect collection theory and practice are not perfect, such as countries, the arbitral tribunals have different explanations for the meaning of the indirect expropriation and how to determine the indirect expropriation, which leads to the indirect levying dispute as the current international. The author wants to discuss several major legal issues of indirect expropriation through this article.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of indirect expropriation and its constituent elements. The first section mainly expounds the meaning of expropriation and the meaning of nationalization, and compares the relationship between expropriation and nationalization. The second section is mainly about the origin of the problem of indirect expropriation and the indirect levying of it. The meaning and the relation of indirect expropriation and expropriation are discussed in detail from the academic circles, international treaties and international investment agreements, and the third section analyses the elements of indirect expropriation, which mainly include: subjectively, the purpose of protecting the public interests; conforming to the applicable domestic law and legal process Order; follow the principle of non discrimination; compensation should be given; investors' interests will be impaired by behavior. The first chapter is a general grasp of indirect expropriation.
The second chapter mainly expounds the analysis of the method of identification of indirect expropriation. The current theoretical and practical circles mainly divide the methods of identification of indirect expropriation into three kinds, namely, the standard of pure effect, the standard of purpose, the effect and the purpose of the standard. This chapter starts with the concept of three standards, and discusses it as a result of some specific cases in the practice of international law. What is applicable and objectively appraise all kinds of standards. By contrast, I think that the criterion of both effect and purpose is the most reasonable method of identification. In addition to these three standards, this chapter also discusses two auxiliary criteria for determining Indirect Expropriation: the principle of proportion and the original of the three elements, and the indirect expropriation of how to use the above principles. Make an analysis.
The third chapter mainly introduces five kinds of dispute settlement mechanism of indirect expropriation, namely, the imimation court, ICSID. NAFTA, MIGA, the European Court of human rights. After a brief introduction to the five mechanisms, the paper makes a deep analysis of the five kinds of dispute settlement mechanism of indirect expropriation through case analysis and so on, and compares the differences between the five, and draws a pen. The author thinks that ICSID is the most appropriate mechanism to solve the indirect expropriation dispute and analyze it.
The fourth chapter mainly introduces the indirect expropriation law in our country. The first section, according to the current situation of our country's investment, points out the two risks that China is facing at present: the risk of the indirect expropriation of the investor's host country and the risk imposed by the host country on the overseas investment of our country, and through the related data and cases. The second section is the state of our country. There is not much legislation on indirect expropriation in domestic law, mainly in bilateral investment treaties or other agreements that China has concluded with other countries. The emphasis is on the provisions on indirect expropriation in China and India in BIT. The third section is the author's suggestion that our country should deal with the current situation of indirect expropriation, including clear domestic law. The definition of the public interest; the specific definition of indirect expropriation in the investment agreement and the prudent treatment of ICSID jurisdiction.
【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 楊慧芳;;投資者合理期待原則研究[J];河北法學;2010年04期

2 王楠;;試析外資公平公正待遇標準[J];時代法學;2008年06期

3 羅飛鳳;;中國對外投資新趨勢[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào);2011年09期

4 鄧永杰;劉德吉;;財產(chǎn)權(quán)與《歐洲人權(quán)公約第一議定書》[J];社會科學動態(tài);1998年12期

5 徐崇利;;利益平衡與對外資間接征收的認定及補償[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2008年06期

6 蔡從燕;;效果標準與目的標準之爭:間接征收認定的新發(fā)展[J];西南政法大學學報;2006年06期

7 金學凌;;雙邊投資條約與發(fā)展中國家——兼論中國應對之策[J];西南政法大學學報;2010年03期

8 王楠;;中外雙邊投資協(xié)定對香港的適用問題——評中外雙邊投資協(xié)定第一案管轄權(quán)意見[J];行政與法;2010年06期

9 范劍虹;歐盟與德國的比例原則——內(nèi)涵、淵源、適用與在中國的借鑒[J];浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年05期

，

本文編號：1977508