本文選題：涉外隱私 + 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)��； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著時(shí)代發(fā)展,涉外隱私侵權(quán)是一個(gè)日益頻發(fā)的法律現(xiàn)象。從表面上看,它僅僅是一個(gè)含有涉外因素的普通民事侵權(quán),與一般涉外侵權(quán)并無(wú)顯著區(qū)別;就其法律后果而言,它卻深刻影響到一國(guó)的言論自由、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)以及數(shù)據(jù)挖掘行業(yè)等方面的發(fā)展。為了更加全面地維護(hù)國(guó)家利益,有必要對(duì)現(xiàn)有的涉外隱私侵權(quán)法律適用規(guī)則進(jìn)行檢討。在現(xiàn)代社會(huì),由于隱私權(quán)內(nèi)容彈性大,侵權(quán)途徑特殊,并與公權(quán)力以及其它私權(quán)利互有牽連,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)涉外隱私侵權(quán)的法律適用規(guī)則進(jìn)行審慎取舍。從目前的立法實(shí)踐可以看出,包括我國(guó)在內(nèi)世界上大多數(shù)國(guó)家沒(méi)有對(duì)涉外隱私侵權(quán)的法律適用問(wèn)題進(jìn)行重視,國(guó)際統(tǒng)一實(shí)體法方面的合作進(jìn)展緩慢,收效甚微,并且局面難以在短時(shí)間內(nèi)得到改善,由此帶來(lái)的直接影響便是大量案件需要通過(guò)沖突法加以解決。國(guó)內(nèi)立法者注意到了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)等新興傳媒手段給涉外隱私侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域所帶來(lái)的影響,并制定了相應(yīng)規(guī)定。不可否認(rèn),該項(xiàng)規(guī)定具備一定的合理性與科學(xué)性,但是內(nèi)容過(guò)于單一,無(wú)法更好滿足實(shí)踐需要。基于此,本篇論文以如何完善國(guó)內(nèi)涉外隱私侵權(quán)沖突規(guī)則為主線展開(kāi)論述。研究方法上,以價(jià)值分析為主,比較分析為輔。結(jié)構(gòu)上,文章分為四個(gè)部分,從相關(guān)角度來(lái)分析涉外隱私侵權(quán)法律適用規(guī)則。第一部分首先介紹涉外隱私侵權(quán)的嚴(yán)峻現(xiàn)實(shí)并分析其特點(diǎn)。與此同時(shí),著重分析了相應(yīng)的國(guó)際統(tǒng)一實(shí)體規(guī)則以及現(xiàn)有沖突規(guī)則,認(rèn)為現(xiàn)有規(guī)則不能有效滿足國(guó)家的利益訴求,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)有規(guī)則做出進(jìn)一步完善。第二部分論述涉外隱私侵權(quán)法律適用連接點(diǎn)的選擇問(wèn)題。在分析侵權(quán)行為地作為連接點(diǎn)不再合適之后,承認(rèn)被侵權(quán)人經(jīng)常居所地有其內(nèi)在的合理性。然而,被侵權(quán)人經(jīng)常居所地不能妥善地平衡各種利益,與其作用相互補(bǔ)的侵權(quán)人經(jīng)常居所地便被納入考慮范圍。第三部分研究了意思自治引入的必要性,認(rèn)為僅僅引入經(jīng)常居所地這一連接點(diǎn)仍有其缺陷。應(yīng)當(dāng)注意到,對(duì)當(dāng)事人意思自治應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行合理限制,特別是言論自由以及賠償額度方面的限制,以使其權(quán)利行使符合法院地國(guó)的政策導(dǎo)向。第四部分主要探討包括涉外隱私侵權(quán)在內(nèi)的涉外人格侵權(quán)區(qū)分與競(jìng)合問(wèn)題。由于隱私權(quán)與其他人格權(quán)存在千絲萬(wàn)縷的關(guān)系,尤其是肖像權(quán)、姓名權(quán)以及名譽(yù)權(quán)。進(jìn)一步厘清各方關(guān)系,可以為統(tǒng)一司法實(shí)踐提供參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。文章的結(jié)語(yǔ)是對(duì)全文研究進(jìn)行概括和梳理,認(rèn)為我國(guó)涉外隱私侵權(quán)的沖突規(guī)則應(yīng)當(dāng)以當(dāng)事人意思自治優(yōu)先,當(dāng)事人經(jīng)常居所地為補(bǔ)充,同時(shí)以上情形都需要由法院進(jìn)行合理地限制。
[Abstract]:With the development of the times, foreign privacy infringement is an increasingly frequent legal phenomenon. On the face of it, it is only an ordinary civil tort involving foreign factors, and there is no significant difference between it and ordinary foreign-related infringement. As far as its legal consequences are concerned, it has a profound impact on a country's freedom of speech. Internet industry and data mining industry and other aspects of the development. In order to protect the national interests more comprehensively, it is necessary to review the applicable rules of foreign privacy tort law. In modern society, due to the flexibility of privacy content, the special ways of infringement, and the mutual involvement of public power and other private rights, it is necessary to carefully choose and choose the applicable rules of privacy infringement in foreign countries. From the current legislative practice, it can be seen that most countries in the world, including China, do not attach importance to the legal application of privacy infringement involving foreign countries, and the cooperation in the field of international unified substantive law has made slow progress and has had little effect. And the situation is difficult to improve in a short time, the direct impact is that a large number of cases need to be resolved through conflict law. Domestic legislators have noticed the impact of new media such as the Internet on foreign privacy infringement, and formulated relevant regulations. It is undeniable that this regulation is reasonable and scientific, but the content is too single to better meet the needs of practice. Based on this, this paper discusses how to perfect the rules of privacy infringement conflict. In the research method, value analysis is the main method, and comparative analysis is auxiliary. Structurally, the article is divided into four parts, from the relevant perspective to analyze the applicable rules of foreign privacy tort law. The first part introduces the severe reality of foreign privacy infringement and analyzes its characteristics. At the same time, the author emphatically analyzes the relevant international uniform substantive rules and existing conflict rules, and considers that the existing rules can not meet the interests of the country effectively, and the existing rules should be further improved. The second part discusses the choice of the connection point of the foreign privacy tort law. After analyzing that the infringing place is no longer suitable as the connection point, it is acknowledged that the infringing person's place of frequent residence has its inherent reasonableness. However, the infringer's regular residence can not balance all kinds of interests properly, and the infringer's regular residence which is complementary to its function is taken into account. In the third part, the necessity of introducing autonomy of will is studied. It should be noted that there should be reasonable restrictions on party autonomy, in particular with regard to freedom of expression and the amount of compensation, so that the exercise of their rights is consistent with the policy orientation of the forum State. The fourth part mainly discusses the discrimination and concurrence of foreign personality tort including foreign privacy infringement. Due to the inextricable relationship between privacy and other personality rights, especially the right to portrait, the right of name and the right of reputation. Further clarification of the relationship between the parties can provide a reference standard for the unification of judicial practice. The conclusion of the article is to summarize and sort out the full text of the study, and think that the conflict rules of privacy infringement concerning foreign affairs should be supplemented by the autonomy of the parties concerned and the place of residence of the parties. At the same time, the above circumstances need to be reasonably limited by the court.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李儀;;信息法學(xué)研究與教學(xué)中的困境及應(yīng)對(duì)——主要從學(xué)科定位的角度探析[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

