本文選題：海上人工島嶼 + 聯(lián)合國海洋法公約　； 參考：《社會科學(xué)》2017年06期

【摘要】：中國在南海諸島填海、擴(kuò)建機(jī)場等陸地設(shè)施引發(fā)國際社會廣泛關(guān)注,以UNCLOS為首的國際法對于海上人工島嶼并沒有明確的定義,導(dǎo)致人工島嶼的概念適用模糊。海上人工島嶼具有受國際法與國內(nèi)法雙重調(diào)整的法律特征,但其權(quán)利義務(wù)邊界尚不明確,人工島嶼能否作為領(lǐng)海劃界的依據(jù)存在爭議。通過對人工島嶼的分類討論,明確海上人工島嶼具有的權(quán)利、義務(wù)邊界閾值,根據(jù)人工島嶼修建的基礎(chǔ)判斷其能否作為劃界的基礎(chǔ)。我國在南海進(jìn)行的人工島嶼修建符合國際法規(guī)定,在海上人工島嶼概念的解釋中我國應(yīng)發(fā)揮更大話語權(quán),并通過制訂《海洋基本法》為修建海上人工島嶼提供國內(nèi)法依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:China's reclamation in the South China Sea Islands, the expansion of the airport and other land facilities have aroused wide attention from the international community. The international law, led by the UNCLOS, has no definite definition for the artificial islands of the sea, which leads to the fuzzy concept of artificial islands. The artificial islands of the sea have the legal characteristics of the double adjustment of international law and domestic law, but their rights and obligations are under the edge of the law. It is not clear that whether the artificial islands can be demarcated as the boundary of the territorial sea is controversial. Through the classification and discussion of the artificial islands, the rights of the artificial islands on the sea, the threshold of the compulsory boundary, and the basis of the construction of artificial islands, can be judged as the basis for the demarcation. It is stipulated that in the interpretation of the concept of artificial islands on the sea, our country should give full play to the right to speak more language, and to provide the basis for the construction of the artificial islands of the sea by formulating the basic law of the sea.
，

本文編號：1930661