本文選題：兩岸經濟合作框架協(xié)議 + ECFA��； 參考：《復旦大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：2010年6月29日,《兩岸經濟合作框架協(xié)議》(簡稱ECFA)正式簽署,其后兩岸雙向投資活動頻繁,投資爭端也日益增多。然而,當前兩岸尚未形成專門的投資爭端解決機制,建立投資爭端解決機制具有現實緊迫感及必要性。本文共分為三章,首先闡明了海峽兩岸投資爭端的定義、類型及性質；其次論述了海峽兩岸當前爭端解決模式,并重點分析了可供借鑒的國際投資爭端解決機制,以此作為構建新機制的參考和借鑒；最后結合海峽兩岸當前特色,分別針對三種不同類型的投資爭端提出構建和完善的建議和構想。 第一章將首先剖析研究對象,對海峽兩岸投資爭端做整體介紹。本文擬先介紹兩岸投資爭端發(fā)展變化的歷史,界定“兩岸投資爭端”內涵和類型。通過分類研究的方法,將兩岸投資爭端分成私人間投資爭端、私人與投資地政府間投資爭端及政府間投資爭端三種爭端類型加以考察。全文將依循此爭端分類標準,在三種爭端分類的基礎上分別對各種投資爭端繼續(xù)進行深入的分析探討。本章接著將從法理角度對投資爭端的雙重性質進行分析。第二章將對三種類型的投資爭端進行比較法的研究,本章將分別選取國際上典型的爭端解決機制加以具體分析研究,重點分析各種制度的運行模式、優(yōu)缺點及探討可供兩岸投資爭端解決機制加以借鑒的制度設計。對于第一種爭端,本章論述了我國兩岸間投資爭端解決方面的立法及司法實踐現狀,并提出該制度完善的兩個路徑與方向。對于第二種爭端,本文將詳細分析ICSID、NAFTA、EU三種不同模式的相關規(guī)定,并就三種模式的法律移植問題進行分析。對于第三種爭端,本文將介紹WTO及CEPA模式的內容,并重點分析對其借鑒的可能性。第三章將結合兩岸當前投資爭端解決方面立法與司法實踐現狀,對兩岸私人間投資爭端解決機制的完善、私人與投資地政府間爭端問題的仲裁機制的構建、政府間投資爭端解決機制模式的選擇、爭端預防機制及解決機制的構建提出自己的建議。 本文的目的,主要是希望能夠在對海峽兩岸投資爭端解決機制現狀基礎做全面深入的評估的基礎上,吸收國內外實踐經驗,提出構建和善兩岸投資爭端解決機制的建議。
[Abstract]:On June 29, 2010, the Framework Agreement on Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation (ECFAA) was formally signed. After that, the two-way investment activities between the two sides of the strait were frequent and investment disputes were increasing day by day. However, at present, there is no special investment dispute settlement mechanism between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and it is urgent and necessary to set up an investment dispute settlement mechanism. This paper is divided into three chapters. Firstly, it clarifies the definition, types and nature of cross-strait investment disputes, and then discusses the current dispute settlement model of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and focuses on the analysis of the international investment dispute settlement mechanism that can be used for reference. Finally, combining with the current characteristics of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the author puts forward some suggestions and ideas for the construction and perfection of three different types of investment disputes. The first chapter will analyze the research object and introduce the investment dispute between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. This paper first introduces the history of the development and changes of cross-strait investment disputes, and defines the connotation and types of cross-strait investment disputes. In this paper, the investment disputes between Taiwan and Taiwan are divided into three types: private investment disputes, private investment disputes and intergovernmental investment disputes. Based on the classification of three kinds of disputes, this paper will continue to analyze and discuss the investment disputes in depth. This chapter will then analyze the dual nature of investment disputes from the perspective of legal theory. The second chapter will carry on the comparative research to three kinds of investment disputes, this chapter will select the international typical dispute settlement mechanism separately to carry on the concrete analysis research, emphatically analyzes each kind of system movement pattern, The advantages and disadvantages and the system design which can be used for reference by the investment dispute settlement mechanism of both sides of the strait are discussed. For the first kind of dispute, this chapter discusses the current situation of legislation and judicial practice in the settlement of investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and puts forward two ways and directions for the perfection of the system. For the second kind of dispute, this paper will analyze the relevant provisions of three different models of ICSIDN NAFTAEU in detail, and analyze the legal transplantation of the three models. For the third kind of dispute, this paper will introduce the content of WTO and CEPA mode, and analyze the possibility of using for reference. The third chapter will combine the current situation of legislation and judicial practice in the settlement of investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, perfect the settlement mechanism of the private investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and construct the arbitration mechanism of the disputes between the private and the local governments. The choice of intergovernmental investment dispute settlement mechanism, the construction of dispute prevention mechanism and settlement mechanism are put forward. The purpose of this paper is to make a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of the present situation of the investment dispute settlement mechanism between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, absorb the domestic and foreign practical experience, and put forward some suggestions for the establishment of a friendly settlement mechanism for investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1;D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王彥志;;國際投資爭端解決的法律化:成就與挑戰(zhàn)[J];當代法學;2011年03期

2 陳力;;海峽兩岸投資爭議解決機制之構建與完善[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2011年06期

3 張相君;;海峽兩岸民商事交往法律適用的實體法路徑研究[J];福建法學;2010年04期

4 李燕芳;;海峽兩岸民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助若干法律問題探討[J];福建廣播電視大學學報;2010年05期

5 肖平;曾麗凌;;論《海峽兩岸經濟合作框架協(xié)議》之法律性質與效果[J];海峽法學;2011年01期

6 梁開銀;;論ICSID與WTO爭端解決機制的沖突及選擇——以國家和私人投資爭議解決為視角[J];法學雜志;2009年08期

7 徐崇利;;晚近國際投資爭端解決實踐之評判:“全球治理”理論的引入[J];法學家;2010年03期

8 鮑薇;;國際投資爭端解決機制與WTO爭端解決機制[J];法制與社會;2010年01期

9 曾嘯;;國際投資爭端解決機制的缺陷及完善[J];法制與社會;2010年14期

10 陳融;;ECFA的后續(xù)篇章——大陸關于臺胞投資權益保護法制的成就與完善[J];法治研究;2011年01期

，

本文編號：1911530