本文選題：海上安全風險管控 + 區(qū)域性安排　； 參考：《南京社會科學》2017年09期

【摘要】：海上安全風險國際管控呈公約規(guī)制和區(qū)域性安排并存的二元模式。區(qū)域性安排的理念、自身優(yōu)勢和實踐效果,使區(qū)域性安排成為海上安全風險國際管控的一種較優(yōu)選擇。針對區(qū)域性安排存在的"弱強制性"、"劃海而治"與"規(guī)則沖突"等不足,需要從硬法和軟法兩個維度予以完善。硬法維度即實現(xiàn)區(qū)域性安排的法律化,包括借鑒補強機制等外部措施實現(xiàn)區(qū)域性安排的強制約束力,推動區(qū)域性安排轉化為一種區(qū)域習慣(法)規(guī)則;軟法維度即協(xié)調(diào)單邊和各區(qū)域性安排的風險管控措施,并借助海事安全條約強制履約審核實現(xiàn)"再協(xié)調(diào)"。
[Abstract]:The international control of maritime safety risk is a dual model of convention regulation and regional arrangement. The idea of regional arrangement, its own advantage and practical effect make regional arrangement a better choice for international control of maritime safety risk. In view of the shortcomings of "weak compulsion", "rule over the sea" and "conflict of rules" existing in regional arrangements, it is necessary to perfect the two dimensions of hard law and soft law. The dimension of hard law is to realize the legalization of regional arrangements, including using external measures such as reinforcement mechanism to realize the binding force of regional arrangements, and to promote the conversion of regional arrangements into a kind of regional customary (legal) rules; The dimension of soft law is to coordinate the risk control measures of unilateral and regional arrangements, and to realize "recoordination" with the help of mandatory compliance audit of maritime safety treaties.
【作者單位】： 上海大學法學院;上海研究院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目“海上防空識別區(qū)理論與實踐的法律研究”(14BFX128)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D993.5

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 張麗娜;;海盜治理與南海海上安全保障機制[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2009年01期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 史克功;;海上安全形勢變化對海洋法秩序的影響[A];《中國海洋法學評論》2008年卷第2期[C];2008年

，

本文編號：1899080