本文選題：最密切聯(lián)系原則 + 涉外合同�。� 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為當(dāng)代國(guó)際私法中的一項(xiàng)基本原則,最密切聯(lián)系原則產(chǎn)生于合同領(lǐng)域,而后以其穩(wěn)定性和靈活性兼具的優(yōu)勢(shì)相繼在侵權(quán)、國(guó)籍沖突、人身關(guān)系、管轄權(quán)的確定等多個(gè)領(lǐng)域得到適用。最密切聯(lián)系原則作為涉外合同法律選擇的基本指導(dǎo)思想,已經(jīng)在世界各國(guó)的法律規(guī)定和司法實(shí)踐中得到充分體現(xiàn)。通過(guò)比較分析和實(shí)證分析的方法,研究世界各國(guó)對(duì)于最密切聯(lián)系原則在立法方面規(guī)定和司法實(shí)踐,既可以為中國(guó)準(zhǔn)確適用該原則提供相應(yīng)的參考,同時(shí)可為最密切聯(lián)系原則的發(fā)展指明方向。文章第一部分首先闡述了最密切聯(lián)系原則的定義及其在合同領(lǐng)域的歷史沿革�！白蠲芮新�(lián)系原則”的核心在于“最密切聯(lián)系點(diǎn)”的確定。薩維尼的“法律關(guān)系本座說(shuō)”通常被認(rèn)為是最密切聯(lián)系原則理論起源；19世紀(jì)50年代,英美法院的相關(guān)司法判例為其奠定了實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)；美國(guó)《沖突法重述(第二次)》的出版標(biāo)志了最密切聯(lián)系原則在合同領(lǐng)域適用的確立。其次分析了最密切聯(lián)系原則適用的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足之處。最密切聯(lián)系原則優(yōu)勢(shì)在于突破傳統(tǒng)沖突規(guī)范的束縛,協(xié)調(diào)與融合了不同的法律利益與關(guān)系。其不足之處在于法律適用的不確定性及增加訴訟成本。文章第二部分,首先闡述了行為地法原則、意思自治原則、最密切聯(lián)系原則及合同自體法四種理論在確定合同準(zhǔn)據(jù)法方面的適用情況。其次分析了最密切聯(lián)系原則在國(guó)外的“純粹型、改良型、融入型”三種立法模式。再次,闡述合同要素分析、特征分析、結(jié)果分析三種確定最密切聯(lián)系點(diǎn)的判斷方法；最后,實(shí)證分析了隨著國(guó)際交往的增多及網(wǎng)絡(luò)的興起出現(xiàn)的國(guó)際電子商務(wù)合同、國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)合同、國(guó)際消費(fèi)合同及國(guó)際勞務(wù)合同等新型合同中適用最密切聯(lián)系原則的情況。第三部分,文章分析了最密切聯(lián)系原則在中國(guó)合同領(lǐng)域的國(guó)內(nèi)立法及司法實(shí)踐的現(xiàn)狀,指出我國(guó)在相關(guān)立法和司法實(shí)踐方面存在的不足之處,并有針對(duì)性的提出改進(jìn)的建議。
[Abstract]:As a basic principle in contemporary private international law, the principle of the closest connection arises in the field of contract, and then, with its advantages of both stability and flexibility, it is followed by torts, conflicts of nationality and personal relations. The determination of jurisdiction and other fields have been applied. As the basic guiding ideology of the choice of foreign contract law, the principle of the closest connection has been fully embodied in the legal provisions and judicial practice of the countries all over the world. By means of comparative analysis and empirical analysis, this paper studies the legislative provisions and judicial practice of the most closely related principle in the world, which can provide a corresponding reference for China to apply the principle accurately. At the same time, it can show the direction for the development of the principle of the closest connection. In the first part, the definition of the closest relation principle and its history in the field of contract are introduced. The core of the closeness principle lies in the determination of the closest contact point. Savini's "legal relation theory" is generally considered to be the origin of the theory of the principle of closest connection. In the 1850s, the relevant judicial cases of British and American courts laid a practical foundation for it. The publication of the American restatement of conflict of laws (second time) marks the establishment of the principle of closest connection in the field of contracts. Secondly, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the application of the closest relation principle. The advantage of the closest relation principle lies in breaking through the shackles of traditional conflict norms and coordinating and merging different legal interests and relations. Its deficiency lies in the uncertainty of the application of law and the increase of litigation cost. In the second part, the author first expounds the application of four theories, namely, the principle of territorial law of conduct, the principle of autonomy of will, the principle of the closest connection and the law of contract itself in determining the applicable law of contract. Secondly, it analyzes the three legislative models of "pure type, improved type and integration type" of the closest relation principle in foreign countries. Thirdly, it expounds three methods to determine the closest contact point, including contract element analysis, characteristic analysis and result analysis. Finally, it analyzes the international electronic commerce contract with the increase of international communication and the rise of network. International intellectual property contracts, international consumption contracts and international labor contracts and other new contracts applicable to the closest contact principle. In the third part, the article analyzes the current situation of the domestic legislation and judicial practice of the principle of the closest connection in the field of contracts in China, points out the shortcomings of the relevant legislation and judicial practice in our country, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王艷妮;;淺談最密切聯(lián)系原則的適用及在我國(guó)的完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2011年06期

2 王瑞雪;;關(guān)于我國(guó)電子商務(wù)立法問(wèn)題的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];硅谷;2008年16期

3 楊玲梅;;簡(jiǎn)論我國(guó)實(shí)踐中的最密切聯(lián)系原則[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年23期

4 袁泉;;傳統(tǒng)國(guó)際私法連接點(diǎn)在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境中所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)及其應(yīng)對(duì)方略[J];河北法學(xué);2009年03期

5 許順亭;方杰;;最密切聯(lián)系原則法律地位之我見(jiàn)[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

6 江保國(guó);劉子呢;;最密切聯(lián)系原則的適當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)及其改進(jìn)——一個(gè)權(quán)力分享的視角[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

7 申婷婷;;中國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中涉外合同法律適用的問(wèn)題——兼談《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》第41條及相關(guān)司法解釋的運(yùn)用[J];理論界;2011年08期

8 劉玲;李雅;馮京政;;論合同領(lǐng)域的最密切聯(lián)系原則[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2008年26期

9 王以君;喬雄兵;;電子商務(wù)法研究的新成果——評(píng)《統(tǒng)一合同法的新發(fā)展—〈國(guó)際合同使用電子通信公約〉評(píng)述》[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

10 黃曉慧;;關(guān)于電子商務(wù)立法的若干法律問(wèn)題探析[J];仲裁研究;2008年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 申亞林;關(guān)于最密切聯(lián)系原則有關(guān)問(wèn)題的思考[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

2 史蕾;論最密切聯(lián)系原則及其新發(fā)展[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

3 仇華;試論最密切聯(lián)系原則[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

4 毛銳;論最密切聯(lián)系原則的適用[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1972415