本文選題：涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 地域性��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》的制定是我國(guó)法律體系建設(shè)的重大進(jìn)步,將產(chǎn)生積極的國(guó)際影響。“涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法”是其重要的組成部分,涉及到涉外民事主體、涉外繼承、涉外債權(quán)等涉外民事關(guān)系的諸多方面,與該法總則部分的關(guān)系尤為密切,使得它在《法律適用法》中占有著重要地位。 涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法是我國(guó)國(guó)際私法立法者和學(xué)者在廣泛借鑒當(dāng)代國(guó)際私法的先進(jìn)理論成果,吸取當(dāng)前世界各國(guó)先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),并充分總結(jié)我國(guó)三十年來(lái)的立法與司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上制定出臺(tái)的,具有一定的先進(jìn)性和包容性,表明我國(guó)已告別了保守、落后的狀態(tài),進(jìn)入了世界涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法立法的先進(jìn)行列�？紤]到我國(guó)涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用的實(shí)務(wù)工作需要,參照發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的國(guó)際私法法典的相關(guān)規(guī)定,我國(guó)涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法尚有一些為現(xiàn)實(shí)所需的內(nèi)容還沒(méi)有囊括進(jìn)來(lái),這些還有待于在今后的立法和司法解釋中加以完善。對(duì)于本文,筆者采用歷史研究的方法、比較研究的方法、法解釋學(xué)的方法,從梳理本法出臺(tái)的法律環(huán)境,即涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)及其國(guó)際、國(guó)內(nèi)保護(hù)入手,進(jìn)而分析總結(jié)新出臺(tái)的涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法的立法價(jià)值取向,圍繞新法法條比較其他國(guó)家的做法,逐條分析立法的特點(diǎn),指出足與不足之處,最后提出筆者的觀點(diǎn)或設(shè)想,以期對(duì)我國(guó)涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律適用法的進(jìn)一步完善盡一份國(guó)際私法學(xué)子應(yīng)盡之力。
[Abstract]:The formulation of the applicable Law on Foreign Civil Relations is an important progress in the construction of China's legal system and will have a positive international impact. The Law on the legal Application of Foreign intellectual property Rights is an important part of the law, which involves many aspects of the civil relations concerning foreign affairs, such as foreign civil subject, foreign inheritance, foreign creditor's rights and so on, and is particularly closely related to the general provisions of the law. It makes it play an important role in the applicable Law of the Law. The law applicable to foreign intellectual property rights is an advanced theoretical achievement of contemporary private international law widely used for reference by Chinese private international law legislators and scholars, drawing on the current advanced legislative experience of various countries in the world. On the basis of summing up the legislative and judicial practice experience of the past 30 years, it is advanced and inclusive to a certain extent, indicating that our country has said goodbye to the conservative and backward state. Has entered the world foreign intellectual property rights law applicable law legislation advanced ranks. Considering the practical needs of the legal application of foreign intellectual property rights in our country, and referring to the relevant provisions of the private international law codes of developed countries, there are still some contents which are still not included in the practical requirements of the law applicable to foreign intellectual property rights in China, These still need to be perfected in the future legislative and judicial interpretation. For this article, the author adopts the method of historical research, the method of comparative study, the method of legal hermeneutics, starting with combing the legal environment of this law, that is, foreign intellectual property right and its international and domestic protection. Then it analyzes and summarizes the legislative value orientation of the new applicable law on foreign intellectual property rights, compares the practice of other countries around the new law, analyzes the characteristics of the legislation article by article, points out the sufficient and insufficient points, and finally puts forward the author's viewpoints or ideas. In order to further improve the applicable law of foreign intellectual property rights in China, a private international law student should do his best.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭德忠;;完整的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬制度的確立——論科學(xué)技術(shù)進(jìn)步法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的結(jié)合[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 萬(wàn)鄂湘,馮潔菡;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)的新發(fā)展[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年10期

3 姜茹嬌;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的法律適用——兼評(píng)我國(guó)《民法(草案)》第九編的有關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

4 黃道雄;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律沖突與法律適用[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

5 王舒;尋求最佳保護(hù)度——全球統(tǒng)一知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1996年08期

6 羅靜;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律沖突及法律適用理論探究[J];湖湘論壇;2007年03期

7 石巍;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律適用[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期

8 呂巖峰;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)之沖突法評(píng)論[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1996年06期

9 鄧詞;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律適用[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2005年S1期

10 姜茹嬌;從沖突法角度論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2005年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 致遠(yuǎn)（最高人民法院）;[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1963866