本文選題：時事新聞權(quán)益 + 公眾信息獲取權(quán)��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國著作權(quán)法自頒布以來,歷經(jīng)修改,然而對于“時事新聞不受著作權(quán)法保護”的認識卻似乎一直根深蒂固。對于時事新聞概念的內(nèi)涵和外延,新聞學界和法學學術(shù)界各有自己的說法,沒有形成一個統(tǒng)一的概念界定。2002年國務院實施的《著作權(quán)法實施條例》第5條規(guī)定:“時事新聞,是通過電視臺、報紙、期刊、廣播電臺等媒體報道的單純事實消息�！毙侣剬W界及實務界普遍把時事新聞界定為電視臺、報紙、廣播電臺、網(wǎng)絡(luò)等媒體-對各類社會新近發(fā)生事件的采訪報道。法學界和新聞界對時事新聞的界定存在不小差異。由于著作權(quán)法對時事新聞保護規(guī)定不完善,實踐中出現(xiàn)了眾多媒體為節(jié)省成本,提高收視率、收聽率、發(fā)行率、點擊率等,對時事新聞作品進行侵權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)載,導致時事新聞首家報道媒體權(quán)益受到損害。且極易形成一個惡性循環(huán),獨家首家時事新聞被侵權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)載的越多,愿意投入物力人力挖掘采寫獨家首家新聞的媒體就越少。公眾信息獲取權(quán)的實現(xiàn)也因此受到負面影響。為更好的保障公眾信息獲取權(quán),保護挖掘采寫獨家首家時事新聞媒體的合法權(quán)益,本文通過厘析時事新聞概念,論證了時事新聞保護的必要性,并就如何更好的保護時事新聞提出了自己的建議。 本文利用分析比較法、實例論證法和解釋學等方法,對時事新聞的保護進行了討論。除了開頭部門的引言和末尾的結(jié)語外,本文的主體包括四個部分。第一部分探討了時事新聞在法學領(lǐng)域和新聞學領(lǐng)域的內(nèi)涵和外延,并就時事新聞的概念提出了自己的觀點。第二部分討論了時事新聞保護的必要性。第三部分分別從反不正當競爭法和著作權(quán)法的角度對時事新聞的保護模式進行了分析。對比了《伯爾尼保護文學和藝術(shù)作品公約》,以及美國、德國、意大利、日本、英國等國家對時事新聞保護保護的相關(guān)規(guī)定,介紹分析其可借鑒的部分,并對時事新聞不受著作權(quán)保護的眾多解釋進行了剖析評價。第四部分檢討了我國目前對時事新聞的保護現(xiàn)狀,指出了其不足,并就其完善提出了自己的建議。
[Abstract]:China's copyright law has been amended since its promulgation, but the understanding that current affairs news is not protected by copyright law has always been deeply rooted. As to the connotation and extension of the concept of current affairs news, both the journalism and the legal academic circles have their own views and have not formed a unified definition of the concept. Article 5 of the regulations on the implementation of the copyright Law implemented by the State Council in 2002 stipulates: "current affairs news, It is pure factual news reported by television, newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, and so on. " Current affairs news is generally defined as TV station, newspaper, radio station, network and so on in the field of journalism and practice. There is no small difference in the definition of current affairs news between the legal circles and the press. Due to the imperfect provisions of the copyright Law on the protection of current affairs news, in practice, a large number of media, in order to save costs, increase ratings, listen to, distribute, click, and so on, have infringed and reprinted current affairs news works. As a result, current affairs news first reported media rights and interests were damaged. And it is easy to form a vicious circle, the more exclusive news is reproduced by infringement, the less the media will be willing to invest manpower to read and write the first exclusive news. The realization of public access to information is therefore adversely affected. In order to better protect the public's right to obtain information and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the first exclusive news media, this paper demonstrates the necessity of the protection of current affairs news by analyzing the concept of current affairs news. And how to better protect current affairs news put forward own suggestion. This paper discusses the protection of current affairs news by means of analytical comparison, case study and hermeneutics. In addition to the introduction of the beginning and the end of the conclusion, the main body of this paper consists of four parts. The first part discusses the connotation and extension of current affairs news in the field of law and journalism, and puts forward its own views on the concept of current affairs news. The second part discusses the necessity of news protection. The third part analyzes the protection mode of current news from the angle of anti-unfair competition law and copyright law. By comparing the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and artistic works and the relevant provisions of the United States, Germany, Italy, Japan, Britain and other countries on the protection of current affairs news, this paper introduces and analyzes the parts that can be used for reference. At the same time, it analyzes and evaluates the many interpretations of current affairs news which are not protected by copyright. The fourth part reviews the current situation of China's protection of current news, points out its shortcomings, and puts forward its own suggestions on its perfection.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.41;D997.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李靖,湯華;著作權(quán)的保護:新聞作品不該例外[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1909885