本文選題：IMF貸款條件性 + 實體內(nèi)容��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當今世界經(jīng)濟體系中,國際貨幣基金組織(以下簡稱IMF)承擔著穩(wěn)定金融形勢、促進經(jīng)濟平穩(wěn)增長的職能。自二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,國際貨幣基金組織在維護世界金融秩序中作出了突出的貢獻。根據(jù)IMF的宗旨,IMF的根本目標是協(xié)調(diào)或者促進實現(xiàn)會員國國際收支平衡,當IMF在幫助成員國改善國際收支狀況而提供貸款時,往往要附加一系列的貸款條件并建立起一套主要由決策機制和表決機制構(gòu)成的貸款程序,本文將貸款條件和貸款程序所構(gòu)成的有機整體稱之為IMF貸款條件性。2008年美國次貸危機以后,作為對國際金融體系最有發(fā)言權(quán)的國際機構(gòu),因其協(xié)調(diào)世界各國共同應對危機的角色而備受人關注,然而,在IMF歷次救援行動中都附加了極為苛刻的貸款條件性而效果卻不盡如人意。改革IMF貸款條件性的呼聲逐漸高漲。 由西方發(fā)達國家所主導IMF貸款條件性從其產(chǎn)生起就因其苛刻的貸款條件和對成員國經(jīng)濟主權(quán)的挑戰(zhàn)而不斷受到各種質(zhì)疑和批判。而如今世界各國金融危機頻發(fā),IMF卻顯得束手無策,對于IMF貸款條件性的改革更是被推上了風口浪尖。近年來,不論是IMF各成員國還是IMF內(nèi)部都傾向于對IMF貸款條件性進行改革,同時也出臺了一系列的改革措施,但是就目前來看,效果仍然不理想,在程序和實體方面的問題仍舊沒有得到很好的解決,甚至導致了在2010年12月希臘爆發(fā)的主權(quán)債務危機中,希臘民眾通過游行的方式反對希臘政府接受IMF的貸款援助。 本文以IMF貸款條件性為題,運用分析歷史分析、規(guī)范分析、實證分析、觀察描述等研究方法就IMF貸款條件性所涉及到的法律問題進行全面探討,全文共分為五部分,其主要內(nèi)容如下: 本文第一部分是對IMF貸款條件性進行的一個宏觀上的概述,通過對IMF宗旨、職能、IMF貸款的種類進行介紹,以此為背景,對IMF貸款條件性的實體內(nèi)容和程序條件進行界定,并在融合各專家學者對IMF貸款條件性的定義的基礎上提出自己對IMF貸款條件性含義的理解。本文第二部分從實證角度出發(fā),以IMF在2010年希臘債務危機中的表現(xiàn)為切入點,對IMF貸款條件性的實體條件——貸款條件進行了深入的探討。本文第三部分采用歷史分析和規(guī)范分析的研究方法對IMF的程序條件進行梳理,并從配額的分配和決策權(quán)的行使兩方面進行了探討。本文第四部分就IMF貸款條件性最具爭議的問題進行了法律上的分析和探討,即IMF貸款條件性對成員國經(jīng)濟主權(quán)的挑戰(zhàn)。在文章最后一部分,通過對IMF貸款條件性實體內(nèi)容和程序條件的探討,結(jié)合當今全球經(jīng)濟發(fā)展態(tài)勢,作者提出了一系列改革IMF貸款條件性的法律建議,以期推動IMF貸款條件性的改革,建立更加公正、合理的國際經(jīng)濟新秩序。
[Abstract]:In today's world economic system, the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as IMF) bears the function of stabilizing the financial situation and promoting the smooth economic growth. Since the end of World War II, the International Monetary Fund has made outstanding contributions to the maintenance of the world financial order. According to the purpose of the IMF, the fundamental goal of IMF is to coordinate or promote the realization of the meeting. With the balance of payments in the country, when IMF provides loans to help member countries to improve the balance of payments situation, a series of loan conditions are often attached and a set of loan procedures mainly made up of decision-making mechanism and voting mechanism are established. The organic whole of loan conditions and loan procedures is called IMF loan conditional.2008. After the American subprime crisis, the international financial system, which has the most speaking right to the international financial system, has attracted much attention as it coordinates the role of the world in responding to the role of the crisis. However, there are extremely harsh loan conditionality added to the IMF rescue operations, but the effect is not satisfactory. The voice of reforming the IMF loan conditionality gradually Upsurge.
The IMF loan conditionality led by western developed countries has been constantly questioned and criticized for its harsh loan conditions and the challenge to the economic sovereignty of its member countries. Now, the financial crisis of all countries in the world is frequent, but IMF seems to be helpless, and the reform of the IMF loan character has been pushed to the top of the storm. Over the years, both IMF member countries and IMF are inclined to reform the IMF loan conditionality and have also introduced a series of reform measures, but in the present time, the effect is still not ideal, the problems in the program and entity still have not been well solved, and even led to the sovereignty over Greece in December 2010. During the debt crisis, the Greek people opposed the Greek government's acceptance of IMF's loan assistance by procession.
