發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 20:50

  本文選題：GATT + WTO�。� 參考：《廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2010年04期

【摘要】：美國(guó)訴"中國(guó)影響出版物和視聽娛樂(lè)產(chǎn)品的貿(mào)易權(quán)和分銷服務(wù)措施"一案是WTO第一起直接適用GATT第20條(a)款的公共道德例外的案件。本案中上訴機(jī)構(gòu)首次明確了GATT第20條(a)款的可適用性,確認(rèn)了應(yīng)由被訴成員來(lái)確立公共道德的含義和相關(guān)性的慣例,明晰了"必需"考察的要素、方法和舉證責(zé)任問(wèn)題,并將貿(mào)易限制考察范圍有條件地延伸到對(duì)貿(mào)易主體的貿(mào)易限制程度上。本案給中國(guó)未來(lái)參與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決提供了多重啟示,中國(guó)應(yīng)準(zhǔn)確把握一般例外主張上的要點(diǎn),特別應(yīng)重視爭(zhēng)端解決過(guò)程中的舉證。
[Abstract]:The case of the United States v. China affecting Trade Rights of Publications and Audio-visual Entertainment products and measures of Distribution Services is the first case in which WTO directly applies Section 20 of GATT to the exception of public morality. In this case, the appellate body for the first time clarified the applicability of section 20 (a) of the GATT, confirmed the practice that the meaning and relevance of public morality should be established by the accused member, and clarified the elements, methods and burden of proof of the "necessary" examination, The scope of trade restriction is extended to the extent of trade restriction. This case provides many revelations for China to participate in the WTO dispute settlement in the future. China should accurately grasp the main points of the general exception proposition and pay particular attention to the proof in the process of dispute settlement.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)WTO學(xué)院;
【基金】：2009年教育部青年項(xiàng)目《國(guó)際貨物買賣損害賠償實(shí)證制度研究》(編號(hào):09YJC820086)成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 y嚮鄯，

本文編號(hào)：1898350