發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-28 20:07

  本文選題：預(yù)防權(quán) + 職務(wù)犯罪　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：預(yù)防職務(wù)犯罪與腐敗是世界各國共同面臨的難題。腐敗不僅阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，損害政府的威信，而且對(duì)國家的穩(wěn)定構(gòu)成潛在的威脅，隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和區(qū)域一體化的進(jìn)程，腐敗犯罪越發(fā)呈現(xiàn)出有組織、跨國化的趨勢(shì)。加強(qiáng)國際反腐敗司法協(xié)作以遏制腐敗，成為各國反腐敗的共同愿望和迫切要求，于是《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》這一全球性的反腐敗法律文件應(yīng)運(yùn)而生了。我國政府已于2003年12月10日簽署了該公約。 為適應(yīng)《公約》的要求，我國先后制定和修改了一系列涉及反腐敗的法律法規(guī)，但至今尚無預(yù)防和懲治職務(wù)犯罪的專門立法，使得相當(dāng)一部分嚴(yán)重危害社會(huì)的行為沒有被規(guī)定為犯罪，，查處職務(wù)犯罪的法律手段仍存欠缺，預(yù)防和懲治職務(wù)犯罪的法律制度還不夠完善。這就需要我們正視其中存在的問題并加以完善。 本文在吸收國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)有反腐敗法學(xué)理論成果的基礎(chǔ)上，借鑒《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》的若干法律機(jī)制和其他國家的先進(jìn)司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，就如何在職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防中應(yīng)用預(yù)防權(quán)進(jìn)行了深入探討。本研究首先對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防權(quán)相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行了闡述，包括腐敗與職務(wù)犯罪的概念與特征、職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防的特征與歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)、預(yù)防權(quán)的基本理論與要素構(gòu)成；然后對(duì)《公約》中對(duì)預(yù)防權(quán)的規(guī)定及其在各國的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行了總結(jié)與分析，并以英國、美國和新加坡為例，介紹了國外預(yù)防職務(wù)犯罪的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)，第四章探討了我國職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防的現(xiàn)狀與存在的問題，對(duì)《公約》在我國的應(yīng)用及其障礙，對(duì)我國職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防的影響，我國職務(wù)犯罪預(yù)防權(quán)應(yīng)用的現(xiàn)狀與問題進(jìn)行了分析，最后結(jié)合《公約》要求，從法制建設(shè)、機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)、預(yù)防建議權(quán)、預(yù)防檢察權(quán)、預(yù)防審查等方面，提出了完善我國預(yù)防權(quán)的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:Prevention of duty crime and corruption is a common problem all over the world. Corruption not only hinders the economic development, damages the authority of the government, but also poses a potential threat to the stability of the country. With the process of economic globalization and regional integration, the corruption crime is becoming more and more organized and transnational. Strengthening the international judicial cooperation against corruption to curb corruption has become the common desire and urgent demand of all countries in the fight against corruption, so the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), a global anti-corruption legal document, emerged as the times require. My Government signed the Convention on 10 December 2003. In order to meet the requirements of the Convention, China has successively formulated and amended a series of laws and regulations relating to the fight against corruption, but there is no special legislation to prevent and punish job-related crimes. So that a considerable number of serious harm to society behavior has not been prescribed as a crime, the legal means to investigate and deal with job-related crimes are still lacking, and the legal system to prevent and punish job-related crimes is not perfect. This requires us to face up to the existing problems and improve them. On the basis of absorbing the existing theories of anti-corruption law at home and abroad, this paper draws lessons from the legal mechanisms of the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the advanced judicial experience of other countries. This paper discusses how to apply the right of prevention in the prevention of duty crime. At first, this study expounds the relevant theories of the right to prevent duty crime, including the concept and characteristics of corruption and duty crime, the characteristics and historical experience of the prevention of duty crime, the basic theory and essential elements of the right of prevention. Then it summarizes and analyzes the provisions of the Convention on the right to prevention and its application in various countries, and takes the United Kingdom, the United States and Singapore as examples to introduce the successful experiences of foreign countries in the prevention of job-related crimes. The fourth chapter discusses the present situation and existing problems of the prevention of job-related crimes in China, analyzes the application of the Convention in China and its obstacles, the impact on the prevention of job-related crimes in China, and the current situation and problems of the application of the right to prevent the crime of duty in China. Finally, according to the requirements of the Convention, the author puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for perfecting the right of prevention in China from the aspects of legal system construction, institution building, right of advice for prevention, power of procuratorial power of prevention, and examination of prevention and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9;D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 皮勇;《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》及其對(duì)我國反腐敗法律機(jī)制的影響[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年01期

2 孫永軍,張芳,李樹濤;關(guān)于檢察機(jī)關(guān)開展貪污賄賂犯罪預(yù)防工作機(jī)制的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年02期

3 孫謙;中國的檢察改革[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年06期

4 孫謙,尹伊君;國家工作人員職務(wù)犯罪論[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年04期

5 曹呈宏;分權(quán)制衡中的檢察權(quán)定位[J];人民檢察;2002年11期

6 嚴(yán)桂新,唐元高;檢察預(yù)防權(quán)初探[J];人民檢察;2005年07期

7 張仲芳;論人民監(jiān)督員對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪公訴工作的監(jiān)督[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

8 韓錦霞;齊艷敏;;我國現(xiàn)行的檢察權(quán)制約機(jī)制及立法完善[J];人民檢察;2008年05期

9 王黎;;解讀和諧社會(huì)前提下的檢察偵查權(quán)配置[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

10 郭秀清;論預(yù)防與懲治職務(wù)犯罪的有效途徑[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2003年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 左衛(wèi)民 匡科;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

本文編號(hào)：1948010