2 鄭一爭(zhēng);;論國(guó)際私法對(duì)弱者利益的保護(hù)——以我國(guó)立法為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年07期

3 王緒慧;;韓國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制發(fā)展脈絡(luò)及思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年15期

4 夏亮;;論沖突法強(qiáng)制規(guī)范在涉外海員勞動(dòng)關(guān)系中的適用[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

5 游細(xì)輝;;淺議個(gè)人信息在民法上的保護(hù)[J];電子制作;2014年21期

6 王佳;;國(guó)際私法中的弱者保護(hù)制度[J];法制博覽;2015年13期

7 張建;;論涉外消費(fèi)合同法律適用中的保護(hù)弱者利益原則[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2015年05期

8 宜建林;;從民事立法的角度談個(gè)人信息權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];法制博覽;2015年26期

9 郭英華;;過(guò)錯(cuò)主義歸責(zé)原則在校園傷害事故案件中的運(yùn)用[J];河北法學(xué);2007年11期

10 冉克平;;締約過(guò)失責(zé)任性質(zhì)新論——以德國(guó)學(xué)說(shuō)與判例的變遷為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2010年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 鄔先江;海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

2 陳琦;海上人身?yè)p害賠償制度論[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

3 田園;侵權(quán)行為客觀歸責(zé)理論研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

4 周瓊;論中國(guó)精神損害賠償?shù)氖聦?shí)及相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

5 王錦;環(huán)境法律責(zé)任與制裁手段選擇[D];中共中央黨校;2011年

6 段榮芳;體育運(yùn)動(dòng)傷害侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

7 李云波;相鄰不可量物排放關(guān)系的私法調(diào)整[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

8 齊曉霞;藥害事故防范與救濟(jì)制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

9 于林洋;廣告薦證的法律規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

10 陽(yáng)露昭;環(huán)境污染責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)基本法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王悅;無(wú)意思聯(lián)絡(luò)數(shù)人侵權(quán)的司法認(rèn)定[D];西南科技大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1918205