本文選題：投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議�。� 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：因臺(tái)灣地區(qū)針對(duì)大陸地區(qū)人民的投資許可法規(guī)與2009年才予出臺(tái),兩岸投資交流“雙向性”的特點(diǎn)還不明顯但卻絕對(duì)可以預(yù)見,故而學(xué)界關(guān)于投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的論述還不多,在“國(guó)際”層面的論述就更少。目前兩岸正在醞釀“經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議”(ECFA)的構(gòu)建,投資必將成為其中很重要的一部分內(nèi)容,投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制將是重中之重。本文先論述兩岸構(gòu)建自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的必要性以及可行性,進(jìn)而闡述構(gòu)建投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的基本內(nèi)容包括基本原則與借鑒NAFTA的原因,以及其具體內(nèi)容包括解決私人與對(duì)方政府間投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建與雙方政府間投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建。需要特別說明的是,由于私人間的投資爭(zhēng)端一般僅涉及私人利益,以現(xiàn)有機(jī)制已基本可以應(yīng)對(duì),故而本文對(duì)此方面將不予涉及。
[Abstract]:Since the Taiwan region's investment licensing laws and regulations for the people of the mainland were only promulgated in 2009, the characteristics of cross-strait investment exchanges as "bidirectional" are not obvious but absolutely predictable. Therefore, there is not much academic discussion on the investment dispute settlement mechanism. There is even less discussion at the "international" level. At present, the construction of "Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement" (ECFAA) is brewing between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and investment will become a very important part of it, and the settlement mechanism of investment disputes will be the top priority. This paper first discusses the necessity and feasibility of establishing a free trade agreement between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and then expounds the basic contents of the investment dispute settlement mechanism, including the basic principles and the reasons for drawing lessons from NAFTA. And its concrete contents include the construction of the settlement mechanism of the investment dispute between the private and the other government and the construction of the settlement mechanism of the investment dispute between the two governments. It should be noted in particular that since investment disputes between private individuals generally involve only private interests, the existing mechanism can be basically dealt with, so this article will not deal with this aspect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 周成新;關(guān)于我國(guó)加入WTO后經(jīng)濟(jì)特區(qū)存在和發(fā)展的法律思考[J];法商研究;2003年02期

2 韓龍;世貿(mào)組織的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化制度芻議[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2003年03期

3 李灝;在WTO條件下,推進(jìn)“兩岸四地”的經(jīng)濟(jì)整合[J];開放導(dǎo)報(bào);2003年01期

4 陸建人;2001年?yáng)|亞區(qū)域合作新進(jìn)展[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年03期

5 李向陽(yáng);全球化時(shí)代的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)合作[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年05期

6 陳雯;試析東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)建設(shè)對(duì)東盟區(qū)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的影響[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：1897109