This paper, based on the IMF loan conditionality, uses analytical history analysis, normative analysis, empirical analysis, observation description and other research methods to discuss the legal problems involved in IMF loan conditionality. The full text is divided into five parts, the main contents are as follows:
The first part of this article is a macro overview of the IMF loan conditionality. Through the introduction of the IMF purpose, function, and the type of IMF loan, it defines the substantive content and the procedural conditions of the IMF loan conditionality, and puts forward his own IM on the basis of the integration of the definition of the IMF loan conditionality. F loan conditionality understanding. The second part of this paper, from an empirical point of view, takes IMF as the breakthrough point in the 2010 Greek debt crisis, and discusses the entity conditions of the IMF loan conditionality - the loan conditions in depth. The third part of this paper adopts the historical and normative analysis method to the procedural conditions of the IMF This paper discusses the two aspects of the allocation of quotas and the exercise of the decision-making power. The fourth part of this paper makes a legal analysis and Discussion on the most controversial issues of the IMF loan conditionality, namely, the challenge of the IMF loan conditionality to the economic sovereignty of the member countries. In the last part of the article, the content of the conditional substantive content of the IMF loan and the content of the conditional loan are discussed. In the light of the current global economic development, the author puts forward a series of legal proposals to reform the IMF conditionality of loans in order to promote the reform of IMF conditionality and establish a more just and reasonable new international economic order.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.2;F831.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 鄂曉梅;析IMF貸款條件的法律效力[J];法學評論;2002年05期

2 林威;;IMF改革及中國策略[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下半月);2008年05期

3 周先平;IMF貸款條件新指導方針研究[J];國際金融研究;2003年02期

4 曹勇;;國際貨幣基金組織貸款條件研究:以阿根廷為例[J];國際金融研究;2005年11期

5 張明;;國際貨幣體系改革:背景、原因、措施及中國的參與[J];國際經(jīng)濟評論;2010年01期

6 曹勇;;國際貨幣基金組織貸款的政治經(jīng)濟學分析:模型與案例[J];國際政治研究;2005年04期

7 張磊;;關于IMF援助條件的本質(zhì)辨析——以亞洲金融危機的反思為視角[J];甘肅省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2006年03期

8 張立坤;;淺論IMF的缺陷及改革[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;2006年02期

9 萬國華;從亞洲金融危機看IMF法律機制亟待改革的幾個重要問題[J];南開學報;1999年02期

10 楊柳;;淺析國際貨幣基金組織貸款框架改革[J];山東行政學院山東省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2009年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 藺捷;IMF貸款條件性法律問題研究[D];武漢大學;2007年

2 王晶;國際貨幣基金組織改革探析[D];吉林大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1904647